Nuxx:8e1d2b6d-87d1-4c35-867d-a3da14644559@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <8e1d2b6d-87d1-4c35-867d-a3da14644559@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Who decided that all motorists were criminals? Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:16:12 -0700 (PDT) References: <5d93d769-e12d-47f2-b7cd-a55d8d0619c5@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <05f744tp8r3u6g9dv11fjfk34ndsl14osj@4ax.com> Lines: 56 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.217.66 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212412573 27280 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2008 13:16:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 13:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.217.66; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008051206 Firefox/3.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4536 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:651650

On Jun 2, 10:28=A0am, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:13:49 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar >  said in > <5d93d769-e12d-47f2-b7cd-a55d8d061...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>: > > >Yet another person who has this crazy idea, for which there is no > >evidence whatsoever (except in pretty much every large town and city > >centre), that motorists are being systematically persecuted by the > >authorities. > > It's spelt "prosecuted". =A0It's funny how you rail against > decriminalised parking enforcement, and rail again against > enforcement of the criminal law against motorists. =A0No, not funny, > actually, since it's obvious that you are a loon who thinks that the > law should not be enforced where it conflicts with the personal > convenience of one, and only one, class of road user. =A0The class > that, interestingly, happens to bring most of the danger to the > roads. =A0And then you wonder why people here think you are a troll. > Can I interest you in this box of critical faculties? =A0Or perhaps a > slice or two of self-criticism?

Yep. No-one's allowed to criticise any aspect of the law or its enforcement, because they're perfect in every way. Except when cyclists are fined for jumping red lights in Oxford, then the trolls whinge. They want to see what they regard as sensible, proportionate enforcement for cyclists, but they want to see motorists punished as much as possible. Whereas I just want sensible, proportionate, safety- led enforcement for all modes of transport. Why do the trolls discriminate against motorists? Why don't they want proportionate enforcement for them? Because they don't like them, due to being nasty, spiteful little twats. And they have the nerve to make allegations about others singling out one class of road user for special treatment, when it's actually only them that do that. I want things to be fair for everyone; the trolls want things to be fair for cyclists, but not for drivers. Utter dicks. They'd hate it if automated, conveyer-belt, discretionless enforcement started to be used against cyclists, and they know it. "But cyclists aren't as dangerous as mobile death greenhouses!" moans Crapman. But hang on Crapman, the law is the law, remember? Oh sorry, I forgot, you only use that line against motorists. Those motorists that you love so very much.

These "The law is perfect at all times and thou shalt not criticise" fuckwits always amuse me. According to them, when a law is changed, it's perfect both before and after the change. How can that be? Of course, the fuckwits don't worry about little things like that, because all logic is consumed in a flurry of self-righteous wankerdom.

Crapman applauds parking enforcement which is conducted to raise revenue rather than keep traffic moving, and he wonders why so many people make the "mistake" of thinking he hates motorists. What a tit. Still, it's funny to be able to keep outwitting him and exposing his anti-motorist agenda so effortlessly. He obviously doesn't like it very much. I almost feel sorry for him, as much as you ever feel sorry for a lying, cowardly socialist fuckwit who campaigns to kill road users. MURDERER.