Nuxx:3cf27316-a120-41c7-a4c8-8a0918589d9a@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3cf27316-a120-41c7-a4c8-8a0918589d9a@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Chapman: His Agenda Exposed Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:37:53 -0700 (PDT) References: <0f3fd3c5-7db2-47aa-bbd5-bbbae629d329@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6fg1d3FbcseoU1@mid.individual.net> <6d4f5ee2-de07-4b3b-a8e8-bfce6ca4bc97@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com> <3763c73e-c184-4a34-abbe-0f62b0290d90@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> Lines: 73 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217590674 29861 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 11:37:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4788 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:660116

On Aug 1, 11:13=A0am, spindrift  wrote: > nuxxie, you're a fruitcake

Hypocritical statement number 1.

>, you were a fruitcake on Cycle Chat when > you posted as bobbylightcycles before getting banned

Hypocritical statement number 2. I have never been banned from Cycle Chat. In fact, the only place I have been banned from is Cycling+, who were well known for censoring the opposition (among many, many other things). You and Crapman, on the other hand, have been banned from more transport-related forums than anyone else. Why do you think that might be?

> and you're a > fruitcake here,

Hypocritical statement number 3.

> I even highlighted a story about a motorcyclist > injured by a wire, there's no hatred of any other road users here,

Lie number 1.

> just from me at least an opposition to PTWs sharing bus lanes because, > despite their being fewer PTWs than cars they are twice as likely to > injure cyclists.

As I said in my reply to you in the relevant thread, making prejudiced statements about motorcyclists in general does not change the fact that everyone is safer when motorcycles are allowed into bus lanes. Face it Spindrift, even if motorcycles caused no accidents, you still wouldn't want them in bus lanes, because you want to "discourage" powered private transport usage and "encourage" cycling. You even admitted as much yourself.

> You've also made some bizarre claims about me causing a building to be > evacuated for summat or other, I've no idea what you're blathering on > about and you refused to explain - that's why you're ignored by most > people here.

Really? Because I said that one (true) thing? Where's your evidence? More people here know you're a dangerous nutter than you obviously think, and on non-anti-motorist transport forums, you are almost universally despised. You're *the* person that people immediately think of as the foremost example of an unhinged, motorist- hating, agenda-driven tosser, comfortably outstripping Chapman (although he takes the silver medal by quite some distance).

And when you say "explain", what you mean is that you want me to name names, which I'm not going to do, because you know them already and no- one else needs to (and besides, it's not my place to tell them). You found out the address of the workplace run by one of your long- standing online adversaries, and you made one or more creepy offline threats which left that particular person with no option but to get everyone out of there, permanently. In doing so you crossed the line (probably not for the first time) between being a pathetic, libellous, cowardly keyboard warrior and being a serious criminal.

> Take a breath, go for a bike ride, get laid, get a life.

LOL! I'm extremely confident that I get laid more than you (which after all wouldn't be difficult, since the only woman you ever shag is Cathy Browne), and have more of a life (you see, I actually work and socialise offline, and I don't spend my existence running between Internet cafes, coming in my pants at the thought of spouting more anti-motorist bollocks). As for taking a breath and going for a bike ride, I'd say we're both pretty equal on both of those (all the time and none of the time respectively). So I make that hypocritical statement number 4.

Three little words: you, hate, motorists.