Nuxx:3f43a77e-15e1-4796-8573-b6ac12b87290@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3f43a77e-15e1-4796-8573-b6ac12b87290@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Moderated cycling group : posts rejected Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:36:11 -0700 (PDT) References:   <70d68018-6232-4690-b167-e5c9bb587637@u8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 45 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301960171 4540 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2011 23:36:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3523 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:40153

On Apr 4, 9:59=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/04/2011 18:17, Simon Mason wrote: > > > Or try using another address other than a live.co.uk one. ;-) > > What a coincidence. Uses live.co.uk and posts via BT's Giganews feed, > just like JMS. Small world...

You just can't resist making your shit-stirring, provocative comments, can you? However much you make out that you're whiter than white, and the victim in all this, and all you want is for people like Judith and me to stop being so horrible to you, the simple truth (as anyone can, and usually does, see) is that you enjoy a fight more than *anyone* else here, you'll do anything to perpetuate the situation, and all your "Oh woe is me, I'm being bullied and persecuted" nonsense is just that. No-one who is anyone falls for your victim mentality or your protests that you "never reply" to either of us (as you well know, and have just demonstrated, it's quite possible to keep things on the boil without responding directly).

kat suggested the other day that you should sign a truce with each of us. I'm happy to do so if you are. But you don't want to, do you? It would be your worst nightmare to no longer have anyone on here to poke sharp sticks at whenever you felt like it. After all, you've (mysteriously enough) got such "archenemies" on every other online space which you frequent.

Anyway, the offer of a truce is open if and when you want to take it up. I was thinking of asking kat to ask you on my behalf, so that you couldn't pretend not to have read my offer, and your point blank reluctance would be there for all to see. Thereagain there's probably not much point, since everyone who is remotely reasonable has already worked out that you are the one who is most keen by far to fan the flames and maintain the belligerence. I will still think about asking kat; however the point is that you could end it any time you wanted to...if you wanted to.

> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmjE0AAoJEJx9ogI8T+W/SCkIAIyZadl9uXK7+oeIHuNur/0g

Oh, DJ04JD8332vea56rb68679dny87nay87yn7YN879ny789yth5rV47EV67m to you too.