Nuxx:2b320423-c813-4c3a-a56b-4ad98bef9b2d@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <2b320423-c813-4c3a-a56b-4ad98bef9b2d@x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:11:10 -0700 (PDT) References:  Lines: 25 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245705071 22843 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2009 21:11:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2352 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:53543

On Jun 22, 8:45=A0pm, Ian Jackson  wrote: > > There are even credible allegations of real-world > harassment such as abusive late night phone calls.

Still not good enough. "Credible" how? Because the person who made the allegations is anti-motorist like you? Would such an allegation by JNugent (who couldn't *possibly* be called a "troll") have even made it into the RFD? No, because he doesn't toe the anti-motorist line.

You are just showing exactly why you're not suitable to moderate anything: your blatant bias towards those who you agree with, no matter what the evidence for what they're saying, is totally unacceptable. If you can't even stop being biased for the RFD then what hope is there that you'll be unbiased when censoring (sorry, "moderating")?

Even without the "credible", that nonsense has no place in the RFD. If you want to show (albeit belatedly) that you're genuinely even- handed then GET RID OF IT.

In the meantime I object to Ian Jackson and Alan Braggins being moderators, and I strongly object to Peter Clinch.