Nuxx:74fdcc0a-036d-4dca-a90e-111840188e64@f18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <74fdcc0a-036d-4dca-a90e-111840188e64@f18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Spindrift: "Vile Car-Hating Fanatic" (Not Said By Me) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 06:17:57 -0800 (PST) References: <30f5b32b-8ca4-4f1e-b146-08d44e210a28@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <770a72c3-4ea5-4498-8bf3-1acdb05d240a@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com>  <10d5715f-10fc-4832-a0ee-a0833c50de91@m16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 43 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.151.152.80 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1233238677 4337 127.0.0.1 (29 Jan 2009 14:17:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:17:57 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f18g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.151.152.80; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3235 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:684216

On Jan 28, 11:08=A0am, _  wrote: > Nuxx Bar wrote: > > On Jan 27, 3:16 pm, _  wrote: > >> On the offchance that these are geniune questions and not simply a ran= t, > > > There is never anything remotely genuine about anything that Spindrift > > posts. > > >> I'd ask similar questions about this very newsgroup. I will start thou= gh > >> by saying that I do agree with you that wishing someone cancer is more > >> than a bit OTT (with the notable exception of Duhg, who whines on abou= t > >> animal testing of drugs and how he feels that people should just suffe= r > >> with what they've got). But back on point, what you seem to have > >> suffered there is the result of entrenched positions. Whoever you had > >> issue with was adamant in his point, and unwilling to concede there ev= en > >> WAS an alternative view. Does that sound familiar yet? > > >> Despite what some here believe, I'm not nuxx and I have plenty of easi= ly > >> verifiable history of online presence. I'm reasonably educated and an > >> experienced professional in my business, so while I might well be > >> contentious, I'm certainly not a dribbling moron. > > > Err...I'm educated and professional as well actually. =A0 > > Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there - I was not trying to insinuate you > weren't. > > > And my posting > > style here is not employed elsewhere, it's just that when I'm talking > > to a bunch of crazed, lying motorist-haters, I find it pointless > > trying to be remotely tactful or subtle. > > *Thats* what I *was* attempting to insinuate - if someone screams and > rants, by all means think he's a halfwit, but at the same time wonder > what on Earth has made him so furious. No smoke, and all that.

All understood. :-)