Nuxx:MPG.2663a0d2dbafac4e98974f@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Request to URCM Moderators Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 21:32:11 +0100 References:       <85lmbgFdtaU1@mid.individual.net>  <272dnVedh6cNu2XWnZ2dnUVZ8m2dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> Lines: 35 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: e434351c.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=;iRkUc?e6>R:NKnQ:_cV[SYjZGX^207P[`, clive@xxxx-x.fsnet.co.uk says... > > On 22/05/2010 13:28, Dave J. wrote: > > > > If his name was Clive then that might be appropriate. As it's not and as > > from what I've seen he's not in the same bracket I think you should > > re-read the rest of that posting and maybe a couple of earlier ones. > > > > In fact, were it Clive I'd probably be 2nding you; plus the defensible > > parts wouldn't exist. I wonder if you've acquired the spectacles of > > preconception. > > And you can fuck right off too.

An awful lot of people seem to be under the "misconception" that you're sucking up to the moderators because you want to be one of them, don't they? However much that may irk you, the fact is that it's true. I know you and your ilk like to sweep inconvenient truths under the carpet (that of course being URCM's whole purpose), but I really think that in this case, your interests would be served by a quick statement that you are not in fact hoping to become a URCM moderator. Such a statement would do you far more favours than "fuck right off".

Except that you can't truthfully make such a statement, can you? No wonder you're getting so hot under the collar. Not only is your continued sycophancy not having the desired effect but it's making you look singularly pathetic to a wide range of posters (not all of whom you can dismiss as "trolls"). How long are you going to carry on with this brown-nosing before you give up and (maybe) save a modicum of face?

However much you dislike me, you know I'm right, which no doubt stresses you even further. So do something to get yourself out of the situation. Your current approach is doing nothing for you except turning you into a laughing stock, so best change it PDQ. Yes?