Nuxx:MPG.2788b4a9fddb909998983f@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-out1.kabelfoon.nl!newsfeed.kabelfoon.nl!xindi.nntp.kabelfoon.nl!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Wm... Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 03:49:38 -0000 Lines: 39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 4d03d340.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=ni1HEcSQEoe1PHEoBToc[dYjZGX^207Pk`<MJMoM3PFmMJ<13^FZIfjBH4535cfTO`3H_g=G0FR[bY8FNVX\43Dc X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 3050 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:35667

Wm..., I would be obliged if you answered the following questions. Many thanks in advance.

1. You have previously stated that you asked Chapman whether he posted as Lou Knee, and (shock horror) he gave you a proper answer. What was that answer please? Or did he swear you to secrecy?

Doesn't the whole Lou Knee debacle show how dishonest, evasive and deceitful Chapman is when the facts are against him? That he never admits he's wrong no matter how bang to rights he is? Is there any point in trying to have a genuine, factual debate with someone who won't admit when they're beaten? Do you think his attitude in this regard goes a long way towards explaining why he gets so many people's backs up to such an extent in so many disparate places?

2. You are constantly accusing JMS of having an "owner", and all that sort of nonsense. Why do you not give "N Ron Hubbard" at least an equally hard time, considering that "it" is blatantly a sock of a regular poster? "N Ron Hubbard" only ever posts to criticise JMS or me, and has gone to the trouble of purchasing an anonymous account in order to hide their identity. What do you think of that? If "N Ron Hubbard"'s criticisms are valid then why does the person concerned not just post them under their usual name?

Do you think it's someone like Chapman or Wacko, who both claim to have killfiled JMS and me because they're so superior? Or is it just someone who ultimately realises that the criticism they post under "N Ron Hubbard" is incorrect and indefensible, but is unable to face that fact (you know, the kind of mentality which led to URCM's formation and the censorship of awkward truths which is routinely practised there)?

3. Why do you have "..." after your name? I think you should consider ditching it. Recently Simon Brooke replied to you and ended the sentence with "Wm..."; I wasn't sure whether the "..." was only there because it was part of your name, or whether Mr Brooke had meant to put "..." at the end himself but thought it was excessive to put "Wm......".

Do you see what problems the "..." after your name causes? Is it really necessary to have it?