Nuxx:Dd6aea93-234c-4fe6-9286-ccf9b3bdb143@x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,cam.transport Subject: Re: Helmets reduce bicycle-related head and facial injuries Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT) References:  <3e8v06d9uld16hrat811hu5m8tcuu42nss@4ax.com>  <0c4ff8a8-88c6-4241-bc8b-3697fe9dec2e@h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <87c608FsggU1@mid.individual.net> <6783e051-2db4-4d43-8116-245526b98cf1@i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <1sedncPnbJ14m4zRnZ2dnUVZ8mOdnZ2d@pipex.net>   <51ff6f16-2fce-42c7-b779-f0fa9d282971@h13g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>  <8e08450d-b995-4411-8ed0-14e9a9e1a113@g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>    Lines: 18 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1277240081 21495 127.0.0.1 (22 Jun 2010 20:54:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 GTB7.0 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729) GTBA,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3030 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:770720

On Jun 15, 12:27=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Jun 15, 8:43=A0am, Toom Tabard  wrote: > > > I've made it clear why I don't in general discuss individual papers on > > this group. A look at egwww.cyclehelmets.orgwouldmake it clear why. > > Yes, we completely understand. =A0You won't cite your evidence because > well-informed people will knock giant holes in it, as has happened > with some of the higher-profile studies on cyclehelmets.org.

But you're only against helmets because you have an agenda to 1) minimise restrictions on cyclists (no matter how sensible) and 2) maximise restrictions on motorists (no matter how ridiculous) because you want to force everyone out of their cars, and you don't give a monkey's arse about anyone's safety. You don't care if people DIE as long as you get your way. So you're basically a self-serving shit who no-one should listen to in debates like this, aren't you?