Nuxx:7df0840f-c77a-4ce1-a871-5e7c02ff94b0@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <7df0840f-c77a-4ce1-a871-5e7c02ff94b0@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Chapman: His Agenda Exposed Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:53:17 -0700 (PDT) References: <0f3fd3c5-7db2-47aa-bbd5-bbbae629d329@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6fg1d3FbcseoU1@mid.individual.net> <96o5941n82ql2iacpfcr2p051ck8u3shdl@4ax.com> <6fg9bhFbd4rmU1@mid.individual.net> <6c1e5822-7458-4945-bc56-d1ace894ef0f@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <5b7fea88-8af0-423d-ba33-85d3e264d80e@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> Lines: 50 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217591598 32760 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 11:53:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3500 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:660125

On Aug 1, 12:47=A0pm, spindrift  wrote: > On Aug 1, 12:43=A0pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > > > On Aug 1, 12:11=A0pm, "Paul - xxx"  wrote: > > > > judith wrote: > > > > On 1 Aug 2008 08:56:03 GMT, "Paul - xxx"  > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Question 2 is a personal decision. =A0If you'd read about GC (all > > > > > freely available on t'net) you'd have already seen the reasoning > > > > > behind it and wouldn't need to ask the question. > > > > > Where Question 2 is > > > > =A0Are you going to either substantiate or retract your > > > > accusation that I've been using other people's words? > > > > > You what? > > > > > What to do mean a personal decision? > > > > LOL, that's me getting something wrong ... I'd also just read Nuxx > > > asking about why GC's kids wear helmets ... and got the two mixed up > > > for which I apologise. > > > Hallelujah. =A0A urc denizen actually admitting that they were wrong, > > and even deigning to apologise. =A0Now we just need Crapman to do the > > same regarding his accusations about me using other people's words. > > And while we're at it, he can finally admit the bleeding obvious: that > > his sole reason for supporting cameras is that he wants motorists off > > the road, and he wants motorists off the road because he HATES THEM.- H= ide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Name the building I'm supposed to have caused to evacuate. You're > claiming I'm a "serious criminal" and have made threats somewhere. > Where?

I don't even know the name of the building, and if I did, I wouldn't post it here. I know of the person whose workplace you threatened, however, and so do you. Let's face it, it's not too much of a stretch for someone who conducted a vicious, personal and libellous smear campaign for several years against one person who dared to propagate the truth about your beloved, anti-motorist speed cameras.