Nuxx:61de4429-cfa2-4f38-b07c-b4fca6e2c412@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!17g2000prr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <61de4429-cfa2-4f38-b07c-b4fca6e2c412@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:51:50 -0700 (PDT) References: <74d5df0d-37f8-43a7-a7d9-b5b6c6ec7934@a26g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <8u6kegFplvU1@mid.individual.net>  <8u6ps3F474U1@mid.individual.net>  Lines: 16 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300121511 26604 127.0.0.1 (14 Mar 2011 16:51:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 17g2000prr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2109 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38912

On Mar 14, 4:41=A0pm, Ian Jackson  wrote: > > (I hate the term "customer". =A0The users of urcm will not be treated as > "customers" - in particular, they will not be treated like shit while > we "monetise" them to "maximise shareholder^Wstakeholder value".)

I'll say this for you, unlike others you make no effort to hide your socialist (or anti-motorist) leanings. Now you just need to work on the extreme-intolerance-and-censorship-of-anyone-who-thinks- differently part.

(Where is the email about my ban which you said you were going to post? Is it the same one I posted?  Why is it so hard to get you to do anything you should be doing, even when you've offered to do it yourself?)