Nuxx:Fbf156fb-0857-4003-a3da-f45380ff4410@t13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!t13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM is now dead Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:24:45 -0800 (PST) References: <20110224135120.715c9f6c@bluemoon>   <1jx7mqv.930q4115d14d1N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>      <0bikm65cl93o24j3a8g46mdmlbspjsgk35@4ax.com> <806b0346-037b-4f66-ad91-c71af7ccc3d9@o14g2000prb.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 49 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299021886 24854 127.0.0.1 (1 Mar 2011 23:24:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4338 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38296

On Mar 1, 7:23=A0pm, Nobby Anderson  wrote: > Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > On Mar 1, 12:12 pm, Trollsworth LeTrole > > wrote: > > >> The way I remember it > > > Do you "remember" who you used to post as on URC yet? =A0(Oops, sorry, > > you've got Nobby Anderson scared-to-answer syndrome on that one, > > haven't you?) > > Yeah, I imagine he's petrified, much like (and probably about as much as) > I am. =A0Why don't you try phoning him in the middle of the night and > accusing him of being a forgetful murdering liar? =A0I hear that some > think that's a good tactic for trying to scare people, what do you > think?

Mostly very much the usual drivel, but I'm curious as to where you got "forgetful" from. When have I ever said, or been accused of saying, that about Chapman? Also I don't think anyone's ever said that the made-up phone calls in question were to scare anyone. I can think of much better ways to scare people if I wanted to do that. If I'm the awful creepy stalker that Chapman melodramatically makes out that I am in order to get sympathy, it's funny how he doesn't seem to have had bricks through his window, or graffiti on his car, or indeed anything much in reality. If I ever get stalked then I hope it's in the totally non-existent, non-threatening way that Chapman is being "stalked".

But it's interesting that despite your claiming to think Chapman is as bad as me, you're ready (like other Chapman-lovers) to believe without question (or any evidence) his ludicrous allegations that 1) he received the phone calls and 2) I made them. I can only surmise that you like Chapman rather more than you let on, and so my theory that you won't say whether you think he posted as Lou Knee because you don't want to weaken his position in any way just gathers yet more steam.

He has said that he's got the police involved because of my "stalking", yet I've not heard a dickie bird from the boys in blue. Could that possibly be because I haven't actually done anything? Why don't you give Chapman a hard time about the "police" rubbish in the same way as you do about my legal action against him? That seems like yet another example of you favouring him.

You're just as entitled to be a fan of Chapman as Simon Mason or anyone else is. But there's no need to deny it, or to pretend that you're avoiding answering the LK question to do anything but avoid embarrassing him.