Nuxx:5c1cb951-5539-42c4-85f2-309669a09dbe@r34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <5c1cb951-5539-42c4-85f2-309669a09dbe@r34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: OT: Wind farm NIMBYs Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:11:08 -0700 (PDT) References:  <2l2g055ku3mk1avj5039fq0gn015js5a7n@4ax.com>  Lines: 49 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.145.66.20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242177068 12315 127.0.0.1 (13 May 2009 01:11:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r34g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.145.66.20; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3349 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:829218

On May 11, 12:33=A0pm, "Simon Mason"  wrote: > "Judith Smith"  wrote in message > > news:2l2g055ku3mk1avj5039fq0gn015js5a7n@4ax.com... > > > On Mon, 11 May 2009 10:51:56 +0100, "Simon Mason" > >  wrote: > > >>A letter published in our local paper the other day in reply to people = who > >>used silly arguments to oppose wind farms. > > >>http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/zwind.jpg > > > And you call me a troll. > > When? If anything I have ignored several posters who have asked me not to > reply to you. > > > > > Would it be of any interest if I posted OT material in here? > > If you and Nuxxy actually put OT in the header, then yes. That way people > could choose whether they wanted to read it or not. That is the purpose o= f > putting OT there. Could you get Nuxxy to do this please, or are you being > selective as to what OT stuff you are happy with and OT stuff you don't w= ish > to see?

I'll start doing that (even though it's entirely obvious what the topics I start are about from the subject line), as soon as you tell Fuckwit, in public, to do the same thing with its OT topics (and get it to agree). It won't, of course, at least not with good grace, because it doesn't really mind threads being off-topic, it only complains about it as an excuse to moan about its opponents' posts (how dare anyone even have a different POV to it, let alone post it, and in its newsgroup as well!) And anyway, as head moderator it can do what it wants: *others* should be obeying *it*, without question.

Get Fuckwit Murdering Lying Universally Despised Son of a Paedo to agree to put "OT" in subject lines of OT topics that it starts, and I'll agree to do the same, not because it's demanded it, but because you have asked for it and I believe that your motives (unlike its) are genuine. (It goes without saying that any boasting from it that it "made me do it" or anything similar will result in the "OT"s disappearing again.)