Nuxx:J1gkqt$mfi$1@dont-email.me

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Ding Dong  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.legal Subject: Re: All My Details Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:40:08 +0100 References:      Lines: 67 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Reply-To: ding@dong.invalid Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8psORfuBq3je/hVXnlNHEQ"; logging-data="23026"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18w31eYmIB97c5harMuagJKC523L99EOTo=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 In-Reply-To:  Cancel-Lock: sha1:N5976gi8k8HubghYRYoYNYIpwkU= Bytes: 3707 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:820564

On 04/08/2011 23:22, Judith wrote: > > I really thought that I was in a minority in despising Porky as much as I do. I > can honestly say that I have never disliked/despised anyone - in real life, or > on usenet - as much as I do him.

Same here.

> However, I can clearly see that I am not alone. Here are some sample comments > from other people from the linked pages:

Thanks for compiling those. Some of them are very familiar-seeming, aren't they? In fact, most of them are. Clearly we're not the only ones who think them by a long way.

These resonated particularly:

> It's his usual lies. But he often gets away with it.

He does seem to get away with "murder" in Wikipedia, and we know how much he lies.

> JzG responded, with the most dense, POV-pushing personal attack I've seen in a > long time from him. I'm not sure he's actually lying, because he may believe > what he thinks.

Could so easily have been written here.

> He depends on people to not check anything out, or to only look very > superficially.

ABSOLUTELY. He deceives in that way again and again and again. Lou Knee anyone? Or indeed his accusations on this thread?

> His belief in himself rises above all possible density, it is what makes pigs > fly.

Another reason to call him "Porky"....

> JzG's a cunt, I suggest you tell him so on his talk page and stop whining here.

He certainly doesn't like people editing his talk page.... ;-)

> JzG also still refuses to admit that he was wrong

YES. Always.

> Has he ever admitted anything

NO. Never.

> Guy isn't ever one to admit he may have been wrong

And again. He's the same everywhere it seems.

> JzG defrucked himself in November. What were the circumstances for this borish, > inane, off-target goofball to be allowed to slink out the back door quietly > instead of being held accountable for his years of loose canonry? Some pitiful > personal drama that everyone is supposed to tolerate?

And yet now he's back as an admin and is *still* allowed to spread his lies and hate, despite being such an arrogant dick and getting so many people's backs up. The only consolation is that one day, he'll go so far that even Wikipedia's "Arbitration Committee" won't be able to just slap him on the wrist like they always have until now. Eventually he'll be desysopped for good, and that will be a wonderful day for reason and honesty on the Internet.