Nuxx:MPG.26fe7eeddbe3094e9897f3@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Nominations invited for new moderators Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:47:26 +0100 References: <8f2hl4Ft9jU1@mid.individual.net>       <5EsBxIMSAojMFwU8@[127.0.0.1]>     Lines: 35 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100917-1, 17/09/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 164b87bd.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=?k[oa^?daJj6Y=L7eg6j[]3=5MZZm`:ITG5aA:cg2EC<]<4KA7n X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 2869 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:33575

In article , tcnw71@blackhole.do-not- spam.me.uk says... > > Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:31:24  > uk.net.news.moderation Nuxx Bar  > > >In article <ovat86l0hf7jokha5u7poo8sfjgc0qns7e@4ax.com>, jmsmith2010 > >@live.co.uk says... > >> > >> "I think that is an important distinction" - indeed it is - we two are > >> just not as stupid as you. > > > >You mustn't make hurtful remarks about Guy. He's very sensitive. > > I find your comment less than useful.

I've got to be honest, I don't really care. If Chapman's going to make sneering remarks about people half the time, then pretend to be hypersensitive the other half of the time when people say things back, then I have every right to point that out.

> If you are going to be on JMS's > side just say so and be done with it.

You know I usually agree with JMS. I'm in no way trying to hide that. She's a hell of a lot more honest than Chapman (the "Christian"), that's for sure.

> You did present a list, Nuxx, that was worth reading; do you really want > JMS as support?

If that's an attempt to divide us then it's pretty rubbish isn't it? Most of JMS's posts (particular about Chapman) are right on the money, and a lot of them are pretty amusing as well. You're not going to change my opinion of her so you might as well stop trying.