Nuxx:885baf5a-10fe-4326-a366-1d349e027a10@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <885baf5a-10fe-4326-a366-1d349e027a10@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:57:35 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <784aj1F1j3r9uU1@mid.individual.net>    Lines: 30 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243461455 18079 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2009 21:57:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2995 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:704747

On May 27, 9:53=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > Whether to stamp on endless reiteration of factually > incorrect nonsense on which correction has already been posted

But you would say that the above equals an exchange like this:

Nuxx Bar: "Speed cameras have cost thousands of lives." Crapman: "No they haven't, that's nonsense, fuck off troll."

The first statement is not objectively "factually incorrect nonsense" (in fact you even agree with it yourself, you just pretend not to because that suits your anti-motorist agenda), and the second statement is not a correction. So there is no reason why the first statement should not be reposted. However you, and others such as Jackson, would still ban people for making the first statement after it had been "corrected", so it's quite clear that you shouldn't be moderators. You simply cannot resist pretending to be objective (by saying something's "factually incorrect") when actually it's nothing more than your subjective, twisted, car-hating-agenda-led judgment.

And that arrogance of yours is one of the many reasons why you are so despised. When you disagree with someone about something, you don't even acknowledge that there's any real debate, you just behave as though your POV is factually correct, theirs is factually incorrect, and everyone knows it. This is bad enough when you genuinely believe the POV which you assert, but when you don't even believe it yourself (as with your "cameras don't cost lives" assertion), it's even worse. You're scum, and the main cause of all the problems in this group.