Nuxx:4e2ef128$0$2500$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <4e2ef128$0$2500$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Who Wants Me to Stop Posting? Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:53:56 +0100 References: <5dkVp.13480$Z04.6239@newsfe07.ams2> <4e25dcf7$0$2949$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk> <4WoVp.13545$Z04.11512@newsfe07.ams2> <4e267f46$0$2949$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk>  <610h27dm8h17f46qi86hsb2gal0hlrvre8@4ax.com> <2NiWp.24713$Z04.10437@newsfe07.ams2> <35823fd6-063c-4cd2-a556-1307f7d6db6d@z7g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>    <482b99d7-b872-4ad4-830f-422751921fb9@h14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <4e2aac34$0$2489$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk> <2939294e-8a3e-4717-8a3d-89a53bccf4a0@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> Lines: 43 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2939294e-8a3e-4717-8a3d-89a53bccf4a0@e21g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: d25c6ad3.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=lSmICLiM]6?MkMMdX^n^O<0g@SS;SF6n7RiiCXJE[K>7I[IU=`hSLf?`:ITG5aA:c7mUZ=Cf`T22= X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 3568 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:818854

On 23/07/2011 14:12, Squashme wrote: > On Jul 23, 12:10 pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: >> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote: >> >>> On Jul 23, 8:54 am, Bertie Wooster  wrote: >>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR >> >>>>  wrote: >>>>>> He can't, he bottled. >> >>>>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from >>>>> some weird American university? >> >>>> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it? >> >>> Medway admits he was not there. >>> FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront. >>> End of, I'd have thought. >> >> I find this whole argument rather tedious, but you must know that that's >> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time. > > Despite the time details on the image?

The simple fact is that I haven't looked into this issue at all, and that's because I *don't care*. And unlike people such as Chapman (who sided against TMH simply because he disagrees with him in general), I am not going to believe one person over the other just because I "prefer" their opinions in general.

That's just the kind of attitude which damages URC: people refusing to objectively look at the facts in order to genuinely make up their minds, and instead just believing whatever they *want* to believe.

I really, honestly don't care what happened here, and I can't be bothered to spend the time trying to find out, when presumably there is no conclusive evidence anyway. So I'm just saying that, rather than doing what a psycholist would do and pretending I've investigated thoroughly and I believe TMH, just because I usually agree with him.

That's really all I have to say on the subject. But if other people want to discuss it then, not being a censoring psycholist, I'm certainly not trying to stop them.