Nuxx:06mg259pe2n1532g6sl5h4jg2m4l8bhi3r@4ax.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.k-dsl.de!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!69.16.177.254.MISMATCH!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe25.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID: <06mg259pe2n1532g6sl5h4jg2m4l8bhi3r@4ax.com> From: for_chappers@null.null Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 00:29:53 +0100 References:  <6nlf25pf38aa0tqdp123sutkm40u6mdptn@4ax.com>  <94089753-2475-432f-8bc6-a90cfb96f421@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <6oF*L9FIs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>   Lines: 22 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.12.82.202 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe25.ams2 1244158210 86.12.82.202 (Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:30:10 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:30:10 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2390 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:53064 uk.rec.cycling:4939

On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:20:11 +0100, "Wm..."  wrote:

>Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:40:10  >uk.net.news.config Alan Braggins  > >>If rejected posts are visible somewhere else, and someone who habitually >>posts rubbish makes a test on-topic post for a change in order to bleat >>about censorship when it get rejected, then the difference will be visible >>to readers of the rejected posts. (Including if the only rejected posts >>visible are those multi-posted to the unmoderated group.) > >Where you deliberately making that as convoluted as possible? > >>I don't consider this an adequate reason to encourage denial of service >>attacks by disallowing blocking by poster altogether. > >Denial of service attacks are significantly more important than any >moderation issue. Don't go there as serious net-copping may result.

Yawn, another netcop threat. Do excuse the rest of us while we snore, wont you?