Nuxx:C6c68b3d-afd7-4ebe-9466-f655f24e88cd@u26g2000hsd.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u26g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: The troll-wrestlers have won Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:49:08 -0700 (PDT) References:  Lines: 15 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.146.155 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222930148 14168 127.0.0.1 (2 Oct 2008 06:49:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u26g2000hsd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.146.155; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008091620 Firefox/3.0.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2076 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669975

On Sep 11, 1:34 pm, Tony Raven  wrote: > Well I popped back in to urc after a break and found a raging troll-fest > with people I thought knew better earnestly wrestling away at the trolls > ad nauseum in the apparent belief the troll was there to be persuaded. > The signal to noise ratio is so low that the group is not worth > bothering with. The troll wrestlers have won it for the trolls and so > I'm off. Enjoy your new-found sport.

"Trolls" = "anti-camera posters". Or can you name an anti-camera poster who you don't consider a troll? Exactly, you can't. In other words, you're flouncing off because you don't like debate on cameras' effectiveness being allowed. Pathetic, and it's people like you who give urc its bad reputation, so it's better off without you. Poster by poster, (actual) troll by troll, urc WILL improve, whether you and your ilk like it or not.