Nuxx:758494eb-8865-4527-9ea4-d1bc66ed7b5c@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <758494eb-8865-4527-9ea4-d1bc66ed7b5c@d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:32:43 -0700 (PDT) References: <1j0pdfw.jl9zy61kp6rshN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  <8$cpm9EgSEKKFwG1@[127.0.0.1]> <78r12aF1ngb1iU1@mid.individual.net>  <39qi259ef67cfbf5va35g128lg25rv2bm9@4ax.com>  <45405b45-80f0-4814-986a-ea65ed62374e@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>  <14ok259mou91lc5qpncbloddrst93rvu1i@4ax.com>   Lines: 10 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244993563 21608 127.0.0.1 (14 Jun 2009 15:32:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d2g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2229 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:53486 uk.rec.cycling:5306

On Jun 14, 1:38=A0pm, "The Happy Hippy"  wrote: > > If a moderated group were proposed with any intent of preventing certain > people posting I would vote against its creation.

Then you need to vote against it regardless of what is in the proposal, as preventing certain people from posting is *exactly* why the new group is being created, and that remains the case no matter what is written to the contrary.