Nuxx:F887a72d-4a96-435d-b879-8fc9c27f5b18@s11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!s11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:58:08 -0700 (PDT) References:  <1683556780321528474.078862%steve%-malloc.co.uk@news.individual.net> <9C$JWYfXPkgNFwoD@[127.0.0.1]>   <3aq6o6hq020ter1ke3io47qt6i3sopet3n@4ax.com> <9ICdnZOJPYS_8x7QnZ2dnUVZ8jSdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>  <50xo7XKtY3gNFw7Y@[127.0.0.1]> <8uiafcFcerU1@mid.individual.net>  <8ujuo6Fa89U1@mid.individual.net>  <8ukd7vFn01U1@mid.individual.net>    <1jyfn0i.p0u2bpxnb402N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300636689 29865 127.0.0.1 (20 Mar 2011 15:58:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3301 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:41686 uk.rec.cycling:844356

On Mar 20, 2:39=A0pm, %ste...@malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > Peter Keller  wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:24:48 +0000, Judith wrote: > > > > Come on Porky =A0- don't be shy - point out the "apparent" admission = - > > > otherwise people may think it is yet another one of your little pigle= ts > > > on the loose. > > > Hags vary in color > > Who do you think you make look bad with this pointless, repetetive in > style if not exact content, posting? Here's a clue, it's not Judith.

It's strange because Peter is otherwise not unreasonable. I tried asking him about the "hagfish" thing recently on URC, but just got "I'll post what I want and I'm not going to explain it to you". Well, fair enough, he can indeed post what he wants, but presumably he wants to make a point with the "hagfish" posts, yet he doesn't want to reveal what that point is. The point, presumably, is "Judith shouldn't attack Chapman", since that seems to be the trigger, but quite why (for example) Chapman seems to be at liberty to attack Judith is not clear.

Oh well, if that's what floats his boat then I suppose it's harmless enough. It certainly doesn't seem to bother Judith (who, as noted in this thread, usually gives as good as she gets, but seems to have long since taken to ignoring the "hagfish" posts).