Nuxx:Z1Xfl.690$3d2.28@newsfe30.ams2

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe30.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Spindrift: "Vile Car-Hating Fanatic" (Not Said By Me) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:08:31 +0000 References: <30f5b32b-8ca4-4f1e-b146-08d44e210a28@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> 	<770a72c3-4ea5-4498-8bf3-1acdb05d240a@s1g2000prg.googlegroups.com> 	 <10d5715f-10fc-4832-a0ee-a0833c50de91@m16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> Lines: 34 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10d5715f-10fc-4832-a0ee-a0833c50de91@m16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.21.204.127 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe30.ams2 1233140985 82.21.204.127 (Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:09:45 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:09:45 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2883 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:684161

Nuxx Bar wrote: > On Jan 27, 3:16 pm, _  wrote: >> On the offchance that these are geniune questions and not simply a rant, > > There is never anything remotely genuine about anything that Spindrift > posts. > >> I'd ask similar questions about this very newsgroup. I will start though >> by saying that I do agree with you that wishing someone cancer is more >> than a bit OTT (with the notable exception of Duhg, who whines on about >> animal testing of drugs and how he feels that people should just suffer >> with what they've got). But back on point, what you seem to have >> suffered there is the result of entrenched positions. Whoever you had >> issue with was adamant in his point, and unwilling to concede there even >> WAS an alternative view. Does that sound familiar yet? >> >> Despite what some here believe, I'm not nuxx and I have plenty of easily >> verifiable history of online presence. I'm reasonably educated and an >> experienced professional in my business, so while I might well be >> contentious, I'm certainly not a dribbling moron. > > Err...I'm educated and professional as well actually.

Sorry, I wasn't clear enough there - I was not trying to insinuate you weren't.

> And my posting > style here is not employed elsewhere, it's just that when I'm talking > to a bunch of crazed, lying motorist-haters, I find it pointless > trying to be remotely tactful or subtle. > rants, by all means think he's a halfwit, but at the same time wonder what on Earth has made him so furious. No smoke, and all that.
 * Thats* what I *was* attempting to insinuate - if someone screams and