Nuxx:MPG.270204a32691b6e9989806@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news2.euro.net!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Any Worse Moderated Newsgroups than URCM? Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:54:52 +0100 Lines: 13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: c6e5a854.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=T^MmIDg=PQh6l^Oa0Ah_PgYjZGX^207Pk`I89b X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 1527 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:33684

Just out of interest, can anyone here think of any other moderated newsgroup in the history of usenet (uk.* or otherwise) where moderation decisions have been continually and extensively criticised *anywhere near* as much as with URCM?

I'd be surprised if there were any such examples. If there are not, it just reiterates how arrogant and stubborn Jackson and co are that they continue to behave as if there is little if anything wrong with the current situation. "He disagrees with me, therefore I'm going to disregard his views" seems to be the way that Jackson in particular approaches everything, and people's views on URCM are no exception.

URCM is a farce.