Nuxx:MPG.26755ab08f1574da989761@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news2.euro.net!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM : Blocking is Permanent Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 08:12:26 +0100 References: <86t4ldFp8jU1@mid.individual.net>  <86t5d9Ft7sU1@mid.individual.net> <3YOdnVTXQdA2_JTRnZ2dnUVZ8r0AAAAA@brightview.co.uk> <86tcd8F4thU1@mid.individual.net>      <965k069dp9csakbg6lt1fli9758cdvt1ud@4ax.com> Lines: 25 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100605-1, 05/06/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 6f17f963.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=WE\EW=>?PWIJb;NVcgkZoMYjZGX^207PK`, blthecat@ckdog.co.uk says... > > On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 00:55:21 +0100, Clive George >  wrote: > > >> People now know exactly why. The group was formed with the express > >> purpose of excluding the likes of Judith. > > > >I don't think so. More accurate would be that it was formed with the > >express purpose of excluding the bad behaviour Judith/JMS exhibited > >before and after the group's creation. > > My regret is that I did not take urc for long enough to see the extent > of this bad behaviour. It's clear to me now that the case for this > group was overstated.

I'd just like to say that that post and your previous one were absolutely excellent. No doubt me simply saying that will lower your reputation in the eyes of certain people...that's the kind of irrationality we're dealing with here, as I'm sure you've picked up on.

Thank goodness there are those in UNNM who were undoubtedly impartial and open-minded to start off with, but who now see URCM for what it is, and are prepared to say so.