Nuxx:Ef34f3c5-a752-4cee-85e2-227b6e1e0c19@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:07:51 -0700 (PDT) References:  <0338e076-d31c-4b99-b60b-a25e81a986d9@f10g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <1j1uakt.8i3odq8d2nihN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  <4a432c93$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com> <1j1v6jn.1cibqslpt5bvvN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> <4a437bda$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com> <1j1vhef.1igetn7wi0og0N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> <4a4399a6$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <4a43e2b7_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <1j1vzvl.6arczz2htgffN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  <1j1x23t.10oie3c1mwdurkN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  <1j1x4oe.4vj1rbzc9gflN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  Lines: 19 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1246050471 5407 127.0.0.1 (26 Jun 2009 21:07:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2988 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:54117 uk.rec.cycling:5664

On Jun 26, 7:25=A0pm, Danny Colyer  wrote: > On 26/06/2009 12:53, Steve Firth wrote: > > > I made a perfectly reasonable observation that there was a > > prevailing view in URC... > > I am still under the impression that you don't actually read urc, but > rather see only cross-posted threads (generally cross-posted by trolls, > for trolling purposes). > > If my impression is correct, how could you possibly know what, if > anything, counts as a prevailing view in urc?

Because it's all the same emotive, car-hating, opinionated, factually incorrect bollocks again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again, that's how.