Nuxx:A4afa1e9-00f4-498e-b379-04ab33ecd034@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Cambridge spelling gaffe. Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:32:21 -0700 (PDT) References: <4ICdnTGlMdbNBK7XnZ2dnUVZ8rqdnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>  <3d-dnZpMIsCbWK7XnZ2dnUVZ8ladnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>     <0fcd0ade-cd00-41e9-aa46-62dffef9759e@w3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 18 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245090746 18146 127.0.0.1 (15 Jun 2009 18:32:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2440 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:709995

On Jun 15, 8:46=A0am, Nobby Anderson  wrote: > Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > particular the allowing of Chapman to get away with murder (both > > figuratively and literally), are one of the main reasons for the > > Ooops. =A0How's the legal action agains Chapman going Nuxxy? =A0Was it li= bel > you were going after him for? =A0Any news yet?

Fine thanks. I'll let you know when there's progress.

At the end of the day, Chapman can't prove that I made any nuisance calls, so he has libelled me by claiming that I made them. It *is*, however, provable that Chapman advocates speed cameras despite knowing that they kill people, so it is arguable that he is a mass-murderer by proxy, meaning that calling him a murderer is not libel.

Happy, or shall I explain it in simpler terms?