Nuxx:9d8b5916-9c77-4016-83b9-5c8aeb46d310@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <9d8b5916-9c77-4016-83b9-5c8aeb46d310@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Labyrinthine paranoia Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 01:12:48 -0700 (PDT) References:    <871w1ae288.fsf@toy.config>  <871w19d6e4.fsf@toy.config>  <4v2594pb403dgltij14pm76ee3c5r6pouk@4ax.com> Lines: 34 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217578368 24016 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 08:12:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2894 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:826935

On Aug 1, 5:08=A0am, judith  wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:49:49 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?" > >  wrote: > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:40:35 +0100, Daniel Barlow  > >said in <871w19d6e4....@toy.config>: > > >>"Other than the police and casualty writing, there is nothing on this > >>van that shows it is a speedtrap. " - well FUCKING DUH. =A0"Oh look, > >>there's a police van at the side of the road. =A0This would be a great > >>time to commit a crime as I drive past it" > > >And the funniest thing of all is that these idiots pretend this is > >all somehow new. =A0You know, of course, that the AA was founded in > >order to warn its members of speed traps, and that was the thick end > >of a century ago now. > > >Guy > > What was the CTC founded for - to tell people that cycle helmets are a > bad thing, a good thing, or that they just can't make up their mind? > > Do you still hold that: > > Wearing a Helmet: > Cyclists are more likely to hit their heads and helmets are > largely ineffective against the rotational forces implicated in the > worst brain injuries? > > (PS - this is in the category of those questions which you seem to > find too hard to answer; the list is coming along nicely; do you want > me to add inconsistencies in things you've said as well?)

You may need a hard drive upgrade. ;-)