Nuxx:28e762a9-446f-4816-9673-6402feccfa8e@a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <28e762a9-446f-4816-9673-6402feccfa8e@a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:29:01 -0800 (PST) References: <4_ydnZpOJKf8keXQnZ2dnUVZ8jKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <3fd9f5fc-ab1e-4b80-8141-f8ca23c707d8@u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <1b69b10d-4e22-4938-8067-da805b1a0fb7@p12g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>   <081ed37e-0c8e-4f5a-9f7c-765b824b09fc@w6g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> Lines: 50 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299968941 9517 127.0.0.1 (12 Mar 2011 22:29:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3523 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38844

On Mar 10, 4:43=A0pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > On Mar 10, 3:15=A0pm, Ian Jackson  > wrote: > > > > If Nuxx Bar gives permission we could post publicly the email > > notifying Nuxx Bar of the reasons for the ban. > > Oh, knock yourself out. =A0This would presumably be the completely > useless two-line email from Simon Brooke?

Fuck it, I've waited long enough. Here is the email in question. Of course it Earth-shatteringly reveals my guilt beyond any question.

> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:53:43 +0100 > Subject: Re: Why Have I Been Blocklisted? > From: urcmmoderators@googlemail.com > To: nuxx.bar@live.co.uk > CC: urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk > > Dear NuxxBar > > You were banned because we are sufficiently convinced that you are the > person responsible for the campaign of forgery and abuse which occurred a > few weeks ago. > > Yours sincerely > > Simon Brooke > > for an on behalf of uk.rec.cycling.moderated moderators.

As there was presumably some vote on the matter, and there have been significant changes in the "moderation" team since, the least the "moderators" could do if they want to feign any kind of fairness is to have another vote now. I'm not holding my breath. Jackson wanted me banned from the start and it was just a matter of finding a faintly plausible excuse.

BTW I'm taking bets on who's going to be the next "moderator" (Jackson needs to get some supporters on board pronto in order to replace those who have recently left):

Kleiv Jawj: 3-1 (you hang on in there Clivey, it won't be long now...) Alistair Gunn: 4-1 Simon Mason: 5-1 Chapman: 10-1 (Jackson would never have considered him before due to so many holding him responsible for URC's destruction, but Chapman is one of Jackson's few remaining out-and-out supporters, he has all the "right" car-hating/helmet-hating opinions, and desperate times...oh, but Chapman "hasn't got time"...until he's asked of course...)