Nuxx:MPG.256044ce4ad65fdf98969a@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: The Reverend Tom Crispinson  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Has Guy Chapman Ever Posted as Lou Knee? Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 03:01:03 -0000 Lines: 29 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.13 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091107-1, 07/11/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 191c2440.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=FXAKg[DGi02nfn@OA0Q;890g@SS;SF6n7R9OH0:RnEN42Bnd^9j0A0;`:ITG5aA:c7j1P@CkJf>S6 X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 2758 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:741288

Has Guy Chapman ever posted as Lou Knee? Why will he not answer the question when he's been asked it by several different people (surely if he hadn't posted as Lou Knee, he would have just said "No" by now)? And why won't any of his fans answer the question "Why will he not answer the question?"? I think it's obvious to *everyone* that he *has* posted as Lou Knee, and I think we all know which post he made.

And so we turn to the question of why he made the Lou Knee post where he called another poster a "piece of shit". Why did he not just post as himself? Was he trying to make it seem like there was more support for his position than there actually was? I can't see any other logical reason for him pretending to be someone else when he made that post, although it is Chapman we're talking about, so logic may very well not come into it at all. (After all, it's not logical to hate motorists.)

It's time for him to stop evading the question. He seems to think he can please his "God" without having to be honest by simply refusing to say whether he posted as Lou Knee. Well, somehow, if "God" existed then I don't think he'd be as easily deceived: "He" would know that Chapman was still taking the soft option by not fessing up, and that whether or not he actually lied about it was more or less irrelevant, and he'd probably be more angry with Chapman for taking "Him" for a gullible fool (like Chapman does with *everyone*) than he would have been had Chapman just lied and denied making the post. So Chapman fails. Again. As always.

Let's see if he's learnt anything yet, shall we? Guy Chapman, here's your chance to redeem yourself: Did you make the Lou Knee post where you called another poster a "piece of shit"? You *must* answer.