Nuxx:729c06db-abf1-491e-8eeb-b0d7ddb72632@t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <729c06db-abf1-491e-8eeb-b0d7ddb72632@t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Omphaloskepsis Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 02:12:47 -0800 (PST) References:  Lines: 24 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1296987167 3596 127.0.0.1 (6 Feb 2011 10:12:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 10:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2566 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:36914

On Feb 6, 8:08=A0am, The Wanderer  wrote: > So here we are, the same people still trying to get the last word in, and > it all counts for 4/5th's of Sweet FA. It's really quite enlightening at > times just sitting back and watching these entirely pointless arguments > drift on and on and on and on......

Have you noticed that it seems to have started at the same time as URCM and its almost universally condemned "moderation" decisions? As long as there's a fundamental and serious problem with URCM, people will (and should) state examples here, and of course doing that makes it likely that the "moderators" and their two supporters will attempt to bullshit their way out of it, but that's not a good enough reason to stop logging the ridiculous rejections here.

I can understand why you would want UNNM back the way it was though, so I hope your vote can be counted upon when an effective RFD/CFV is produced. In the meantime, if you don't enjoy the comedy entertainment, you can (and probably do) ignore the relevant postings.

BTW, I don't really believe that I engage in arguments per se to a particularly large degree, but YMMV, and you may well not have meant me in the first place. Besides, just because two people are arguing, it doesn't mean that one isn't entirely correct. And someone else here said that usenet was about arguing...to an extent, he had a point.