Nuxx:14b436fb-f11d-4ad4-9558-c111495a72ea@k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <14b436fb-f11d-4ad4-9558-c111495a72ea@k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: MattB, JNugent Et Al: In What Way Are They "Trolls"? Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:54:48 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 42 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.206.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222379688 15617 127.0.0.1 (25 Sep 2008 21:54:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.206.99; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3687 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669162

Can any of the pro-camera posters name a single anti-camera poster who they haven't automatically dismissed as a "troll"?

Can anyone explain what the likes of MattB and JNugent have done to deserve the "troll" label? (By the way, "Disagreeing with me", "Exposing my anti-motorist stance" and "Annoying me with the truth" aren't valid answers.)

If you can't do either of the above things (as the facts are, annoyingly, *yet again* against you...funny how that keeps happening), or you don't like me coming on here and posting true facts about cameras, road safety, anti-motorist policies or lying anti-motorist trolls, just confirm it by posting "Don't feed the troll" or something similarly original, witty and clever. After all, the utterly banal, useless, predictable and worthless comments posted by the likes of you can only make my posts appear even more incisive, perceptive and articulate than they actually are. So knock yourself out (preferably literally), and show what a brainless little turd you really are. Come on "_" and friends, what are you waiting for?

(By the way, since so many of you seem to get so *incredibly* narked by people daring to descend into your anti-motorist cesspit and posting true things, I've got some advice for you: why don't you jump ship and assume a stance which is actually based on truth, logic and reason? After all, the truth could hardly irritate you then, could it?  As ever, you know I'm right really.  Surely if something is clearly annoying you so much, it's best to take steps to deal with it conclusively.  Posting "Oh I'm so big, look at me and my killfile", "You're a troll" and "La la la not listening" are only temporary fixes, as some other git will always come along and remind you of the truth again, but stopping this silly anti-motorist nonsense and assuming a stance based on science and facts will sort the problem out permanently, and then you'll never need to try to hide the truth from yourself again. Wouldn't that be better all round? Aren't you weary of posting "Black is white" and then covering your eyes and posting tired abuse anytime someone points out that actually white is white? Is it really worth the hassle and the irritation? If you're not going to stop defending cameras for the sake of motorists, or for the sake of the thousands of road users who are being killed by cameras, do it for the sake of your own sanity, before you lose it completely (although obviously it's too late in the case of the likes of Spindrift, which is very sad).)