Nuxx:8e98e51e-9579-437e-8e86-48871420d975@n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <8e98e51e-9579-437e-8e86-48871420d975@n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM - advice required please - a ban is pending!!! Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:13:33 -0700 (PDT) References: <8vua2nFhi4U3@mid.individual.net>  <8vue1vFjb9U1@mid.individual.net> <1p0kp6ppesi2amgmf28idplt7a9lfcg11i@4ax.com> <8vugr1FaaoU1@mid.individual.net>  <1oMmp.4426$ZU7.3760@newsfe11.ams2>  Lines: 35 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1302045213 29244 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2011 23:13:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n10g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2654 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:40363

On Apr 5, 11:18=A0pm, Tony  wrote: > In uk.net.news.moderation, "Just zis Guy, you know?" > > > >  wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > >On 04/04/2011 22:55, Geoff Berrow wrote: > > >>> I don't /feel/ they were repetitious, I can see they are. =A0As in > >>> they made a point that had already been made again. =A0And again, and > >>> again and again. > > >> And will doubtless keep making it while people continue to respond to > >> him. =A0 > >> But I bet he wouldn't make it again if people didn't respond. > > >Yes he bloody would. The thing is, you see, we're /wrong/, at least > >according to Matt, so we have to be /corrected/ every time we say > >something that runs counter to the One Truth. > > So? > > Don't reply. =A0He replies, you just ignore it.

Just a hunch but ISTR someone saying the same thing to Chapman before. It may even have happened a couple of (thousand) times.

Three little words: Chapman, never, learns. (He knows it all already so he never even tries to learn from anyone else. That would be a sign of weakness.)

Anyone going to tell me I'm wrong?