Nuxx:Ae8ba067-61e8-49de-801f-3f875f243c76@s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Cycling on pavements Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:40:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <4a1a4037$1_1@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com> <413ad67a-174c-4a5d-b954-dcd8c1078636@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <4a1a5155$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  Lines: 37 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243269619 6783 127.0.0.1 (25 May 2009 16:40:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:40:19 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2803 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:829458

On May 25, 9:10=A0am, spindrift  wrote: > On May 25, 9:05=A0am, Bod  wrote: > > > spindrift wrote: > > > On May 25, 7:52 am, Bod  wrote: > > >> Being a cyclist myself,I'm amazed at the number of people who > > >> deliberately ride on the footpath,even though there is a cycle lane. > > >> They expect pedestrians to move out of their way as well,they seem > > >> to make the rules up as they go along,they are totally out of order. > > > >> Bod > > > > Which cycle lane do you mean Bod? > > > The road type. > > > Bod > > You mean it's not segregated? > > Where is this cycle lane please, we can't be expected to evaluate the > efficacy or otherwise of a lane you refuse to describe... > > There are circumstances where the pavement can be safer than cycle > lanes that force cyclists to yield at junctions, share with children > on bikes and old ladies with shopping bags and telephone boxes and bus > stops etc etc. > > Which cycle lane are you referring to specifically Bod? > > Or are you unable to say because you're trolling?

Pot, kettle, black. I knew the "trolling" accusations would come sooner or later: just because Bod has posted opinions which oppose those of the "regulars", he's branded a "troll", despite having done nothing to deserve it. ABSOLUTELY TYPICAL OF URC. No wonder URC is the laughing stock that it is.