Burzynski: Another fact-blind troll, who predicted that?

Another fact-blind troll has joined the “illustrious” ranks of  @BurzynskiMovie, @MissNissKat, @Sk8scooter and @Burzynski_saves (who, to his credit, seems to be adopting a more reasonable persona now).

Ne’s like a rash over the blogs and twitter, he’s also been banned from Wikipedia which has a more robust attitude to sockpuppets and block evasion than some services.

These are the twitter accounts (in rough reverse order) I can recall (strikeout for the terminated ones), feel free to let me know of any others:

All display precisely the same kind of “I didn’t hear that” bullshit. I can’t add much to Keir Liddle’s analysis of this particular vermin other than to say his agenda appears to be to annoy, not to persuade, as persuasion would require engaging with and addressing criticisms of his arguments.

Incidentally, I heartily recommend Janetter. It has a “Mute” feature which removes users not only from your own timeline but from all searches. Then all you need to do is check the web when the troll has had enough time to pay out another noose, pull the trapdoor and wait for the next round of whack-a-mole.


I sort of gave up tracking this cretin, but he’s still at it!

4 thoughts on “Burzynski: Another fact-blind troll, who predicted that?”

  1. He’s prepared to accept absence of negative evidence as positive evidence when it agrees with his views but then attempts to criticise skeptics for not possessing Burzynski trial data and claims that inability of skeptics to show that Burzynski treatments don’t work is evidence that they do work! Then there’s the whole Burzynski PhD saga……
    Can’t decide whether he’s a true believer, a mark or a shill. Maybe some combination of them all!

  2. After all his comments on RI, I think somewhere in there is a bit of a fallacious thinking whereby all of SBM should be criticised, and by focusing on one particular person – Burzyinski – without ‘evidence’ of Burzyinski doing anything wrong, the skeptics are therefore wrong and should be criticising everyone else instead/as well. Or some such. But outside of that, I’m going with troll.

  3. I wonder what Wayne Dolcefino, Burzynski’s “reputation management” spokesman, has to say about this clown. He’s been notably obscure lately.

Comments are closed.