Nuxx:J1h29b$i46$1@dont-email.me

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Ding Dong  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: uk.rec.cycling moderated Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 16:29:46 +0100 References: <7hqc37th81jndlcli480pvnlslt3ia9a85@4ax.com>   <1k5ez2j.9ns31d1kvtvvuN%alan@darkroom.+.com>       <7IHSUOdOb+OOFw1v@[127.0.0.1]>   Lines: 40 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Reply-To: ding@dong.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8psORfuBq3je/hVXnlNHEQ"; logging-data="18566"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+pEReP18B3PijLPQmxv6euiByXxKvviI=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To:  Cancel-Lock: sha1:Srno/WZZ95tBlQsxwcq/8/Iz9Lw= Bytes: 3171 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:41409

On 05/08/2011 15:33, Wm... wrote: > Fri, 5 Aug 2011 15:10:22  > uk.net.news.moderation Judith  > > Wm: >>> The obverse of that is, of course, why are *you* trying to post to a >>> group that does not want to hear what you have to say? >> >> You mean that the moderators of the group do not want other people to >> hear what >> I have to say. > > Pretty much, you don't add anything.

Just because the "moderators" don't want to hear Judith's opinions, that's not a valid reason for them to ban her. There is nothing wrong with the posts she made, and if anyone else had made them then they wouldn't have been banned.

Judith was banned because of who she was, what she thought and what she had posted to URC, and one of the main reasons Ian Jackson created URCM was to keep her and her opinions out. Are you denying that? Is anyone?

>> PS I post their regularly using a variety of names; they really have >> no idea. > > That is OK then, use the nice side of your schizophrenia for urcm and > your nasty personality for other stuff.

That's not very nice, or true. Judith is always nice to people who are nice to her; if she was schizophrenic then she would be "up and down" towards them as well.

Those who Judith has a go at have *always* done something to her, and deserve what they get in return. She's very good at putting people in their place cleverly and humorously.

> Not really complicated is it?

But to be fair, you are (and you probably think that's a compliment).