Nuxx:E8c14859-f867-4722-8711-70fe8b800585@u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:36:00 -0800 (PST) References: <4_ydnZpOJKf8keXQnZ2dnUVZ8jKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <3fd9f5fc-ab1e-4b80-8141-f8ca23c707d8@u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <1b69b10d-4e22-4938-8067-da805b1a0fb7@p12g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>    Lines: 28 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299872161 19682 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2011 19:36:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2638 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38801

On Mar 11, 2:41=A0am, "Wm..."  wrote: > Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:15:41  > uk.net.news.moderation Ian Jackson  > > >In article , > >Nuxx Bar =A0 wrote: > >>Do you think I should be banned from URCM? =A0Especially when the > >>"reason" given for that ban was a *suspicion* that I posted forgeries > >>to *UNNM*? > > >This is not correct. =A0Nuxx Bar's forging and nymshifting is > >(a) well-established and (b) extends to urcm too. > > >If Nuxx Bar gives permission we could post publicly the email > >notifying Nuxx Bar of the reasons for the ban. > > I'd like that.

Well I've given Jackson permission and he hasn't done anything. Why does everything connected with URCM take such a ridiculously long time (when it happens at all)? If he doesn't post it soon then I will instead, though I think people will be disappointed if they're expecting any new information.

(A fully comprehensible and non-weird article from you there, Wm! Steady on....)