Nuxx:MPG.2688e5c63a035f4f98978d@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!81.171.88.15.MISMATCH!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM: Enough is Enough Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:58:46 +0100 References:   Lines: 18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100620-1, 20/06/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 17b7d1b9.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=@R8>o6EU5Q;]1IWQWQH1]80g@SS;SF6n7ogMo?V3Jo4>o4ZT7>iI3gnEj9oM1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 1977 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:31321

In article , tony@darkstorm.invalid says... > > In uk.net.news.moderation, Guy Cuthbertson  wrote: > > >I'd much prefer it if someone else with more experience/sway wrote an > >RFD to remedy the situation > > Apparently everyone would prefer it if someone else did the work.

Can't argue with that I suppose. I do genuinely think it would be much more effective if someone who 1) was experienced in these things and 2) had been uninvolved in URC to begin with (to prevent the usual disingenuous accusations from the usual suspects, in this case "You're only doing this because you wanted URCM to fail from the beginning" etc) were to do it, but I will do it if no-one else does. Regrettably it's necessary to stop URCM from being run as a private club where only the "right" opinions and posters are allowed.