Nuxx:15ab5548-8d23-4184-b3f0-3f410369dcdc@v31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!v31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <15ab5548-8d23-4184-b3f0-3f410369dcdc@v31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT) References: <8ujuo6Fa89U1@mid.individual.net>  <8ukd7vFn01U1@mid.individual.net>    <8umhd7F66bU1@mid.individual.net>  <8uvi14FtvsU1@mid.individual.net>  <9brmo6tlnp8rbm192iq6jlfl3bl7tdska7@4ax.com>    <2eKLBtCVZflNFwxS@[127.0.0.1]> <2a21580c-41af-4e08-ace2-92ba0a767c07@k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <20110402082329.2990c821@gododdin.internal.journeyman.cc> <0miLPjq1YtlNFwzm@[127.0.0.1]> Lines: 28 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301766289 26851 127.0.0.1 (2 Apr 2011 17:44:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v31g2000vbs.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3254 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:39904

On Apr 2, 8:54=A0am, "Wm..."  wrote: > > I've no idea what Nuxx is on about most of the time.

I've never known such hypocrisy!! My god, you really are something. Shall we ask everyone whose posts they find more comprehensible out of yours and mine? You seem to get off on talking in riddles and being cryptic. Your patronising manner, as though you're some shrink doling out indispensable advice (but advice which really has to be "thought about"), is very irritating, especially when you're talking down to people who very obviously know a hell of a lot more about the world than you do or ever will.

> Hating car-drivers I > can sort of understand but hating cars?

Well I used to call Chapman et al "motorist-haters" but "car-haters" is less of a mouthful. Basically Chapman thinks all motoring is antisocial and unacceptable except when he and other important people do it. He doesn't like the thought of the riffraff being able to go where they want, when they want, in comfort and speed, and without being controlled or monitored by the state. He thinks that bullying people out of their cars is imperative and is worth pretty much any cost in terms of money or lives.

So that's what I mean by "car-hater", not that there's any point in trying to explain this or anything else to you, because it's impossible to get through to you.