Nuxx:49264b26-a19d-4f48-a143-8a678cfc3c7b@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <49264b26-a19d-4f48-a143-8a678cfc3c7b@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.transport Subject: Re: Lords reject London anti-bike chaining law Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:04:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <7f4eca40-e374-4e61-9e55-9c1b1f8450e7@t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>  <76868a11-d02e-4df3-a0d1-27a401e47851@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <67837f30-02c4-4712-93ad-c463807740af@v39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 23 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.147 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237439047 30358 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2009 05:04:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.147; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2701 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:690031

On Mar 18, 4:01=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:15:16 -0700 (PDT), Mike P >  said in > <67837f30-02c4-4712-93ad-c46380774...@v39g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>: > > >Do you know WHY they "street garage" Doug? It's because green fuckwits > >on councils led by government guidlelines decided to build smaller > >garages to try and tempt people not to use cars. So there's all these > >garages that CARS CAN'T FIT INTO. > > You can't fit cars into my garage because it's full of things that > (unlike the car) are not waterproof. =A0My priceless collection of > come-in-handy wood, for example.

Neatly avoiding the point, as always. You know perfectly well that current rules dictate that new residential developments provide inadequate parking in yet another completely failed attempt to bully people out of their cars. But admitting that would be admitting that anti-motorist measures exist in this country, and you don't want to do that, do you? Much better to pretend that neither you nor the government has any sort of problem with cars. Like anyone actually believes that.