Nuxx:Eep9f412uf3ej52hfq7fbi2l1oeknrrto1@4ax.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.pipex.net!news.pipex.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: You're Not Allowed To Say That  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Lower IQ People "More Likely To Support Speed Cameras" Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:39:33 +0100 References:  <20081014164835.398b7690@bluemoon> <6lk0ghFcngd2U2@mid.individual.net> Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:41:36 -0500 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.146.155 X-Trace: sv3-I4V9MnuSwKJUBBzrsxsnpZIIIZ9/hpCCbzUWOc0BKhpHglg4rJq3WI6UcYa44a1z51YDVphBLzb+p0K!GVf8u47SgcjTzdHlfBnuMNuuLUYDzIrmkluinGVmyx8pnXmV7T5BpzhcnPp3xwh5TjizDokqmaEz!x+4TZXCIzp3O54Q4pSUcGp0= X-Complaints-To: abuse@dsl.pipex.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@dsl.pipex.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.39 Bytes: 2387 X-Original-Bytes: 2323 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:672062

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:43:20 +0100, John  wrote:

>Rob Morley wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:17:47 +0100 >> Steve Tadley  wrote: >> >>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/1571469/Lower-IQ-people-more-likely-to-support-speed-cameras.html >>> >> ITYM >> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/1571469/42_percent_reduction_in_KSI_at_camera_sites.html > >Or even: > >

That's you branded as a "troll" for life. If you make a statement against cameras, then it doesn't matter how true it is, you'll be ostracised from here with no further ado. That's how you know that this group is full of people with a wish to make the roads safer by whatever means is shown to be best, rather than people who have an emotive, non-safety-related reason for supporting cameras (which is immune to logic) and therefore won't hear a word against them.