Nuxx:447c0e68-946b-4f01-81ba-d6f931be5ea8@q2g2000vbr.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!q2g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <447c0e68-946b-4f01-81ba-d6f931be5ea8@q2g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Speed and accident risk Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 07:42:29 -0700 (PDT) References: <8f68e9c1-ae83-4703-90e5-e6ae40b443ba@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <777csiF1gbitfU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 9 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.145.66.20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1242484949 5254 127.0.0.1 (16 May 2009 14:42:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q2g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.145.66.20; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 1612 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:701887

On May 16, 9:48=A0am, Matt B  wrote: > > The difficult bit though is how best to ensure the most appropriate and > safe speed for a given set of circumstances. > > What is the most effective way of ensuring safe speeds?

Apparently by forcing drivers to travel at a speed far below that which is appropriate, if you believe many here.