Nuxx:OzN8l.222322$LM6.210972@newsfe03.ams2

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe03.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Another get off the road letter. Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:38:34 +0000 References:  <20090106112054.0175d0b9@bluemoon>  Lines: 23 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To:  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.21.204.127 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe03.ams2 1231267156 82.21.204.127 (Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:39:16 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:39:16 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2087 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:682374

Tom Anderson wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Rob Morley wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:18:02 -0000 >> "Simon Mason"  wrote: >> >>> Ban cyclists to free up the road for vehicles. >>> Letters: >>> >>> http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/zhdmjan09.htm >> >> "The Mail says: If cyclists follow the rules of the road, nobody can >> expect to ban them from the roads.  What do you think?" Cue various >> toadie parp parp rants. > > Are they also implicitly saying that if motorists don't follow the rules > of the road, everybody can expect them to ban them from the roads? If > so, i look forward to seeing the might of the Hull Daily Mail thrown > behind my national demotorisation crusade. > Nice to see that you're so open about your antimotorist stance. I assume you have no problem then with those who want to remove cyclists from the roads?