Nuxx:3d40a614-fad2-4d01-b4b4-148ff2be5fae@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3d40a614-fad2-4d01-b4b4-148ff2be5fae@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: OT: Safespeed perceptions Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:09:06 -0700 (PDT) References:       <04c90d5f-2cd4-4d08-ab84-851016c14bed@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>  <8c88ba66-c47c-46f8-9129-547ec728501b@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>    <6fam20Fake4qU2@mid.individual.net> Lines: 28 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217470146 10671 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2008 02:09:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2884 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:659809

On Jul 30, 8:56=A0am, "Dave Larrington"  wrote: > Innews:slrng8uski.orn.ian@acheron.astounding.org.uk, > Ian Smith  tweaked the Babbage-Engine to tell us: > > > On Tue, 29 Jul, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > >> =A0Why would someone be so worried about their identity being > >> =A0traceable? > > > So, you're saying Mr and Mrs Bar really and truly christened you Nuxx? > > If he/she/it came from New Toyland, they could have been called "Number 1= 6 > Bus Shelter", so the possibility of Nuxy-Wuxy *really* being called "Nuxx= " > should not be dismissed lightly. > > The *opinions* of the soi-disant Nuxx, OTOH, should be weighted down with > stones and thrown into the nearest flooded gravel pit.

Yep. Must censor the opposition, especially when the opposition is threatening to expose awkward truths, e.g. "Cameras cost lives" and "The trolls on urc have an anti-motorist agenda".

I would never try to stop someone having an opinion, however wrong it was, and the fact that you and your anti-motorist friends seek to do so is telling.