Nuxx:25bddb27-89f0-4158-b47c-f9b7aca433e4@y3g2000vbh.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!y3g2000vbh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <25bddb27-89f0-4158-b47c-f9b7aca433e4@y3g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:25:32 -0800 (PST) References: <4_ydnZpOJKf8keXQnZ2dnUVZ8jKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>   <8trvqiFi12U1@mid.individual.net>  Lines: 26 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299767132 12922 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2011 14:25:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y3g2000vbh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2295 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38672

On Mar 10, 1:13=A0pm, Clive George  wrote: > On 10/03/2011 12:51, Matt B wrote: > > > On 10/03/2011 12:09, Ian Jackson wrote: > > >> But as moderators our duty is to serve the users, not > >> pander to our personal whims. > > > Ian, in that spirit, will you please answer the, as yet, unanswered > > questions raised here following the posting of the results of the "stra= w > > poll"? Of specific interest to me are: (a) precisely how many votes wer= e > > disallowed (and from whom)? (b) provide the responses to Q3. > > Who fucking cares?

If it's so unimportant then why are they so reluctant to tell us? Why are they generally so secretive?

> The result is the moderators have been asked to > moderate in the style you want. If they don't do that, call them on it th= en.

So that they can ignore the criticism yet again, and you can be their apologist yet again?