Nuxx:88debdb1-3252-4e6b-b827-a29e43f15c64@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <88debdb1-3252-4e6b-b827-a29e43f15c64@v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: urc's resident "troll feeder" Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:11:57 -0800 (PST) References:     <9tr3o4pj30fmke4ssco5jv5ski017o8iv6@4ax.com>  <0ab4o4lf7tj1ea0mnbro22bsehjo4svfvl@4ax.com> Lines: 52 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.151.152.80 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1233299518 6684 127.0.0.1 (30 Jan 2009 07:11:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.151.152.80; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4226 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:684273

On Jan 29, 10:38=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > The problem is that I am too slow in > diagnosing the stubborn trolling idiots from the clueless newbies.

You called me a "troll" in your first post to me. So either you were lying about thinking that, or you're lying above.

The real reason why you were so determined to argue with me at every opportunity for so long is that you knew I was right about cameras, and you hated that I was exposing the truth about them, in the same way that you hated that Paul Smith was doing so.

> >Pretty much, it works for me. This is Usenet, you'll never change > >anyone's mind. What you need to realize is that in hundreds of posts, > >all you've achieved is the continued occupation of this group by a > >number of single issue mental cases with no purpose but to disrupt.

Ha ha. "Mental cases". So anyone who fights fire with fire and adopts an abrasive style when (and only when) posting in a group full of lying motorist-hating freaks (or, if you like, "single issue mental cases") is a "mental case" now? Whatever. Is a soldier "violent" just because he uses weapons when and where he needs to? No, but he recognises that unfortunately, it's sometimes necessary.

I personally think that those who prefer bullying motorists to saving lives are pretty fucked up, but there we go.

> The thread with Dragon in it had numerous participants. =A0The last > two threads based on nuxxious emissions have zero input from me. =A0I > have not replied to a single post from judith in over a month, > others have fed that particular troll. =A0I think you are being overly > harsh in blaming me for all this. =A0I don't deny responsibility, but > I do deny /sole/ responsibility.

Crapman, I was perfectly happily ignoring you until you popped up on one of my threads very recently and accused me of trolling in it, despite *everyone* else managing to take it at face value and reply civilly and usefully. You may not be replying directly, but you're still reading my posts and replying indirectly (and replying directly as "A little bird"), and you still can't resist stirring it and trying to censor discussions about speed enforcement for fear that the truth may be arrived at.

I'll cut you a deal. You don't mention me, you don't accuse me of trolling, you don't participate in my threads in any way, shape or form (either as yourself or "A little bird"). You don't try to stop people discussing things which *you* personally don't want them to discuss because you don't want logical conclusions to be reached. If you can manage that (and of course you won't be able to), I'll gladly go back to pretending that you don't exist.