Nuxx:Bb4b67ad-46df-44dd-b9c6-bf8dd0cdc51f@k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Reject 'Meta' Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 15:44:01 -0800 (PST) References:       <20110228212617.652a3def@bluemoon>    Lines: 45 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299109441 31156 127.0.0.1 (2 Mar 2011 23:44:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 23:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3781 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38383

On Mar 2, 6:11=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > Tom, there is no point going round that loop again.

Guy, can you trim your replies please? (Especially given the PGP shite...doesn't that neatly show your complete lack of consideration for others?)

> Your support for Matt does you credit in theory

Not consistent with your usual attitude towards Matt B, but then we know that's just intolerance of his posting of thought-provoking arguments which go against your small-minded prejudices, of which there are a lot.

> and I think any good faith extended to the other two

You tried the "defending Nuxx" thing on Tom before and it didn't work, remember? He's a teacher and so I'm sure he's wise to juvenile and rather pathetic and deceitful attempts to manipulate his opinions.

> will only be exploited by them in furtherance of their agendas, which > have been pursued with a degree of spite and mendacity that is beyond > understanding given the unquestionable triviality of its roots.

There you go, trying to get sympathy again. How exactly would either of us "exploit" what Tom has said about us, even if we wanted to? In this case he hasn't even extended any "good faith" (for all I know he hates my guts), he simply pointed out *yet another* truth which you don't want to be mentioned: all of the initial "moderators" selected by Jackson did indeed have an intolerance of Judith, Matt B and me, and that's unlikely to have been a coincidence. Furthermore that intolerance was evident in hideously biased decisions from the very start, and of course you've enjoyed being able to, err, exploit that bias while pretending to think that it was all entirely fair.

I've developed an admiration for Tom in the last few months, as he is able to be truly objective, and call a spade a spade whether or not certain people want him to. No doubt you resent his recent Lou Knee- related revelations. Good on him for being consistently fair and reasonable...if more people were simply truthful and honest all the time whether or not they thought it would be good for "their side" or their opponents, I don't think we'd have got into this whole mess in the first place.