Nuxx:MPG.27a3edba9d68b5cc989889@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: On manual again - moderators continue to ignore the charter and victimise a pov they don't like Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:24:18 -0000 References:   <8psteoFemaU1@mid.individual.net>    Lines: 39 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: e23b9afb.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=T0:KR>WiKVA;dNhMZVkA7FYjZGX^207PK`, nuxx@bar.invalid says... > > In article , > philip.saunders@ntlworld.com says... > > > > Nuxx Bar wrote: > > > In article <8psteoFemaU1@mid.individual.net>, broadband1234[remove] > > > @ntlworld.com says... > > >> > > >> Sadly, Phil can often be his own worst enemy. > > >> He's had six more posts rejected already....{!o!} > > > > > > Of course, you know how to play the system, by (for example) telling a > > > gay guy to repost in another newsgroup specifically so that you can > > > abuse him for being gay, by your own admission. > > > > > > "Christians" like you are just lovely, and really do a lot for the > > > reputation of Christianity and religion in general. You seem to be a > > > lot more about hate than love. Still, I think you're part of a dying > > > breed, which is obviously good. > > > > I never did any such think - I won't call you a liar because I think you > > have genuinely made an error. > > Actually I think you have. > > > Jeff did what you claim. > > That's why I was replying to his post and not to yours. Agreed? Do you > see that he was the one I quoted rather than you? (I've left it in > above.) > > > I look forward to your apology which will show that you are not a liar :-) > > No apology necessary IMO :-)

PS - No-one else had better point out what I just have, otherwise Chapman will tell you off for "defending Nuxx".