Nuxx:52ab5c14-06fa-4b16-9e9a-3b4f790a1b8b@u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <52ab5c14-06fa-4b16-9e9a-3b4f790a1b8b@u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Update Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:32:18 -0700 (PDT) References: <0befc2d9-7545-4a6c-8bf5-0249e4140752@d12g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <8vgmntFvrmU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 55 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301571139 32067 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2011 11:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3634 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:39716

On Mar 30, 1:41=A0pm, Tony Raven  wrote: > Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > On Mar 29, 12:06 am, "Just zis Guy, you know?" > >  wrote: > > >> one was from Nuxx, 'nuff said > > > Thanks for reminding me, I need to tell the DVLA about that. > > >> and the other was an obvious Nuxxious sock with > >> the usual strawman version of my opinions and a nom de net that is an > >> obvious takeoff of mine. > > > If you're talking about "Only some chap I guess" then that was nothing > > to do with me. =A0How many times is that that you've wrongly accused > > me? =A0You always did have a problem accepting that people other than m= e > > also think you're a car-hating nutter who wants to bully motorists off > > the roads in any way possible, didn't you? > > If it wasn't you

It wasn't. Whatever else you might accuse me of, I don't lie.

> it was someone doing a very good parody.

It probably was a parody of me, although "very good" is stretching it...I preferred this one from Baron Bony-Ends, Champion Defender of URCM:

https://groups.google.com/group/uk.net.news.moderation/msg/7671a8becedf4fe3= ?hl=3Den

Anyway, although whoever it was probably has read my posts, it's not clear that they actually disagree with me: it's a matter of record that Chapman has called speeders (and therefore all drivers) "criminals", for example, and I should think he'd be very happy with prosecutions for 71mph on a motorway (why don't you ask him?)

I am certainly not the only person to think that Chapman is viciously anti-motorist, and that he considers making the roads deliberately more dangerous in the short term a "price worth paying" if it means that cars are removed from the roads in the long term. In any case, like Nob's parody, if the intention of this latest imitation was to annoy me then it's spectacularly failed, as it just made me laugh, whereas Chapman seems to be the one who's pompously annoyed.

> People have > distinctive writing styles and in this particular case, subject matters, > that mean it's either you or a really good impersonator IMO.

"Really good"? Are you sure you wouldn't just call any impersonation of me "really good", however poor it was, while refusing to acknowledge that any of the (much better) impersonations we've had of your friends like Chapman and Jackson have had any merit?