Nuxx:4aab6d53-6d98-4f6c-9121-a21b6e136da3@j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <4aab6d53-6d98-4f6c-9121-a21b6e136da3@j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: Amend charter of uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:45:25 -0700 (PDT) References:  <905ak5FeinU1@mid.individual.net>   <20110408232350.379c39fb@bluemoon>  Lines: 20 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1302309925 6656 127.0.0.1 (9 Apr 2011 00:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 00:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.16) Gecko/20110319 Firefox/3.6.16,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2277 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:123558

On Apr 8, 11:53=A0pm, Geoff Berrow  wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:23:50 +0100, Rob Morley  > wrote: > > >The committee is concerned with the well-being and good management of > >the uk.* hierarchy - if they see a group suffering as a result of > >mismanagement they have every reason to intervene. > > Except the committee is not intervening. In fact, it cannot. > > Individual members, who are committee members because they concerned > with the well-being and good management of uk.* do, quite naturally, > take an interest.

And you can bet that if URCM wasn't being run according to how Tony Raven and Phil Lee wanted (i.e. their opinions weren't the ones being blatantly favoured), then they wouldn't be satisfied with the "People are using it so it's no-one else's business" line.

URCM is not a private club, however much some would like it to be.