Nuxx:A731473d-aaee-4f90-ac2e-ddd2a81297a6@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: The wind and the rain Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:04:16 -0700 (PDT) References:   <28e9024f-7a31-4d7c-9cac-72a1428434eb@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 48 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.255.206 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222880656 21688 127.0.0.1 (1 Oct 2008 17:04:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.255.206; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008091620 Firefox/3.0.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3982 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669915

On Oct 1, 5:19=A0pm, Paul Boyd  wrote: > Nuxx Bar said the following on 01/10/2008 16:43: > > > Hello Roger. =A0Do you think that the fuckwit "_"'s ISP would be > > interested in *his* nasty posting habits? =A0Do you think it's > > reasonable for person A to systematically attempt to ruin *every* > > thread that person B starts, just because he'd rather not be reminded > > of the true facts that person B insists on posting? > > Oddly enough, I agree with you here! =A0At home, you are KF'ed. =A0End of > story. =A0Except that a certain tosser keeps filling the group with crap > every time you or certain other people post something to remind me that > you still exist. =A0Most of what you say is utter crap in my opinion, but > that's my opinion and I can KF you if I want. =A0I do object to one > individual deciding on the whole group's behalf that you're talking > utter crap though. =A0I can decide for myself who's a troll and who isn't= , > and FWIW I've KF'ed you because of the crap you spout rather than > because I think you're a troll.

Oh, thank you so much. But other than the "I talk crap" bit (it's really not crap, particular the stuff about speed-obsessed road "safety" policy being a very bad idea, but like me, you're entitled to your opinion), I agree wholeheartedly. "_"'s behaviour is evidence of his utter, unbelievable arrogance: whatever he thinks, everyone else has to think, and whatever he decides, everyone else has to go along with. I'd always thought of him as being one of the very worst posters in this group (in the top five, but much more boring than any of the others there), but at least he didn't usually post in the threads I read. Now, that's changed, and I (along, apparently, with many others) am now actively pissed off with him, and will remain so until he stops being a tosser in this particular way.

BTW, if you don't think I'm a troll, I'm puzzled that you haven't previously had more of a stab at "correcting" my "crap". I genuinely came here for a debate about road safety, but all I got was aggression, attempts at censorship and dodging of "difficult" points from the start, which is what makes me so certain that there are so many motorist-haters here who know that they can't defend cameras from a road safety point of view. I didn't notice you trying to have a sensible debate, but maybe you're just of the opinion that there's no point in trying to debate with someone whose point of view is so different to yours.

> Have a nice day :-)

I might have said the same back if I'd thought for a moment that you'd actually meant that.