Nuxx:J1h1s9$fej$1@dont-email.me

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Ding Dong  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation,uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal Subject: Re: uk.rec.cycling moderated Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:22:48 +0100 References:    <3nT_p.96956$T85.1549@newsfe19.ams2> Lines: 57 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Reply-To: ding@dong.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8psORfuBq3je/hVXnlNHEQ"; logging-data="15827"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0u/lN6vpO1By6cQ8NluY6ec82LxuQfwc=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To: <3nT_p.96956$T85.1549@newsfe19.ams2> Cancel-Lock: sha1:x6+CTnP7DV3Ua7yaUaAO+RIJ2vY= Bytes: 3792 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:820617

On 05/08/2011 15:46, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: > On 05/08/2011 09:27, Mr. Benn wrote: >> "Paul Cummins"  wrote in message >> news:memo.20110805091414.1788E@postmaster.local.domain... >>> In article , ding@dong.invalid (Ding >>> Dong) wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, and which public library even lets you run a news client >>>> (still less a Mac one)? >>> >>> Any public library that offers Wi-Fi access. >>> >>> You have to be a member of Reading Library to use their desktop >>> computers, but anyone can ask for the WiFi key and get it... > >> Are you saying that the posting came from Reading library? > > It is most likely to have come form

Ah yes, your dysfunctional left hand. Thanks for reminding me.

> a library in the Reading Libraries allocated netblock.

Until you tell us how the hell you think you know that, no-one is going to take it even remotely seriously, and rightly so. There is zero public evidence that it came from Reading Library, and unfortunately you've lied and deceived about a million times too often (haven't you, Lou?) for people to simply take what you say on trust. And your deceit reaches a peak when you're dealing with your archenemies (or people who you think are your archenemies).

> The real world does not move at the speed of rumour > so it will take time to establish that beyond doubt.

I bet whoever it was is shaking in fear. This isn't the first time that you've made threatening noises about this sort of thing which have come to absolutely nothing, is it?

> As I said, I have further and more substantial evidence that is not for > public discussion.

And as others have said, that is utter bollocks and you're just scaremongering. You're far from a nice or considerate person, and so you would just tell everyone if you had anything worthwhile.

> I am happy to share that in confidence with a neutral > and trusted third party, someone like The Todal or Pedt from whom I have > had email previously. They will be able to judge whether this is a game > or not.

Oh, how exciting. And then what will happen publicly? Absolutely nothing, by any chance, assuming you even have these conveniently "confidential" discussions in the first place?

I'll try to remember to mention this post in a month or so, when nothing's happened, just to remind people that yet again you've been dishonest about something.