Nuxx:254c70d0-8f41-4ca1-8d27-13deffe5b7f6@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <254c70d0-8f41-4ca1-8d27-13deffe5b7f6@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Earn_=A350_In_Under_A_Minute?= Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:56:30 -0700 (PDT) References: <4b69965c-8145-4096-b9bf-b5c23090c233@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>  <3fab181f-694e-4f64-9497-467ee2d0658a@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <30971cda-1dc6-4837-8df7-9e04db788faa@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> Lines: 38 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.206.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222368991 13878 127.0.0.1 (25 Sep 2008 18:56:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:56:31 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.206.99; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3357 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669127

On Sep 25, 12:23=A0am, dkahn400  wrote: > On 24 Sep, 23:58, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > By the way, this is a time-limited offer. =A0It'll end sometime in the > > next week. > > Don't worry, Nuxxy. No one seriously thought you had any intention of > honouring your word.

Oh, so you're an advocate of people being honest now, are you? In which case, why have you lied so many times about not being anti- motorist? (Or would you have finally admitted it if you'd actually thought I was going to "honour my word"? Is that what you meant by the above?)

Perhaps you don't realise just how ridiculously obvious it is that you actually are anti-motorist. If you did, you surely wouldn't get on your high horse about "honesty". Who knows, maybe you'd even TELL THE FUCKING TRUTH. Though how you can not think it's obvious, when you support so many anti-motorist measures, is anyone's guess. You must think people are really thick if you genuinely believe that they can't see through your pathetic lies. But the only thickies are you and the other trolls.

Actually though, I'm wondering whether the trolls on here are only denying being anti-motorist to wind me up. "Oh look, it's someone who hasn't got it in for motorists. Can't have that.  Let's all hilariously say we're not anti-motorist, despite it being screamingly obvious that we are.  That ought to piss him off." Which, to be fair, it has. But there's nothing particularly clever or funny about it, it just indicates that you know that you can't defend your anti-motorist stance.

Still, David Damerell has broken ranks and admitted to being anti- motorist (Crapman won't be happy about that), so let's see if he can now defend his stance. (Somehow, I can't see the "I'm not anti- motorist" types telling him that he's wrong to be anti-motorist. Funny that. Almost as if they secretly think the same as him.)