Nuxx:MPG.2664f4d3120407a1989753@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Questions for URCM Moderators re New Appointments Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 21:41:29 +0100 References:   <4dllv51qmdriiu909h9us22f26ij1pjrol@4ax.com> Lines: 26 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: ae52d9cf.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=T7O8\FR?PKYPdgCnnVi_QV0g@SS;SF6nW21?Hce@>g?VFd>O\6<]@7_3Jo4>o4ZT7^e7<7^QKLU, b.rogers@ifrance.com says... > > On Mon, 24 May 2010 19:37:54 +0100, Guy Cuthbertson >  wrote: > > > >URCM is a fucking joke and radical changes are needed. > > Not at all. If it keeps you out then it must be a good thing, no?

Err, except that it doesn't "keep me out" as I've had several posts there approved. Not that that's stopped the usual suspects from complaining about that...remember Chapman threw a tantrum when I said "Useless laws erode respect for the necessary ones"...I don't think he likes being reminded that his (and presumably your) support for unnecessarily low speed limits ultimately kills people by making it less likely that people will obey more legitimate restrictions.

Honestly, do you *ever* say anything that's actually correct? Your IQ level is around that of keitht's it would appear. But more intelligent people judge URCM on whether it is a properly-run newsgroup, rather than on how many of their enemies are "kept out" (or not). I guess it takes all sorts to make up this world, and I'm honestly very grateful that there are stupid people out there who do all the crappy jobs (those who can be bothered to work anyway). So here's to ya, "Ace" (or not).