Nuxx:763f0403-dc17-4eeb-9dc2-81280877833c@a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <763f0403-dc17-4eeb-9dc2-81280877833c@a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: "The Sign Knows Better Than The Driver"...But Which Sign? Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 00:15:34 -0700 (PDT) References:     Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.170.121 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1220512534 4314 127.0.0.1 (4 Sep 2008 07:15:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.170.121; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2926 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:666293

On Aug 28, 7:46=A0pm, judith  wrote: > I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy Chapman) > Some evidence shows that helmeted cyclists are more likely to hit > their heads. (Guy Chapman) > I have never said that I encourage my children to wear helmets. (Guy > Chapman - proven to be an outright lie)

Tee hee. Crapman's always lying, ducking, weaving and using all sorts of other dishonest and underhand tactics to cover up his various hidden agendas and general stupidity, but that's one of the most blatant and clear examples yet. The whole thing wouldn't be as amusing if he didn't continually make out, in the most pompous way possible, that he was some kind of intellectual authority on road safety.

Although actually, it's not amusing at all. It's nauseating and disgusting that he pretends to care about road safety so much, when all the time he's actually campaigning to kill MORE road users rather than fewer. And all so that normal motorists can be forced off the roads by his precioussss speed cameras.

I wonder what he would do if a driver killed his wife because the driver was looking at his speedo instead of the road, to make sure he was within the limit due to a camera that he was coming up to. He would no doubt carry on exactly as before, with some feeble excuse about how the camera was nothing to do with the incident. *Nothing* must get in the way of the anti-motorist crusade, and *no* amount of death and destruction caused by cameras is enough to change that. Extraordinary.