Nuxx:E7d9d836-d134-4d42-bd5c-11bc5bc14183@t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Another Motorist-Hating Freak, But At Least He Admits It Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:34:50 -0800 (PST) References: <24966046-3d0b-40b0-a355-9e77891c161d@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>     <2a35d2f1-88f0-4013-a021-6f94604ffcff@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com> Lines: 58 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.211.165.120 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1204072491 19510 127.0.0.1 (27 Feb 2008 00:34:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:34:51 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.211.165.120; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4406 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:642058

On Feb 26, 11:02 pm, james.de...@googlemail.com wrote: > On Feb 26, 7:26 pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 6:46 pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:46:25 -0800 (PST), Nuxx Bar > > >  said in > > > : > > > > >I've said repeatedly that I will do it, to humour you trolls, but that > > > >you know what they are anyway, and that you're lying when you say > > > >otherwise. You can say "You haven't done it yet" as much as you want, > > > >it just makes you look impatient. > > > > Um, no, it makes us look puzzled, because despite your repeated and > > > increasingly hysterical assertions we can't identify the supposed > > > measures of which you speak, despite most of us being motorists > > > ourselves. > > > LIAR. "can't identify" is a LIE. You *know* the sorts of things that > > I'm referring to, because the likes of the ABD and many others have > > repeatedly identified them, ... > > Are you now going to admit that you know perfectly well which sorts of > > measures motorist advocates in general believe to be anti-motorist? > > Ah, that sounds like a breakthrough. So the list you keep threatening > to post consists not of "anti-motorist measures" but "measures > considered anti-motorist by motorist advocates".

It consists of both, actually. Although I would expect most here to insinuate that anything that a motorist advocate said couldn't possibly be correct. Because most here give the mysterious and coincidental impression of being motorist-haters, even though I'm assured that they're nothing of the kind.

> I think you probably > need to establish more of a track record of sounding less "out there" > than spindrift at his most didactic before many will consider it worth > spending much time trying to second guess what is going on in your > head. Anyway, don't rush on my account. I am in no special hurry to > see your list.

I'll bear that in mind. You patronising burk. And I can assure you that whatever this newsgroup might drive me to post, I have no mental problems whatsoever. Spindrift can make no such assurance, and it's pretty obvious that he's always like he is on here (whereas I adopt a "troll-fighting" persona because I'm damned if I'm going to let their poisonous and deliberately upsetting remarks get to the "real" me).

> Hope you manage to calm down a bit. You sound pretty stressed

Trolls do stress me out. It's why I try to limit my exposure to them, and it's why I won't be around here much longer. That's why they're so terribly obnoxious to anyone who's against cameras of course: they know that the quicker they can make someone leave, the less they'll be able to post annoying true facts.