Nuxx:A2d24a40-0933-40d1-ab96-53f64401939a@k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: delete newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated - IMPORTANT STRAW POLL Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:56:54 -0700 (PDT) References:  <7487aed2-86a3-44a6-963b-82f0ef1e4eca@w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com>     <7jy6dkqr4s.fsf@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk> <5e7f36tcl2jsnonebck4q9809gdfj8od0n@4ax.com> <38df36pcnm9np6eel06i67rcl99km9ssgv@4ax.com>  Lines: 19 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1278723414 14144 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2010 00:56:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 GTB7.1 GTBA,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2534 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:61471

On Jul 10, 1:07=A0am, Se=F1or Chris  wrote: > Geoff Berrow wrote: > > > This group needs to do things differently to regain any sense of > > credibility. > > You're the one who has admitted that your attitude to the group is > prejudiced by a personal feud with one of the moderators.

Strange, I must have missed that. Where did it happen?

> You're the one whose credibility is in tatters.

Well I'm glad you're so happy with the blatant bias shown in the current "moderation" of URCM, but then the bias is towards your point of view (not that that's remotely an excuse for supporting it). Unfortunately not everyone regards discrimination, dishonesty and misuse of powers from uk.* moderators as an ideal situation, and that's not going to go away however much you want it to.