Nuxx:J1g7jg$9uc$2@dont-email.me

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Ding Dong  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: uk.rec.cycling moderated Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:54:24 +0100 References:   <871ux2acvc.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> <1eung8x376.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <87vcue8uzn.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> <3v7og8xuh9.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <874o1y8nib.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk>     Lines: 14 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Reply-To: ding@dong.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8psORfuBq3je/hVXnlNHEQ"; logging-data="10188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/gqbfrIe913rAgRxrrQ6zoI8XUn1jkqJQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To:  Cancel-Lock: sha1:ekrEn73ylwQDeLWyijCvAu0kxYM= Bytes: 2362 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:41352

On 05/08/2011 01:43, Jon Ribbens wrote: > On 2011-08-04, Percy Picacity  wrote: >> Oh sorry, see what he means. In fact, as you say, there are very >> few such points and no reason to believe many would fail to respond >> to complaints. So everyone agrees cancelling them is not a major >> objective, not sure why I'm discussing it really! > > Because my original point was, that since the theoretical possibility > exists, the urcm moderators are in principle justified in cancelling > any Approved message that is [cross-]posted to their group that was > not approved by them. If they did that to a message that was posted > and approved by Control then Exciting Consequences Would Ensue.

Bring it on. Ian Jackson is certainly arrogant enough to do that.