Nuxx:3a5b273f-3c4f-4396-9dc6-26bfe8c56671@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3a5b273f-3c4f-4396-9dc6-26bfe8c56671@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:50:04 -0700 (PDT) References:   <0tk925tu9futl1k2kcmedg94sdg2iuhlbi@4ax.com>  <874ouz2fho.fsf@toy.config>    <$JkJrbuO4YJKFwct@[127.0.0.1]>  Lines: 23 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244015404 30039 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2009 07:50:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 07:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2680 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:52657 uk.rec.cycling:4590

On Jun 2, 11:10=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Jun 2, 9:39=A0pm, "Wm..."  wrote: > > > I'd suggest the initial mod policy should allow everyone a clean sheet. > > A mod policy based on "we won't allow this person or that person to pos= t > > before we start" is likely to raise unnc hackles. > > Absolutely.

Actually, I'm sure you would have loved it if I/Judith/etc had started off without "clean sheets" (or preferably banned altogether), but I suppose you remembered that your past behaviour was unacceptable as well, and wouldn't it be embarrassing not to be let into the "moderated" group that you'd been clamouring for?

> It will, if nothign else, be interesting to see how long > they can stick to civil on-topic discussion without trolling > signatures :o)

Oh look, an inflammatory comment. You literally cannot post anything to do with one of your many opponents without making one, can you?