Nuxx:B410b38d-ae44-4763-91c7-3a257f3a6a3e@i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:25:50 -0700 (PDT) References:    <8umhd7F66bU1@mid.individual.net> <1jyfocg.yi9et41r4x4fzN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>  <1jyfy1p.pjduwfjuszguN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>  <3ab181a1-8698-4b0f-af04-ad95abf39626@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 23 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300659950 18470 127.0.0.1 (20 Mar 2011 22:25:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2562 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:39130

On Mar 20, 9:25=A0pm, Mark Goodge  wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar put finger to keyboard > and typed: > > >On Mar 20, 8:06 pm, Mark Goodge  > >wrote: > > >> An > > >Wow, the UKRC moderation queue hasn't been addressed since yesterday, > >and it only contains people who you seem to dislike...I hope this > >isn't the start of a transition to a Christian URCM.... ;-) > > There are four people on the moderation team, and I last checked the queu= e > this morning. Of the people currently flagged for manual moderation, none > of them are there because I put them on that status. So I think your > complaint is a little unjustified.

It was only intended as a light-hearted remark...if it had been a proper complaint then I would have started a new thread. Still, thanks for putting my posts through.