Nuxx:MPG.2678bcdcc7379bcb989778@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news2.euro.net!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: URCM : Blocking is Permanent Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:48:05 +0100 References:   <874rcrFkilU1@mid.individual.net> <0fb212bc-25da-4910-b07e-d7a5256b0bec@y4g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>  <6ddb671b-92d1-43fb-be9c-a1ec56abadb3@d8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>   <65or06t1gn9583aokebrelo50tci3nag1u@4ax.com> <876h7pFm07U1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100608-1, 08/06/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 6e54ab20.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=nTJhcm6=SMk>Ld3Y]EVP9mYjZGX^207Pk`2D^>]Qb X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 2580 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:768665

In article <876h7pFm07U1@mid.individual.net>, p.j.clinch@dundee.ac.uk says... > > Tom Crispin wrote: > > > Wait until Peter Clinch gets into full flow - then you really will see > > junk... Like how, if you wear a helmet when cycling you should also > > wear a helmet when washing your hair! > > Ah, I see Tom is in his own full flow, misrepresenting things.

Uh oh. I think Clinch might be "fed up with you" again Tom. Best not post to URCM for a while in case he starts rejecting your posts out of spite again (I know you love posting there normally thanks to the unique, enlightened, totally uncontroversial "moderation" policy in place).

Really though, why not just confirm that it was him? What moral or legal obligation is there to protect him by being silent? Do you really feel that you owe him in any way? Especially after the SIX WEEKS it took for what was probably still an utterly perfunctory apology? I don't think he really regrets what he did...do you?