Nuxx:C7bf19b8-dcab-4688-9b5f-3cd27be48e39@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: urcm helmets Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 06:51:03 -0800 (PST) References:   <8qi6r7FopU1@mid.individual.net> <-Il*5Owut@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>    <20110131123420.63e89930@bluemoon> <61ddk65f54mjti0q2b6f5r0ag53kqrpap7@4ax.com> <50vdk65euogb4paav29slf8j5vc10fs0cr@4ax.com> <8y+7Bb4Y9vRNFwTr@molly.mockford>  Lines: 25 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1296571863 30392 127.0.0.1 (1 Feb 2011 14:51:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2750 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:36603

On Jan 31, 7:11=A0pm, Tom Crispin  wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:28:40 +0000, Molly Mockford > >  wrote: > >At 18:15:45 on Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Tom Crispin > > wrote in > ><50vdk65euogb4paav29slf8j5vc10fs...@4ax.com>: > > >>Why not have three FAQs. An anti helmet faq, a pro choice faq, a pro > >>helmet faq and a pro compulsion faq. > > >...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope. > > ...And you may also note that I can't count...

I thought you were just pointing out that the anti-helmet "FAQ" wouldn't be a real FAQ at all, bearing in mind that one expects a FAQ to be factual, honest, without hidden agendas, etc. Oh yeah, and a FAQ involves actually being willing to answer rather than evade or censor difficult questions.

But anyway there'd be no-one to write such a FAQ since there are "no anti-helmet posters", clearly, since that's what one of the anti- helmet posters (I mean, "neutral posters") claims, so it absolutely must be true, just like when he claims not to be anti-motorist.