Nuxx:Fa6a71a8-24cd-481f-9699-afbf9a955465@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Chapman: His Agenda Exposed Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 06:56:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <0f3fd3c5-7db2-47aa-bbd5-bbbae629d329@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6fg1d3FbcseoU1@mid.individual.net> <96o5941n82ql2iacpfcr2p051ck8u3shdl@4ax.com>   <14af51ef-0c95-4baa-bf1b-9c9e2c0c5d97@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <63a21d78-c1b8-4eb0-b73e-e5eb01ae02ce@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> Lines: 62 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.129.172 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217685364 32303 127.0.0.1 (2 Aug 2008 13:56:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.129.172; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4393 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:660345

On Aug 1, 3:28 pm, spindrift  wrote: > On Aug 1, 3:17 pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > > > On Aug 1, 1:58 pm, judith  wrote: > > > > On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:35:37 +0100, Paul Boyd  > > > wrote: > > > > >judith said the following on 01/08/2008 11:13: > > > > >> He's put words in my mouth > > > > >That's rich, coming from you! > > > > and you can substantiate that just how please? > > > We all know that you won't get any kind of adequate answer to that. > > It's rather depressing when you can confidently predict such a thing > > every time you ask one of the motorist-haters to post anything that > > actually demonstrates and/or means something. Whether on urc, or > > other transport-related forums, one of the principle "weapons" of the > > anti-motorist crowd is the generalised slur*, always presented without > > a shred of evidence. It's just another way in which they attempt to > > distract from the real debate. Still, I suppose it is a bit naive to > > expect reasonable and decent behaviour from those who support cameras > > in the full knowledge that they kill people. > > > -- > > * Yes, Crapman, I did indeed get "generalised slur" from Paul Smith > > (who also used it to describe motorist-hating trolls' posts). Wow, a > > whole two words. Is this justification for accusing me of never > > coming up with my own stuff? Maybe not, but you don't tend to let the > > facts get in the way, do you? > > Tell you what bozo, get the person making these allegations to come > here and make them directly without using you as a faceless accuser. > Who are they? What's supposed to have happened? Where? > > Sixth time.

You're actually proud of what you've done, aren't you? That's why you keep following me around and bringing it up all over the place. I knew you were sick but this is a new low.

As I've said repeatedly (for at least the "sixth time" I believe...thanks for keeping count), I'm not going to name the person, because it's not my place to. Any further posts in which you tell me to do so will be ignored. Who do you think you are anyway, barking orders at me?

And talking of who you are, I happen to know someone at CitySprint's head office, and I'll be asking them to find out your name and email address from the email you sent...that'll teach you to maliciously conspire with other motorist-haters to make up fanciful complaints about drivers who you don't like because they dare to overtake you when it's safe to do so. (Can't have drivers going faster than cyclists, especially in London, can we?) Sir Jeremy was right, you were wanking off when you made that complaint, and you insult the intelligence of everyone in this newsgroup by making out that it gave you no pleasure to get the driver into trouble.