Nuxx:4e28132b$0$2942$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <4e28132b$0$2942$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Proof of Cyclist Fuckwittery Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:53:15 +0100 References:   Lines: 43 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To:  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 04c921fd.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=\c6A\C`LbQ1gi@@h3C?Zj7YjZGX^207P;` On 20 jul, 16:19, Judith  wrote: >> The Gruppenführer Ian Jackson has made a post in his personal group : URCM: >> >> -- >> I would like a bike computer with a clock that doesn't drift >> annoyingly. Currently I have a Cateye Velo 5 and it loses about a >> minute a month. >> -- >> >> FFS - that is awful - losing about 2 seconds every day; how can you live like >> that? >> >> How the fuck can you calculate your speed correct to 3 decimal places if you >> are using shite like that. >> >> (I've responded in the thread: I hope he doesn't spot me :-) >> >> Confirmation that he is barking if ever it was needed. >> >> --     >> >> "wearing helmets can sometimes increase the chance of a cyclist being >> involved in an accident." >> >> That august body The CTC >> >> (They've already had a slap for lying by the ASA) > > I am not certain that I am acquainted with the rather base terminology > that you maintain but feel obliged to point out that some of your own > actions might well fall into the category with which you have titled > this thread. > > I allude to your categorical statement of having evidence which proves > that the three contributors are the same person and your consequent > failure to produce that evidence when challenged to do so. > > Such evidence has not yet crossed the threshold of existence and your > claim to possess it was mendacious.

Why do I get the feeling that you're a sock which has been specifically created to (pompously) wind up Judith?