Nuxx:95144b08-4992-4cf8-965e-8d42b9260595@d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <95144b08-4992-4cf8-965e-8d42b9260595@d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Hyde Park Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:18:32 -0700 (PDT) References: <5b8fa77b-6906-4139-b93d-faf756cf8499@18g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <69e4551j3167vpesaku3vtgg5b510mvt6s@4ax.com>      Lines: 63 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247163512 26816 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2009 18:18:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:18:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4004 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:716144

On Jul 9, 5:00=A0pm, JNugent  wrote: > Nuxx Bar wrote: > > On Jul 8, 8:04 pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  > > wrote: > >> On Jul 8, 7:58 pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > >>> My goodness, you've really lost it this time. =A0You're really not ve= ry > >>> good at this "detective work" > >> So you say. =A0It remains the case that the car is not mine, neither i= s > >> the other car mentioned above. > > > *Where* has anyone suggested otherwise? =A0I honestly don't know what > > you're blethering on about. =A0Are you drunk or on drugs or something? > > Extraordinary behaviour, even for you. > > >>> On the other hand, you *did* make the first Lou Knee post - didn't yo= u? > >> As it happens, no. > > > God given you permission to lie about that now, has "He"? =A0Or did you > > make a cross with your fingers as you posted the above? > > > You're going to have to give a very convincing explanation as to why > > you evaded the question for *so long* if you want anyone to believe > > your belated answer. =A0Why didn't you just answer the first time? =A0W= hy > > choose this particular time to answer? =A0There's got to be some reason > > why you didn't just nip it in the bud long ago when you had the > > chance. =A0You know that explaining yourself properly is the only way t= o > > make the Lou Knee business go away. > > It seems very likely that Guy was telling the truth when he stated that h= e > was not the person who made the first post under that name. > > The first usenet mention of "Lou Knee" I can quickly find was made in 198= 9: > >  > > Google Groups shows that there are usenet posts from one "Lou Knee Bin" m= ade > in 2008. > > The exact posting name "Lou Knee" (unadorned with any addenda) was used i= n a > web-based forum in 2004: > > 

Ah. That explains it; thanks. Back to where we were then.

Guy Chapman, did you make the Lou Knee post calling another poster a "piece of s**t"? If you refuse to answer that question having answered the one above, it just makes you look even more guilty....

And are you going to explain why you started denying that those cars were yours when no-one had suggested otherwise? I just can't fathom why you'd do such a thing. It's utterly bizarre and more than a little paranoid.