Nuxx:108b3026-ba03-4c92-8554-3c30557a3309@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <108b3026-ba03-4c92-8554-3c30557a3309@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:31:31 -0700 (PDT) References:       <87my7oi9wi.fsf@toy.config> Lines: 17 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.153.43.239 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1246473091 2447 127.0.0.1 (1 Jul 2009 18:31:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 18:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.153.43.239; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2434 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:6363 uk.net.news.config:54956

On Jul 1, 6:35=A0pm, Daniel Barlow  wrote: > Tom Crispin  writes: > > Do you think for one minute that each and every member of urc agree > > with your entire choice of pannel? =A0No. =A0Probably not one person do= es, > > I don't see anyone there who I really don't want. =A0And since their only > role qua moderator is to accept my posts or not - they're not > representing my opinons or passing laws that affect me

They *will* be representing your opinions. If they agree with what you're saying, particularly regarding controversial subjects, they're a lot more likely to pass your posts than if they disagree. I don't expect you to have a problem with that considering that you *do* agree with the "moderators" on the "key subjects" (not that that's a coincidence, since they've been hand-picked to ensure that they think the right things).