Nuxx:06bcd0d4-ab5f-4d36-a1c6-ea4a7e7d41b9@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <06bcd0d4-ab5f-4d36-a1c6-ea4a7e7d41b9@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: IAM Cycle Safety presentations Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:10:27 -0700 (PDT) References:  <6b638343-909d-4978-85e0-e96061884d3c@l12g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <0fadneKsg9Fn4KrXnZ2dnUVZ8ghi4p2d@brightview.co.uk> <59c3bc25-ac23-4b25-8271-b00453b4d943@r10g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>    <8dfdbb1d-7037-481a-a297-654483122f9f@r16g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 76 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245348628 13175 127.0.0.1 (18 Jun 2009 18:10:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 5172 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:710573

On Jun 18, 8:25=A0am, Nobby Anderson  wrote: > Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > On Jun 17, 8:46=A0am, Nobby Anderson  wrote: > >> Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > >> > Are you convinced that I'm wrong about Chapman hating motorists? > > >> Yes. > > > Well, only you know whether you're lying or not, but if you are, ask > > yourself why. > > OK, so you ask for a definitive answer, I give one, and because it's > not the answer your delusions inisist it should be you don't believe > it.

As with cameras killing people, the evidence is there in copious amounts, and if you choose to disregard it, that's not my problem.

> Oddly enough, Nuxxy, there are people out here that think you're > mad.

Mainly fuckwit car-haters and other nutters. If anything I *want* people like that to think I'm mad, thanks. My view of life radically differs from theirs, and I have no problem with that.

> I'm no psychiatrist, but surely even you have to admit that > your obsession with Chapman isn't normal? =A0Paranoid? =A0Delusional? > Well, to a layman, both those terms seem to fit. =A0Normal? =A0Nope.

He is one of the most obvious, and despised, people on this group. I dislike him with a passion. I enjoy winding him up, exposing his lies and exposing the fact that he so desperately wants to hide: that he hates motorists. In addition, he constantly posts stupid things about and in reply to me which just beg for a reaction. Therefore, when I'm on URC, I mention him a fair bit.

When I'm not on URC, I couldn't give a stuff about him. Don't be fooled by the ridiculous phone call allegations: not me guv, it's someone else who hates him (if indeed the calls took place at all). I've got many better things to do than worry about idiots like him most of the time, I can assure you. Don't believe me? IDGAS. I actually live pretty near him and his address is publicly available, so if I wanted to, I could stalk him, put shit through his door, and all sorts. Such behaviour hadn't even crossed my mind until just now.

> I don't know the guy, but I'd hesitate a guess that you're just not that > important to him. =A0I'm pretty sure that he's secure enough in his own > views and opinions, misguided as they occasionally are, that you'd have > a great deal of trouble embarassing him. =A0Particularly given the level > of spittle-flecking in your posts here.

He changed it because, and straight after, I drew attention to it. I can't, any more than you can be bothered to look for it or ask him (but if you did ask him, and he had a rare truth-telling episode, he'd admit that that was the case).
 * promise* you. If I could be bothered I'd dig out the evidence, but I

And it's "embarrassing". HTH.

> I do wish you'd hurry up and start that legal action against him, it's > going to be ummm, how can I put it, quite interesting. =A0But then you an= d > I both know you're not actually going to do it, are you?

You're making too many assumptions. Why don't you just wait and see what happens?

> You'll just > continue to shout and scream and foam at the mouth like the powerless > ineffectual little child you are.

Heh. If I'm a "child", just because you think you've discovered I'm younger than you, I guess that makes you a grumpy old man. ;-)

BTW, what's Nobby short for? The mind boggles....