Nuxx:MPG.262841bcc3fbcef4989725@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: "Just zis Guy, you know?"  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Query to URCM Moderaors. Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 20:41:20 +0100 References:  Lines: 29 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100408-1, 08/04/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 88713da5.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=_aV:?HBFNX>f0PeGg]Xii?0g@SS;SF6n7R9OH0:RnEN4Gfk7D_jF1X3`:ITG5aA:c7L_OSPmP\?H6 X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 2527 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:29242

In article , jmsmith2010 @live.co.uk says... > > Please could any one of you have the decency to explain - as you seem > to be leaderless at the moment.

Oh look. None of them have the decency to explain. Did we seriously think otherwise?

The continued arrogance and stubbornness is just unbelievable. Even after all the negative exposure in UNNM the "moderators" are *still* rejecting just as many posts for spurious reasons as before. They have no shame. They set out to crush awkward truths by censoring them so that's what they'll do, no matter who complains...it's "their" newsgroup after all, so people whinging on UNNM can go to hell, and are either ignored or insulted (unless they're deemed too important for that, in which case they get a token pretence that what they say is being taken seriously).

Anyone can balls something up, but to carry on with such disgusting, bullying behaviour when such a high percentage of respected posters are objecting to it just shows how utterly unpleasant and unreasonable Jackson and co are. They, like Chapman, think that admitting to being wrong about something in any way amounts to unacceptable weakness, so they never admit they're wrong, and as a result they will never voluntarily improve how URCM is being run (since as far as they're concerned it's fulfilling its function, censorship of inconvenient truths, perfectly). Therefore they have to be forcibly removed from power.