Nuxx:F3076202-615e-4229-9cfe-7cc159356d49@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Let's Hear It Then Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) References: <8a88c202-d320-4628-bb5c-300c204407f6@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>  <6nl5cp998c32$.2o4vdxj92drp$.dlg@40tude.net> Lines: 43 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.204.241 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1208089580 29100 127.0.0.1 (13 Apr 2008 12:26:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 12:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.204.241; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080311 Firefox/2.0.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3444 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:646966

On Apr 12, 10:41 am, _  wrote: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:33:33 +0100, Tom Crispin wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:50:19 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar > >  wrote: > > >>I'll be angry until every last one has gone. > > > Paul Smith died an angry man. How sad. Some say his anger killed > > him. How tragic. > > Well, that could be useful - claim that he was driving. > > His idea, after all....

I knew it was a non-starter. I try to get the trolls to discuss the real stuff, instead of the tired, idiotic diversions, and what happens? A troll replies with one of the most tired and idiotic diversions ever. Oh well, at least I've proved that the trolls have absolutely nothing else except the diversions, i.e. they know that cameras aren't saving lives. This troll, like Crapman, has just proved that he only likes cameras because they bully safe motorists off the road. So, like Crapman, this troll is a vile, selfish cunt.

I trust that "_" will be complaining to the BBC and the Guardian, among others, since that's where Paul got the above information from (i.e. it wasn't "his idea"). What's that, troll? You don't really care, because it was just an excuse to criticise Safe Speed, and you're not really outraged by the information itself at all? Why would you be trying to find excuses to criticise Safe Speed? Is it because you know you can't criticise what they say about cameras? In that case, why do you hate Safe Speed and support cameras at all? Is it because you prioritise persecuting motorists above saving lives, i.e. you're a vile, selfish cunt?

So that's settled then. Anyone who attempts to criticise Safe Speed by mentioning that information which Paul got from the BBC and the Guardian is saying "I criticise Safe Speed about peripheral, spurious issues that I don't actually care about, because I'm just trying to find any excuse to have a go at Safe Speed despite knowing that they're right about cameras, since I'm a vile, selfish cunt who cares more about persecuting motorists than saving lives". Well done for admitting it, "_".