Nuxx:7ec564f1-e660-4288-bfcf-0e56b3474c6e@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <7ec564f1-e660-4288-bfcf-0e56b3474c6e@m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Do *You* Hate Motorists? Take The Test Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 06:06:25 -0700 (PDT) References:  <321bdc23-ce95-496b-be20-283e89a1fcd5@u39g2000pru.googlegroups.com>  <81e8b70d-c7cc-465f-aea2-1865adb2dfcd@k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>   <1iyvkl4.1u61dmfvqltjdN%NEWS@wodger.demon.co.uk> <9m2hv49miejts5cfjtlkn2u5l4d3gk5m4q@4ax.com>  Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.154.123.12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241355985 24612 127.0.0.1 (3 May 2009 13:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m24g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.154.123.12; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2986 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:829057

On Apr 29, 6:50=A0pm, thaksin  wrote: > Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:06:53 +0000, N...@= wodger.demon.co.uk (Roger > > Merriman) wrote: > > >> get a client that auto kills all followups then? thats what mine does, > >> as nuxxy is not as nasty as judit i tend to just put him in a rolling = 30 > >> days when he gets too much. > > > For values of "not as nasty" that include phoning in the small hours > > to shout "murderer". =A0In terms of malice I don't think there is a lot > > to choose between the two. =A0Actually since both of them are fact-blin= d > > agenda-driven nutcases it is not even that interesting to speculate on > > what differences there might be, I suspect. > > You really are determined to provoke, aren't you Guy? Lets hope you > still feel smug when your scattergun unpleasantness hits a _real_ > "nasty" person and they pay you a visit, eh?

Couldn't agree more, but it's useless trying to tell him. "Scattergun unpleasantness" is an excellent way of describing him though. Oh BTW, you'll now be branded a "troll" for daring to disagree with the URC "moderator".

(I of course made no such phone calls, and he has no proof otherwise. I've commenced legal action against him for his continued slander to the contrary.)