Nuxx:C7d4e9ec-8820-4864-a18e-1712f52f8099@w36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!w36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM is now working pretty well on the whole Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:52:29 -0800 (PST) References:    <1c0dm656abu5cb5i5q15r5saa9oeq3hnn5@4ax.com> <1jx7bxi.prxj5027n83rN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> <8b2dm6p7rsfig3ph3qnbknaa0vdfrp7dl8@4ax.com> <1jx7d08.11lk0kk1tcc8b6N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>     <1jx7fhq.546wej11ue600N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> Lines: 14 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298569949 19674 127.0.0.1 (24 Feb 2011 17:52:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2416 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:37880

On Feb 24, 5:38=A0pm, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote: > > I'd be interested to know if other people agree that moderation in UCRM > (apart from the issue of the ban) is working satisfactorily.

I know you don't mean me, but to be honest, it's not *too* bad at the moment considering how it has been. There is certainly still room for improvement, but the fact that the likes of Ace and Jackson are bitterly objecting to the amount of tolerance and evenhandedness being displayed is in itself a very good sign.

Jackson won't stand for this defiance on his server though, so while he's "in charge", it won't last.