Nuxx:150e0890-757e-458f-95c7-b0daa48408f1@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <150e0890-757e-458f-95c7-b0daa48408f1@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Chapman: One Of Many Ridiculous Statements Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:37:28 -0700 (PDT) References: <2f4b8afb-2fce-4038-b8f3-d90276025c78@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>  <67561f11-383d-44db-af25-eb67224eca42@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 17 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217428648 14976 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2008 14:37:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2173 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:659722

On Jul 30, 1:08=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:57:46 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar >  said in > <67561f11-383d-44db-af25-eb67224ec...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>: > > >> agenda-driven > >What agenda, and where is your evidence? > > LOL! =A0"Paul Smith, the man with no agenda" - no, not terribly > plausible, that one.

Reading Paul's web pages and his posts, it's entirely obvious that he was a decent man who genuinely cared about saving lives, and that was his agenda. Reading your posts, and bearing in mind the fact that you support every anti-motorist measure, it's equally obvious that your agenda is not saving lives, but a hatred of motorists. Why do you insist on denying it when it couldn't be any clearer?