Nuxx:0701ecfd-5d6c-4185-80b4-00fe06745c52@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <0701ecfd-5d6c-4185-80b4-00fe06745c52@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Yesterday's ride 3:30 Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:08:00 -0700 (PDT) References: <8%FLl.8686$iK7.7569@newsfe08.ams2> <49ff3482$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <49ff5370$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com> Lines: 24 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.208.50 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241478480 21625 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2009 23:08:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.208.50; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2268 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:699504

On May 4, 9:43=A0pm, Tosspot  wrote: > burtthebike wrote: > > > "Tosspot"  wrote in message > >news:49ff3482$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com... > > >> Hope the sod gets tugged. =A0Most are fine, but the few are a real pai= n. > >> I liked the guy that complained about you holding him up and stopped > >> to argue. =A0Class. > > >> I'm beginning to wonder about carrying a camera for the incidents. > > > I had a camera, you just don't have time to use it, unless you're > > talking about a constantly running video camera? > > Was thinking of a compact digital. =A0Oh well, back to a pen and paper > noting numberplates then.

Or you could stop sanctimoniously causing friction with motorists and just accept that they have as much of a right to be there as you do. (And even if you don't accept that, do you really think that engineering conflict is the best way of getting motorists off the road?)