Nuxx:28e9024f-7a31-4d7c-9cac-72a1428434eb@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <28e9024f-7a31-4d7c-9cac-72a1428434eb@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: The wind and the rain Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:43:53 -0700 (PDT) References:   Lines: 24 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.255.206 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222875834 6289 127.0.0.1 (1 Oct 2008 15:43:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.255.206; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008091620 Firefox/3.0.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2561 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669863

On Sep 30, 4:49=A0pm, Roger Thorpe  wrote: > hello nuxx, do you think that ab...@dsl.pipex.net would be interested in > your nasty posting habits?

Hello Roger. Do you think that the fuckwit "_"'s ISP would be interested in *his* nasty posting habits? Do you think it's reasonable for person A to systematically attempt to ruin *every* thread that person B starts, just because he'd rather not be reminded of the true facts that person B insists on posting? Usenet is for discussion, yet he is trying to smother discussions which involve the "wrong" facts being propagated. Furthermore, if I am slandering him, then he is slandering me with this "troll" business. Either his behaviour, and mine, are acceptable on usenet, or neither are (and I think it's the former). But what is indisputable is that he started it, and before he started with his pathetic attempts at censoring the truth, I tended to ignore him for the boring, lying, scheming little shit that he was (and still is).

Make him stop being a tit, and I'll go back to ignoring him (once he's been taught a lesson). But threatening to complain about me but not him, just because you purport to disagree with the opinions that I post, is a bit much, don't you think? You know he's as much of a stirrer as I am, and you know he started it.