Nuxx:B85b118a-250e-4648-9827-59f773934b62@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:06:58 -0700 (PDT) References: <314d23ba-814d-41ca-ac52-93ea1ff46739@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <2f7o351bp1akl56ml0qd8dag9kav3c7l1q@4ax.com> <989t35l0aiit18j8fq0qm2u99btb2vilbf@4ax.com>  <6b6u35t74j87auip0eo757tha18fmmhdso@4ax.com>       Lines: 53 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245697618 32119 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2009 19:06:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3691 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:711168

On Jun 22, 6:04=A0pm, "Budstaff"  wrote: > "Judith M Smith"  wrote in messagenews:dv9v351l6= 5rvct5duhsom619jgt90s9al3@4ax.com... > > > On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:47:50 -0700 (PDT), RudiL  > > wrote: > > > > > >>I expect she will say she has only ever posted facts and that hardly > >>any of her vile malicious postings about Guy has ever been a personal > >>attack ... > > >>Rudi > > > What are these "vile" postings I have made about Chapman? > > > I have said he is a fuckwit. > > > I have said he is a liar. > > > I have said he is despicable. > > > I have said he is incompetent. > > > He has said he is obnoxious. > > Most of which are in your sigs, so 2,000 is probably a conservative > estimate. I would suggest that someone who doesn't see such statements > (whether or not they are true) to be personal attacks, may be a little bi= t > vile themselves.

Judith's sig above is a perfect example: it's *not* a personal attack, it's just saying stuff about Chapman which is too near the bone. Chapman and/or his sycophants disliking such signatures does not automatically mean that they are personal attacks. What is in any way a "personal attack" about the following? It's just stating the facts and exposing Chapman's deceit, hypocrisy and obnoxiousness. It's no more a personal attack than when a newspaper prints damning revelations about an MP (BTW I'm *very* surprised that Crapman isn't an MP; he's got just the right personality).

-- Judith's sig --

Guy Chapman nym-shifted to Lou Knee in order to call someone a shit. He was caught out by the evidence of the IP address he used. He has "implied" that it was not himself - but refuses to answer the simple question: "Guy Chapman: Did you make the Lou Knee post?" He is despicable - on this evidence you should not believe *anything* he says.