Nuxx:MPG.262a5e2f33f5f20d989731@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Question for URCM Moderators Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 11:07:50 +0100 Lines: 8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100409-1, 09/04/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 0e0cfb6d.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=b[nI]9n2gCHYW7lQM;eP^A0g@SS;SF6nGR9OH0:RnENDif50d?e;NTD`:ITG5aA:cGb]DoHDH`oKB X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 1257 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:29270

Could someone please comment on why this post from Chapman was manually approved when it was clearly inflammatory?

http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling.moderated/msg/6ad73266fa6c c5d0

If I had said "The one remaining question is why you're bothering to reply to Chapman" then would my post have got through?