Nuxx:J1g7ed$9uc$1@dont-email.me

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Ding Dong  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation,uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal Subject: Re: uk.rec.cycling moderated Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:51:40 +0100 References: 		 <20110804211558.11929395@bluemoon>   Lines: 58 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Reply-To: ding@dong.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8psORfuBq3je/hVXnlNHEQ"; logging-data="10188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Y8VmdQ/F7GpvGK1jtA+Qx4Ghs/v0ztF0=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To:  Cancel-Lock: sha1:FoOXes8+Yer8h16GFk+H/Yp0e3g= Bytes: 3950 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:41744 uk.rec.cycling:848489

On 04/08/2011 21:52, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: > On 04/08/2011 21:33, Mike Lovell wrote: >>> So forgers are less likely to be caught out next time - yeah >>> right. > >> Unless of course your findings are not correct, which we'll never >> know if you don't share them. > >> And you could be fooling for some kind of "false flag" postings that >> the forger carried out to incriminate another person. > >> Nobody outside of their Usenet provider knows for sure (or almost >> for sure) who posted this. Or in the case of a hacked Usenet >> account, the originating IP address - Then we're down another level >> to the ISP. > >> I'm not sure why you're so worried about posting what you've found, >> it's all speculation anyhow. > >> If someone doesn't already know how to forge a post, or post >> anonymously, Google will very quickly remedy that - It's no secret, >> it's public knowledge. > > It's a fair bet that it comes from this netblock: > > inetnum:     62.255.240.152 - 62.255.240.159 > netname:     READING-BC-LIBRARY > descr:       Reading Borough Council (Library Project) > country:     GB > admin-c:      AW129-RIPE > tech-c:      NNMC1-RIPE > status:      ASSIGNED PA > mnt-by:       AS5089-MNT

How in any way is it a "fair bet"? Where is the evidence for the above? You've just pulled it out of your arse and you want everyone to believe it! Unfortunately, with your track record, no-one of any importance is likely to.

In any case, you live a couple of miles from there, and you were "working" from home yesterday, weren't you? You sad bastard, posting your *own* information to try to incriminate someone you don't like. This whole thing really is a low blow even for you. Let's hope that someone does do something unpleasant with the information as it would serve you jolly well right.

Oh, and which public library even lets you run a news client (still less a Mac one)? Oh dear oh dear, it's all falling apart, isn't it? And what do you do when you start losing the debate? You start being deceitful and refusing to answer questions. It's absolutely inevitable.

> There's no certainty at this point but as I say I know that he received > an unwelcome communication from Zen in response to complaints; I will > share details with a trusted third party for verification in confidence.

aka "I've got nothing but I want everyone to think I've got something, so I'm implying something that isn't actually the case because that kind of deceit is my bread and butter".