Nuxx:Dcb7a9bd-e64b-4b7c-8498-834b057ddbe6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Don't feed Troll Nuxx Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:20:03 -0700 (PDT) References:  <6jq2fvefivur$.k8gz7d6eeqym$.dlg@40tude.net> <8ceb44h398eoqg4te7kgeag399m6t4ljpm@4ax.com>   <68mdnRwqAryde9vVnZ2dnUVZ8sDinZ2d@pipex.net> Lines: 25 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.217.66 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212625204 13716 127.0.0.1 (5 Jun 2008 00:20:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.217.66; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008051206 Firefox/3.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2721 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:651965

On Jun 4, 7:59=A0pm, JNugent  wrote: > David Damerell wrote: > > Quoting =A0A.C.P.Crawshaw : > >> Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: > >>> It also assumes tat Nuxxy's idiocy is confined to Usenet. > >> He appears not to post in any other usenet forums though... > > I'm sure if you check uk.rec.driving or uk.transport for his > > characteristic illiteracies you'll find whose sock he is. > > I'm intrigued...

He's trying to sound like he knows something, but in reality, I can assure you that he knows nothing, because there's nothing to know. I'm sure you're used to such pathetic tactics from the trolls by now. I don't know whether he thought he was going to bluff me into some kind of admission or something. For such deceitful liars, the trolls are pretty bad at pulling the wool over people's eyes really.

If I was posting on another newsgroup, I'd be perfectly happy to use the same ID here. I have no problem with people knowing my attitude towards the utter twats who dominate this newsgroup. If you're anti- camera, you get flamed and called a troll here however reasonable you are (the trolls don't like their camera support being exposed as unscientific), so there doesn't seem much point in refraining from being direct and telling the trolls what you really think of them.