Nuxx:Ff3efca9-b28f-4b15-b099-26d386a6832f@k38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:28:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <7830mlF1j66rlU1@mid.individual.net>  <78462fF1jakr7U1@mid.individual.net> <002r15pn1cdqafq6p0p17a8qlc6d89hv2u@4ax.com> Lines: 85 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243456102 28671 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2009 20:28:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k38g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 5473 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:704727

On May 27, 8:25=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > Yes, absolutely. =A0Sadly, that is pretty much all they do. =A0That and > endlessly repeat complete nonsense in the hope of provoking a reaction > (which is a standard definition of trolling).

It's only complete nonsense *in your opinion* (and in the case of the contention that speed cameras have killed thousands, you don't even disbelieve that, you just pretend to as part of your murderous anti- car agenda).

> > Take nuxx for example: he promised to leave if the group was used for > its "proper" purpose, but it rapidly became clear that as far as he is > concerned "inappropriate" material includes any kind of advocacy of > cycling as a mode, any comment at all from the people whose views (or > rather a strawman caricature of them) he hates, any comment chiding > him for anything at all, especially posting rabid car-supremacist > propaganda - in short he thinks we can only be free of his trolling if > we behave as uk.rec.jeremy-clarkson.fanwank.

Why do you post things which you quite clearly don't even believe yourself? I want you and Spindrift, and the thinly-disguised car- hating nonsense that you spout and encourage others to spout, gone. Promoting cycling is fine; advocating anti-motorist measures while
 * pretending* to promote cycling is most definitely not.

> He's been TOSd by usenet providers

NOT TRUE - LIAR

> and apparently also by his ISP,

NOT TRUE - LIAR

> As I say, I'm not a fan,

As always, you are lying. You *do* want a "moderated" group, where "moderated" =3D automatically ejecting all posters who make a habit of disagreeing with you. And *you* want to be a moderator. Do you Lou Knee?
 * ever* tell the truth about anything? Oh, and have you ever posted as

> If I could use a completely text-based interface to a moderated web forum > as good as urc can be then I would use it.

Yeah, except that all the web forums tend to ban you on sight, don't they? And even if you managed to sneak onto one, you soon would be banned from any properly moderated forum because you simply can't resist attacking your opponents. This thread alone is littered with examples. I, on the other hand, am capable of not attacking people when I decide not to, and that's why I've never been banned from Cycle Chat. But you simply *can't help it*: the urge to sneer at and insult your opponents is far too strong for you to resist, even when you know perfectly well that bad things will happen to you as a direct and immediate consequence.

Still, I suppose that when you're so blase about advocating measures which you know to be killing tens of thousands of road users, the odd personal attack doesn't even register (unless someone attacks you, when you whinge and cry about it as if you're suddenly the most sensitive and well-behaved person in the world).

> In the end urc has always > been here mainly to share, and these folks want us to stop doing that, > either because they don't like what we share or because they are > jealous of the fellow-feeling we often demonstrate.

You hate cars. You lie about it and pretend that you're advocating cycling instead. You're so hellbent on making things harder for motorists that you even advocate anti-motorist measures which you know are responsible for thousands and thousands of deaths. I will therefore do anything I can to disrupt you and your sycophants, and I'm doing road users everywhere a favour by doing so.

I'm not sorry, I don't regret it and I'll keep doing it in any way I can until you stop being such a fucking malicious bastard, and find something to do which is less spiteful and doesn't involve upsetting tens of millions of motorists just for the sheer hell of it, no matter how many people die, get injured, lose their careers, etc because of it. Lay off the motorists and stop murdering road users, you absolute fuck, and I'll be only too pleased to have nothing whatsoever to do with you ever again. Cunt.