Nuxx:SSL3l.68683$he4.25027@newsfe22.ams2

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf02.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe22.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Troll Drawings Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:37:27 +0000 References:         <2Oz3l.39883$_I1.28296@newsfe13.ams2>   <93uuk4dmr2dadprkj496okbs5tr25htph7@4ax.com> Lines: 35 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <93uuk4dmr2dadprkj496okbs5tr25htph7@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.21.204.127 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe22.ams2 1229949464 82.21.204.127 (Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:37:44 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:37:44 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 3668 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:681604

Peter Grange wrote: > On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:35:44 +0000, _  wrote: > > >> You're either inordinately stupid, or just deliberately missing the >> point. Lets say, for the purpose of this particular conversation, that >> you're right that I'm a deliberate danger to every cyclist on the planet >> and go out of my way to maim them. It'll be sheer bollocks, but since >> you're so desperate to score points I'll let you have that one for the >> moment. No, there you go, you were right all along and I should be >> exterminated for being so prejudiced against cyclists. Now, are you >> paying attention? Here's the 64,000 dollar bit (i.e. the bit you snip >>from your crowing reply...) *Why* am I that way? Did I come to this >> group seeking nothing more than a confirmation of my loathing for all >> things bike? Am I a closet psychopath looking for a sector of society to >> despise? Hmmm, I dont think so. I can only have gained this new-found >> dislike as a direct result of interactions with posters here. So, as a >> group of cyclists, do you think you are doing the cause of cycling much >> good if you engender such reactions from those you are seeking to turn >> to your views? You're actually acting like a YTS version of Duhg, so >> bent on his cause that he cant see how many people he is turning *away* >>from it. But hey, ignore all that, right? Just focus on how well you've >> done, finally forcing another cager to admit he's got a death wish for >> anyone on a bike. *That's* why I suggested you're a bunch of 'tards... > > Perhaps if, like many posters to this newsgroup, you both drove a car > and rode a bicycle (not to be recommended at the same time, by the > way), you would see both sides of the argument and not come out with > such utter bollocks.

Nice to see reasoned argument there from the psycholists - well done! Still, now that you've mentioned it, would you care to point out exactly obvious innit' school of thinking? And you cretins wonder why you keep getting cut up? LMFAO!
 * where* the point I raised was bollocks, or does it fall into the 'its