Nuxx:1f03da65-f4a7-410a-be8e-17d1df3050a0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.sheds Subject: Re: What's this, then? Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 37 Message-ID: <1f03da65-f4a7-410a-be8e-17d1df3050a0@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> References:   <6ju6mvF52h9cU1@mid.individual.net>  <6ju912F56dmhU1@mid.individual.net>  <6jun65F57rp7U1@mid.individual.net> <208c80e5-5103-4de0-ab30-a1473529ff75@73g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>  <313030303432373948DA54BA33@zetnet.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.206.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222283440 31153 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2008 19:10:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.206.99; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3355 Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.rec.sheds:892421

On Sep 24, 2:54 pm, Guy King  wrote: > The message  > from Amethyst Deceiver  contains these words: > > > Crikey. Look chaps! It's troll - but it's a /literate/ troll!

Unlike you, it would seem (the "literate" part, not the "troll" part). Still, you're better than most here in that you do at least admit when one of your opponents is good at something (sometimes, at any rate). Most of the trolls here make out that I'm illiterate if anything, not because they think I am, but because they can't bear to be remotely complimentary towards me, however warranted it is. Hence, my literate posts are countered with "You're illiterate". It's YET ANOTHER incidence (how many have we had in this thread alone?) of the trolls here not being the slightest bit bothered about whether something is true or not; they simply say that something is the case because they *want* it to be. You have to admit that's a bit sad.

> Just 'cos he can put one apostrophe in the right place doesn't make him > literate.

That proves my point exactly. You will *never* admit that I'm literate, because you don't want it to be the case. You will *never* admit that speed cameras kill, because you'd rather they didn't (after all, the motorist scum would just have to put up with them then). You will *never* admit that Chapman is anything but a wonderful person, for the same reasons. Pathetic.

> Skipweasel

"Shitweasel" would be more appropriate, using "weasel" purely in the pejorative sense (actual weasels are rather fine, unlike your "good" self).

> Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

My goodness. A true fact. Steady on.