Nuxx:C9b8572c-e5b9-4d01-af8a-4a52700c0058@f30g2000yqa.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f30g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM - advice required please - a ban is pending!!! Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 16:10:31 -0700 (PDT) References: <8vua2nFhi4U3@mid.individual.net>  <8vue1vFjb9U1@mid.individual.net> <1p0kp6ppesi2amgmf28idplt7a9lfcg11i@4ax.com> <8vugr1FaaoU1@mid.individual.net>  <1oMmp.4426$ZU7.3760@newsfe11.ams2> Lines: 42 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1302045032 27392 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2011 23:10:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 23:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f30g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3610 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:40362

On Apr 5, 11:06=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/04/2011 22:55, Geoff Berrow wrote: > > >> I don't /feel/ they were repetitious, I can see they are. =A0As in > >> they made a point that had already been made again. =A0And again, and > >> again and again. > > And will doubtless keep making it while people continue to respond to > > him. =A0 > > But I bet he wouldn't make it again if people didn't respond. > > Yes he bloody would. The thing is, you see, we're /wrong/, at least > according to Matt, so we have to be /corrected/ every time we say > something that runs counter to the One Truth.

As per usual when you accuse someone of something, you do it to a greater extent than they do. I this case I think you call it "setting the record straight". A lot of people think you destroyed URC by doing it so much before URCM; now you have returned to URC to do it all over again, because you couldn't have people being "wrong" (right), even on a newsgroup that you no longer read.

No-one, least of all Matt B, can be allowed to show that actually, making things harder for motorists is not an essential part of making things safer for cyclists. Why won't you let anyone show that? Because you *know they're right*, and you can't bear it, so strong is your irrational, emotive urge to stop everyone driving. That is your issue, Chapman, and it's really time that you dealt with it rather than inflicting it on Matt B, scapegoating him and shooting the messenger because you can't hack the fact that your anti-motorist mission isn't supported by the facts, and complaining (publicly and privately) about his posts when they're as much about cycling as yours are (and make a good deal more sense).

You even still try to "set the record straight" in relation to things that Judith and I say, even if you don't reply to us directly (and you "don't read" our posts). That XKCD cartoon applies to you more than it does anyone else here, by far. No-one else is as determined not to let any heretical statement go unchallenged, in any subthread, ever.