Nuxx:Ccb62857-8ac6-47a0-8bc4-10d6712e5de2@t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:28:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <3rov45dq3mn0rd03bb4ld757vce94jv7r6@4ax.com> <2i3a551nb9n9c5o23vep3uh22g349a4ena@4ax.com>  <08ib559ja9bb7kubrunhobd7c2to0uddns@4ax.com>   <762dnT_nmOFCucvXnZ2dnUVZ8i1i4p2d@bt.com> Lines: 37 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247164099 28592 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2009 18:28:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3202 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:55818 uk.rec.cycling:6964

On Jul 9, 6:11=A0pm, Marc  wrote: > jms wrote: > > On 09 Jul 2009 12:38:42 +0100 (BST), Ian Jackson > >  wrote: > > >> In article <08ib559ja9bb7kubrunhobd7c2to0ud...@4ax.com>, > >> jms =A0 wrote: > >>> (Sorry - do you want me to email my questions to you - as you seem > >>> intent on not responding to the serious points I raise here. > >> I'm generally not responding to your `important points' because no-one > >> is interested in what you have to say, because it's generally endless > >> repetition of lies, disinformation and personal attacks. > > > So - =A0*you* have decided that I have never have anything interesting > > to say - because you know that *no-one* is interested. > > > Fascinating. > > Let's check! Speak up anyone* who thinks that the judith thing has > anything useful so say!

Assuming that by "the judith thing" you mean Judith, I think she has plenty of useful things to say; she tells it like it is more than virtually anyone else in the godforsaken pit that is You Arsey.

> *By anyone I mean somone who can be recogised as not a sock puppet of a > troll.

Ah. The usual caveat so beloved of the You Arsey regulars. "Does anyone disagree with me on this subject? (By 'anyone', I mean anyone who's not a troll.  By 'troll', I mean anyone who disagrees with me.)"  In other words, the question is "Does anyone who doesn't disagree with me disagree with me on this subject?"

As ever, it's a case of trying to force matters by cheating, because the unaltered truth isn't what you want it to be. So predictable. So pathetic. So You Arsey.