Nuxx:41e965fc-dbc3-4cb7-9262-8678864ee22a@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <41e965fc-dbc3-4cb7-9262-8678864ee22a@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Name-Shifting ? Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:45:25 -0700 (PDT) References:       <77fb9vF1h90q7U1@mid.individual.net> <6aKdnX-Jr6ZIBo_XnZ2dnUVZ8t6dnZ2d@bt.com> <439cc49a-dc55-4d74-9c4b-37282eb064e9@o30g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>  <28m515hjo5ae88h7vkae9aspg782v2993h@4ax.com> Lines: 23 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.145.66.20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242755125 26976 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2009 17:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.145.66.20; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2758 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:702583

On May 19, 5:09=A0pm, Tom Crispin  wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:57:56 +0100, Judith Smith > >  wrote: > >You - and everyone else has yet to explain how someone could easily > >forge the IP address. > > Perhaps that it because no one believes it was forged. =A0We all know > that headers, including IP addresses, can be forged, but I don't > expect that anyone in urc has spent the time and trouble to work out > how to forge the IP header.

Even you must realise that Chapman is Lou Knee, even if you won't say so due to the "rule" that no-one must ever say anything against Chapman however warranted it is. Why else would Chapman have very carefully avoided answering the question "Did you post as Lou Knee"? Why on Earth would he not just have said "I didn't post as Lou Knee"? He's posted enough other shit to this thread.

You know he did it. Everyone does. His continued refusal to admit it just implicates him further regarding previous things that he's been accused of.