Nuxx:F91cef66-d693-45ad-a33d-c41b31dded1e@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: fighting hate speech on uk.rec.cycling Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT) References: <7ae20e36ffc802c1f79cdc2fb1c8b18b@dizum.com>  Lines: 40 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243623480 7329 127.0.0.1 (29 May 2009 18:58:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3270 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:705360

On May 28, 7:03=A0pm, Judith M Smith  wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2009 17:10:04 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio > >  wrote: > >Here is a list of "google groups" links to Nuxx Barr's nastier > >posts. I encourage you to click on them and then click "more > >options" and "report this message" and fill in the abuse > >reporting form. "This appears to be hateful or violent content" > >should cover it. > > >If enough people complain, google will cancel his account. > > Thanks Guy - or do you prefer to be called Lou. > > You are a sad bastard.

Very. It once again goes to show that there are a large number of people on URC who simply cannot hack reading opinions that conflict with theirs, and will do *anything* they can to censor them. I was rather tiring of rubbish-correcting, car-hater-exposing and troll- baiting on here, and was thinking of taking a break, but the pathetic loser who started this thread has made me think again: we cannot let those who wish to suppress "awkward" opinions do so. If the numbskull in question was really just concerned about "foul language", "abuse" etc, they would be complaining about Chapman and a whole load of others, but no, they just complain about the likes of Judith and me. It's so screamingly obvious that they simply dislike the opinions that Judith and I post, and they're looking for an excuse to stop us from posting them. Well, they will never win.

Why is it that *everything* that "closet" car-haters say and do has to be so underhand, deceitful, mean-spirited, idiotic and dishonest? I suppose it's obvious really: someone would only hate cars in the first place, *and* decide to be dishonest about it and "play dirty" to get what they wanted, if they had the above character defects and much, much more besides. Every time they do something like this, they are just proving that point.

And I had no idea there was a "no swearing on usenet" rule. They'll be banning smoking in pubs next.