Nuxx:MPG.279aeaa9b7c0c383989869@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed0.kamp.net!news.qsc.de!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!shaftesbury.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Comments from URCM moderators and my reponse Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:20:47 -0000 References: <09e6bb69-2e74-42b3-aea7-75061b96e510@t23g2000vby.googlegroups.com>  <6cd434f0-eb03-417d-baff-a09bb86671e4@q18g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>     Lines: 38 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: befe5fc6.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=MYkbdC=>V]K:nkUV8[l9dCnok4Z\_4KE=9lfiIEn, guy@chapmancentral.co.uk says... > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1

Oh do shut up with your stupid loud capitals at the start of every message.

> On 14/01/2011 22:41, Tony wrote: > > A ban being something that hardly ever happens in moderated groups and so > > doesn't need a written policy. Except it's now been used once and > > threatened twice, still without a written policy. > > So that's three times?

You *know* that two people have been banned. You mentioned it just the other day. This is cast iron proof (as if it were needed) that you wilfully disregard the facts when they don't suit the "argument" that you're making at the time.

> In a group that was created in response to rampant trolling?

Ah, so you admit that it was basically created to keep certain people and opinions out, and of course that's why you've always been such a strong supporter.

> I'd say that fit's under "hardly ever". It's a situation where Clue is > more important than rules anyway.

I would *love* it if you were banned...your reaction and U-turning would be wonderful to witness. Of course it won't happen because you're one of the most spitefully anti-car psycholists of all.

Still sticking to the line that you don't want to be a "moderator" because you "haven't got time"? Do you really think anyone believes that over the real reason (you're not confident enough that they'd want such a controversial figure as you)?