Nuxx:14af51ef-0c95-4baa-bf1b-9c9e2c0c5d97@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <14af51ef-0c95-4baa-bf1b-9c9e2c0c5d97@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Chapman: His Agenda Exposed Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 07:17:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <0f3fd3c5-7db2-47aa-bbd5-bbbae629d329@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6fg1d3FbcseoU1@mid.individual.net> <96o5941n82ql2iacpfcr2p051ck8u3shdl@4ax.com>   Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217600227 25462 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 14:17:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2653 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:660170

On Aug 1, 1:58 pm, judith  wrote: > On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:35:37 +0100, Paul Boyd  > wrote: > > >judith said the following on 01/08/2008 11:13: > > >> He's put words in my mouth > > >That's rich, coming from you! > > and you can substantiate that just how please?

We all know that you won't get any kind of adequate answer to that. It's rather depressing when you can confidently predict such a thing every time you ask one of the motorist-haters to post anything that actually demonstrates and/or means something. Whether on urc, or other transport-related forums, one of the principle "weapons" of the anti-motorist crowd is the generalised slur*, always presented without a shred of evidence. It's just another way in which they attempt to distract from the real debate. Still, I suppose it is a bit naive to expect reasonable and decent behaviour from those who support cameras in the full knowledge that they kill people.

-- (who also used it to describe motorist-hating trolls' posts). Wow, a whole two words. Is this justification for accusing me of never coming up with my own stuff? Maybe not, but you don't tend to let the facts get in the way, do you?
 * Yes, Crapman, I did indeed get "generalised slur" from Paul Smith