Nuxx:28b228fe-4b34-49e5-abb3-c002541b9480@l2g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l2g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <28b228fe-4b34-49e5-abb3-c002541b9480@l2g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:38:16 -0700 (PDT) References: <1j1u97n.1d082hx1dhlfiaN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> <4a432c93$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com> <1j1v6jn.1cibqslpt5bvvN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> <4a437bda$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com> <1j1vhef.1igetn7wi0og0N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> <4a4399a6$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <4a43e2b7_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <1j1vzvl.6arczz2htgffN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>   <7akbp9F1vvggkU1@mid.individual.net>  <1j1xn9c.qo0v4mjgvk9tN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>    <1j26vk8.3rsxxy14zjdkfN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> Lines: 16 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.153.43.239 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1246491497 29749 127.0.0.1 (1 Jul 2009 23:38:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l2g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.153.43.239; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2967 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:55014 uk.rec.cycling:6413

On Jul 1, 7:07=A0pm, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > Tom Crispin  wrote: > > I think that he's referring to the thread where I showed Steve Frith > > that he was more likely to die within the next three seconds of heart > > failure than be involved in a collision with a cyclist sometime over > > the next 12 months. > > Oddly enough just three seconds after you made that point, and I proved > that you were wrong you had a Pram->Toy evacuation moment.

Now come come. A URC regular having a temper tantrum when they're proved wrong, rather than accepting it with good grace and thanking the person who proved them wrong for advancing their knowledge (the way that a true scientist would)? Next you'll be saying that that phenomenon is one of the main reasons why URC is FUBAR. All lies, and don't you dare say otherwise.