Nuxx:474e898e-b100-4e9e-8d28-ca18c0380bb3@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <474e898e-b100-4e9e-8d28-ca18c0380bb3@w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving,uk.transport Subject: Re: Delete uk.rec.cycling.moderated? Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:38:58 -0700 (PDT) References:  <89mdthF9nmU4@mid.individual.net> <0f9cf720-d195-41e3-9a11-b0644f3268f9@j4g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <89o1ipFvd7U3@mid.individual.net> Lines: 22 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1278718738 6041 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2010 23:38:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 GTB7.1 GTBA,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2341 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:773454

On Jul 9, 8:31=A0am, Adrian  wrote: > Nuxx Bar  gurgled happily, sounding much lik= e > they were saying: > > > I disagree. > > What a surprise. JMS's only friend. The other troll who wrecked > uk.rec.cycling.

Hmm, yeah, never mind whether someone's actually talking sense, their identity is all that matters. Have you thought about becoming a URCM "moderator"? That mentality is a requirement, and also you certainly seem to subscribe to their, err, "expanded" definition of "troll". I don't remember you participating much in URC but I bow to your superior expertise on that newsgroup all the same. You think Chapman et al are blameless so that must be the case.

I'm sorry I bothered trying to reason with you. It's not the first time you've shown yourself to be stubbornly and determinedly wrong about something, and sadly it won't be the last. Still, I tried to be civil, unlike you.