Nuxx:J1gf15$gf2$3@dont-email.me

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Ding Dong  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: More driver wriggling Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 11:01:09 +0100 References: <7c811ade-136f-4ff9-aa31-19ea91014cfb@z14g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>    Lines: 18 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Reply-To: ding@dong.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 10:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8psORfuBq3je/hVXnlNHEQ"; logging-data="16866"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18AITOW1VWeixyuj+lcekcJ/6yQ+nuW6kk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To:  Cancel-Lock: sha1:SFUMx7MwS/Ihv5M3REjaWD9XQTE= Bytes: 2043 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:848506

On 05/08/2011 09:55, Simon Mason wrote: > > "Phil W Lee"  wrote in message >> >> It's possible alright, but rarely actually done. >> Still, he got 4 points, which means he can do this twice more in any >> three year period before being banned (and then only for 6 months). >> The system seems to be aimed at ensuring that very little can be done >> to impede the ability of shit drivers to cause maximum mayhem. >> >> Now if they changed it to 1 point = one month ban, and retained the >> totting up rules but for a permanent ban, that would be reasonable. > > Indeed. > The mobile phone law was widely flouted until 3 points a pop was > introduced, which tends to concentrate the mind somewhat.

Which is why all drivers still "speed".