Nuxx:6i1j25h21h1u8ennqb7fqrvcqnea6grfc6@4ax.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe27.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID: <6i1j25h21h1u8ennqb7fqrvcqnea6grfc6@4ax.com> From: for_chappers@null.null Newsgroups: uk.transport.london,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: First two "Cycle Superhighway" routes announced Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:00:30 +0100 References: <52b9693b-224f-4bb2-aef0-e805679bb4af@d31g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>  <8e8ba3af-4dc2-4d1f-b433-ed3daea2594a@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 21 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.12.82.202 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe27.ams2 1244235659 86.12.82.202 (Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:00:59 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:00:59 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2099 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:707816

On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:44:16 +0100, Tom Barry  wrote:

>for_chappers@null.null wrote: > >> >> If YOU could be arsed to read you'd find that these are segregated >> lanes, i.e. dedicated for cycling. > >No they aren't, you bloody fool. Some of them are existing bus lanes, >some (for instance along the A13 for quite a long way) are high grade >segregated paths built [...]

So, "No they aren't (segregated paths)", followed by "some are segregated paths". No, you're right, I don't see any contradiction there at all. LOL! Boris might as well turf them over and plant geraniums - the 'hard case' cyclists always, always, ALWAYS ignore areas dedicated for their use. Ironically, they complain about cars, but then say they only use the primary part of the road because cars have swept them clear of debris!