Nuxx:29393a4d-1be9-447c-afb8-003fd92665bc@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <29393a4d-1be9-447c-afb8-003fd92665bc@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Oh dear!!! Judith will be upset... Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:11:24 -0700 (PDT) References:  <74n7jiF14e0u2U1@mid.individual.net> <76a810b2-7d2f-44c5-915c-e7e39d31843a@l1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>  <74oa0qF14kdubU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 32 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.154.122.73 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240089084 20912 127.0.0.1 (18 Apr 2009 21:11:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.154.122.73; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2838 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:696451

On Apr 16, 9:54=A0am, Matt B  wrote: > Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:00:44 -0700 (PDT), Nick L Plate > >  wrote: > > >> More reporting done here because of the specifics due to possible/ > >> actual personal injury? =A0And a general reporting for any damage caus= ed > >> by a vehicle licenced or used on the highway wherever it may have > >> occured. =A0Accessible from a public highway, so its public says BB > > > There was a change in the way stats were collected, but there is no > > doubt that France achieved a substantial relative improvement through > > greatly increased enforcement of traffic law while we pandered pretty > > shamelessly to the motor lobby (e.g. painting the cameras yellow), so > > maybe there's something in it after all. > > > Mind, the loss in trend of which Matt speaks appears to affect mainly > > motorcyclists. > > That doesn't explain the loss compared to our European neighbours, as > their m/c trends are similar to ours, and our speed limit compliance is > better than theirs.

Oh look. No reply from Crapman. He knows he can't win the argument; he knows cameras don't really make the roads safer, and he only supports them because he hates motorists. There can't be anyone left on this newsgroup who doesn't know that by now, even if he and his pathetic fans are still refusing to admit it.