Nuxx:1336b120-3731-4dd0-93f4-ca6f898648b1@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <1336b120-3731-4dd0-93f4-ca6f898648b1@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Guess Who? Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 07:19:43 -0700 (PDT) References:      Lines: 32 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300285183 13896 127.0.0.1 (16 Mar 2011 14:19:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2721 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:802617

On Mar 16, 8:20=A0am, Peter Keller  wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:03:53 -0700, Nuxx Bar wrote: > > On Mar 13, 10:20=A0pm, Peter Keller  wrote: > >> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 19:05:44 +0000, Judith wrote: > > >> > Porky Chapman? > > >> > or failing that Anchor Lee. > > >> Hagfish > > > I predicted that one as soon as I saw Judith's post! =A0It seems that > > "Porky Chapman" is the trigger. =A0I don't quite know why Chapman doesn= 't > > get the same treatment when he makes digs at Judith though.... > > If there is a point you want to make you make it. =A0Just don't expect me > to make your points in my posts.

I don't, I'm just trying to work out exactly what point *you're* trying to make with the "hagfish" business. Every time Judith has a go at Chapman, she gets a paragraph about hagfish slime/eggs/ grossness, yet she is apparently allowed to have a go at others with impunity, and no-one else ever gets the "hagfish" stuff at all. So it would appear that you object specifically to Judith having a go at Chapman, and I was just wondering why this was, as you must have seen that Chapman also makes unprovoked remarks about Judith, so it's not like Chapman is the innocent victim that he likes to portray himself as.

(I've also vaguely wondered where you get all the hagfish information, but I can't be bothered to Google for it....)