Nuxx:9ee1b58a-d92a-4a7f-8d45-6ad6cc68d6b8@k7g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k7g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <9ee1b58a-d92a-4a7f-8d45-6ad6cc68d6b8@k7g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Double 'meta' reject Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:57:14 -0700 (PDT) References:  <20110318222044.7ca13dd5@bluemoon>  <20110318235901.3af4e3e1@bluemoon> <9315d335-8c9d-47b4-895c-2d6b3397265e@c26g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 14 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300546634 7654 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2011 14:57:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k7g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 1937 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:39059

On Mar 19, 12:03=A0pm, Trollsworth LeTrole  wrote: > > I can agree to disagree on that point.

That's really good of you. It's very generous to allow someone to disagree with you in this particular case. I know you're not usually so tolerant.

> So I'm confused as to why it's taken until now for people to claim to > be all surprised and outraged.

Yes, of course, if it's someone you disagree with then they aren't being sincere.