Nuxx:F0e6fc05-fb01-4e92-b97f-9e8a38579c96@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Speeding Fines Up By 400 Per Cent Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:59:35 -0700 (PDT) References: <979ff286-12ac-4e1d-9516-b18ca0133114@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>     Lines: 26 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.129.172 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218027575 26287 127.0.0.1 (6 Aug 2008 12:59:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.129.172; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2845 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:661172

On Aug 6, 12:49=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 12:04:57 +0100, "Brian Robertson" >  said in : > > >And if you want to see someone who sums up their low intellect in a shor= t > >space, your quote at the end of your posts is a great contender. > > The text in question being: "You can either promote cycling or > promote helmets, the two are incompatible." Those are my words, not > judith's, and I stand by them. =A0Every helmet promotion campaign I > have ever seen emphasises the dangers of cycling in order to > increase the desirability of the supposed solution. Why would you > need special protective clothing if the thing you are doing is as > safe as walking? =A0The only thing is, it turns out that cycling *is* > as safe as walking, and denial of this fundamental fact is a core > principle of Liddites everywhere.

Judith's been quite clever here in exposing the trolls' modus operandi, which is to attack the poster rather than what they are saying. Therefore, Judith gets attacked for saying those words, whereas Chapman never gets attacked for saying the very same words. The sum total of what the trolls spout is the result of their spiteful little vendettas: vendettas against motorists, vendettas against people like Judith and me, vendettas against Safe Speed, etc. Truly pathetic, but that's what we've come to expect from the trolls.