Nuxx:MPG.279de15332d3d3b989871@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!shaftesbury.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Comments from URCM moderators and my reponse Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 05:17:41 -0000 References: <09e6bb69-2e74-42b3-aea7-75061b96e510@t23g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <4d337a0b$0$1531$c3e8da3$fb483528@news.astraweb.com> <4d33876b$0$6878$c3e8da3$fb483528@news.astraweb.com>  Lines: 30 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: be01f835.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=\fmHjNHBOndBPKC8bc3\Umnok4Z\, ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk says... > > Yes. I think it was me but I can't be bothered to look it up. I > certainly rejected a great many articles by Toom.

"look it up"? So when it was previously stated that you were unable to look up which moderator had rejected a particular post, that was an outright lie?

That's the trouble with lying: you have to remember which lies you've told and ensure that you're consistent in the future. Yet another way in which the URCM moderators have failed miserably.

> >Perhaps you would like to answer my question. Why was the original post > >rejected? > > Because it was Toom repeating himself.

Superb. "Why did you reject that post with the excuse 'reject repetition'?" "Because it was Toom repeating himself."

No-one could possibly not conclude that you're completely unwilling to elaborate on the rejection reason, and most are likely to conclude that that's because the real reason is "We want to suppress the views in the post", i.e. the reason for most URCM rejections.

URCM: the most heavily criticised moderated newsgroup in the history of usenet, and proof positive of how unreasonable and parochial psycholists are.