Nuxx:B2a06488-88e9-4336-bb69-abaa132d3d07@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.config,uk.transport.buses Subject: Re: Censorship in uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:55:37 -0700 (PDT) References:   <05oc55hove7buoe5ol4ubs2fe7p7auf8k1@4ax.com>  <7bpq34F20n748U1@mid.individual.net>  <7bqq99F243karU1@mid.individual.net> <3edf24f1-5e0c-4041-9080-54d7ee8f5435@t21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <7brfgbF24cnsrU1@mid.individual.net>  <09d552c5-700d-4b5f-a31b-d1deb4c10940@o36g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <7btighF24sti5U1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 10 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247396137 16290 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2009 10:55:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2292 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:7116 uk.net.news.config:56014 uk.transport.buses:45

On Jul 12, 8:43=A0am, Matt B  wrote: > The content sounded quite plausible though. ;-)

Yes, in fact it sounded exactly like what Chapman thinks (and has said). I thought the whole point of forging someone's posts was to say things that they *wouldn't* say.

It's possible that Chapman made that post, then decided (for some reason) that he wanted to retract it, so being unable to retract it, he claimed it was a "forgery" instead.