Nuxx:1kdg25tb5i8d4p1tuonlr9u1lr9u3bp8lc@4ax.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.k-dsl.de!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe20.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID: <1kdg25tb5i8d4p1tuonlr9u1lr9u3bp8lc@4ax.com> From: for_chappers@null.null Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:04:54 +0100 References:  	<8q5f25t30lvkhmkuap4595krql6kaoner0@4ax.com>  	<$IkZrLmM87JKFws1@[127.0.0.1]>  	 <6nlf25pf38aa0tqdp123sutkm40u6mdptn@4ax.com> 	 <94089753-2475-432f-8bc6-a90cfb96f421@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 24 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.12.82.202 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe20.ams2 1244149509 86.12.82.202 (Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:05:09 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:05:09 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2772 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:53016 uk.rec.cycling:4902

On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:11:40 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:51:03 +0100, Roger Thorpe > wrote: > >>yes I agree. In fact I had thought it was there. At the risk of seeming >>to be too PC could we call them something like 'allow list' and 'block >>list'? I realise that it may be only me that's bothered by it. > >There has been a lot of debate around the Wikimedia foundation about >the names of the blacklists and whitelists. Although nobody can quite >work out how to fix the issue, it is widely agreed that being on a >thing called "blacklist"[1] causes distress to some people. Care >should be exercised in moving someone from the mod list to any >blacklist. I can only think of three individuals presently active >here, Nuxx, judith and nully. And even then it would need to be on >the basis of what they posted there, not in urc. > One has to wonder whether Guy is SO full of himself that he genuinely doesn't recognise what a pompous wanker he comes across as! Do you think YOU should be on the blacklist, Guy, based on the abusive posts you've made here? Or even just based on the fact that half the reg's here have given up with you and dumped you in their killfiles?