Nuxx:A9352469-03f8-44ac-9999-b2834bec7aec@r40g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r40g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Spindrift: "Vile Car-Hating Fanatic" (Not Said By Me) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:51:15 -0800 (PST) References: <30f5b32b-8ca4-4f1e-b146-08d44e210a28@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <58Ifl.107$zv7.34@newsfe01.ams2> Lines: 96 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.151.152.80 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1233121875 22049 127.0.0.1 (28 Jan 2009 05:51:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r40g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.151.152.80; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 6413 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:684149

On Jan 27, 6:12=A0pm, "Brian RobertsOn"  wrote: > "Nuxx Bar"  wrote in message > > news:30f5b32b-8ca4-4f1e-b146-08d44e210a28@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com... > > > > > Spindrift has recently been polluting the SafeSpeed forums with his > > usual agenda-driven, dishonest, hate-filled rubbish (and refusals to > > answer any questions), before once again being banned (as he has from > > oh-so-many other forums, and not just SafeSpeed/PH but all sorts of > > cycling ones), not for his point of view, but for being a disgusting, > > trolling cunt as per, who simply makes the same copied and pasted > > allegations again and again no matter how often they are refuted. > > > An interesting discussion has resulted, away from the eyes of trolls, > > where an incredible number of people seem to have the same > > "misconception" that Spindrift, and a number of other fanatical > > cycling trolls, hate cars. =A0How strange! =A0It was pointed out that a > > certain poster was really interested in cycling, and had been > > perfectly welcome on a particular cycling forum - until they said that > > they liked cars as well. =A0Immediately, it was made very clear to them > > that they were no longer welcome. =A0As someone says, in some web- > > cyclists'* eyes, you are allowed to drive as long as you don't enjoy > > it too much. =A0It seems that being pro-cyclist is optional and > > unimportant, whereas being at least somewhat anti-motorist is most > > definitely mandatory. > > > When are you absolute fuckwits (you know who you are) going to give it > > up and admit to hating cars? =A0Why are you so ashamed of doing so? =A0= Is > > it because you know that such hatred can't be defended (in which case, > > why practise it?) =A0Or is it because you've decided that you'll have a > > better chance of inflicting misery on drivers if you play dirty and > > pretend that you care about "safety" or "the environment" instead (in > > which case you're a lying piece of shit who is weakening genuine > > safety and environment-related efforts)? =A0Either way, you're scum > > really, aren't you? > > > Oh, BTW, several of the contributors to the SafeSpeed thread in > > question are quite happy to admit, on that very thread, to being > > fanatical cyclists themselves, and no-one has a problem with that. > > Why is it that cyclists who enjoy cycling are tolerated on motoring- > > related forums, but not the other way round? =A0Why are web-cyclists th= e > > only ones who discriminate against posters based on which modes of > > transport they enjoy? > > > Oh, and if you ever decide to argue with Spindrift (pointless though > > it is to try to reason with a deranged lunatic) on any forum, for > > goodness' sake don't let him get hold of your workplace or home > > address. =A0At best, you'll receive a high volume of deeply disturbing, > > abusive letters (and the more you stick up for motorists, the sicker > > the content will be). =A0At worst, you'll have to move due to receiving > > multiple bomb threats. =A0You have been warned. > > > (And if, by any chance, you're a reasonable person who supports speed > > cameras, why do you suppose it is that all of the worst, most > > demented, most dishonest, most infamous transport policy-related > > Internet freaks, like Spindrift, Chapman, and Jaded, all seem to > > support, rather than oppose, cameras? =A0Having read their posts, do yo= u > > really think that they support cameras because they want to save > > lives? =A0Do they seem like altruistic people to you? =A0Or do they see= m > > like lying, selfish, obsessive, extremist nutters who have an axe to > > grind against motorists and capitalism and see speed cameras as a way > > of getting what they want? =A0Which do you *honestly* think is closer t= o > > the truth? =A0I rest my case.) > > > -- > > * This has become the term for "Spindrift/Crapman-like car-hating > > wanker who frequents cycling forums, may or may not actually cycle, > > and (despite denying it) hates drivers so much that they are prepared > > to kill people in order to make things worse for them, while launching > > despicable and vitriolic hate campaigns against anyone who exposes > > their anti-motorist weapons for what they are". > > Still a trolling imbercile then, Nuxx?

I always love it when somone makes themselves look incredibly stupid by misspelling a word like "imbecile".

> I hate cars and have no problem admitting it. Anything that puts more poi= nts > on the licences of car drivers is just about fine with me.

Good for you. You weren't actually one of the people to whom I was referring, and your one (1) saving grace is that you are at least honest about hating cars, and advocating measures which make things harder for car drivers even if they happen to kill people as well. (You're not really too bothered about road users dying, are you? That's why you made the decision to endanger people's lives with the bottle, and you probably still do, since you seem to be pissed every time you post here.)