Nuxx:Cc342742-4f95-4618-8b23-1a99257e31a9@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Don't feed Troll Nuxx Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Lines: 41 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.206.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222393026 24620 127.0.0.1 (26 Sep 2008 01:37:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.206.99; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3346 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669183

On Jun 12, 3:28 pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:07:25 +0100, Mark McNeill >  said in > : > > >But on the other hand, you *do* let this twit control your actions. He > >knows now that if - for whatever pathological reason - he needs to get > >somebody to notice him, you'll always be obediently there with a > >response. > > Not really, I just enjoy pointing and laughing at the idiot. > > Tell you what, though, see how you like it when people accuse you in > public of being a murderer. Even when they are obviously deranged, > it is still not exactly pleasant.

Don't campaign to kill road users then. You're the one who chose to start doing it. Find another way to give motorists a hard time which doesn't involve killing people (or preferably stop giving motorists a hard time altogether), and the hurtful accusations will go away.

I accept that you don't support cameras *because* they kill people. But you do support them in the full knowledge that they kill people, because you're so impressed with the way that cameras make things hard for motorists that even the thousands of deaths caused by the devices aren't enough to stop you from advocating them. Why can't you see how callous that is? It's time to give yourself a clearer conscience and stop supporting cameras. So you're disappointed that such a "good" anti-motorist tool can't be used. But can't you accept it and advocate something different instead? Why not start being completely transparent about your agenda against motorists, instead of hiding it behind bogus road "safety"? If being anti-motorist is so worthy and necessary, you shouldn't feel the need to do that.

All you have to do is bite the bullet, admit that you've been supporting cameras solely because they make things difficult for motorists, and stop doing so. You started it, and now here's your chance to end it. Do you really think I'd bother coming anywhere near you or this shithole if I didn't have such a fundamental problem with your campaigning and the reasons for it? I wouldn't, so just as soon as you start being honest, I'll be dust.