Nuxx:A7c4abe3-53e6-42aa-8d6c-b8c7ed847cb1@b74g2000hsg.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!b74g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: List Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:05:41 -0800 (PST) References:   <61baahF1uoq6gU2@mid.individual.net>  <8e908739-4e1b-489e-b2d6-23516a7f2b68@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Lines: 51 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.211.165.120 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1202994342 24526 127.0.0.1 (14 Feb 2008 13:05:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b74g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.211.165.120; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4029 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:640119

On Feb 11, 8:36 pm, dkahn400  wrote: > On Feb 11, 7:44 pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > > They won't let us drive wherever and whenever we like at any speed and > > > in any manner we like in any vehicle we might want to! Bastards! > > > And people say that I'm a troll. > > I think people assumed you meant anti-motorist measures that were > actually in force, but of course there aren't any.

Are you a liar or just blind? Are you seriously contending that there are *no* anti-motorist measures whatsoever in the UK? Do you realise how ridiculous that sounds? Do you realise just how obvious it is that you're talking rubbish?

> If you mean all > possible anti-motorist measures then I am happy to go on record and > say that I am utterly opposed to arbitrary machine gunning of > motorists.

Yeah right. I'm sure you are.

So the strategy is to pretend that there are no anti-motorist measures, so that it supposedly can't be shown that you are in favour of such things. Except that it doesn't work. Because even if you deny that such measures are anti-motorist, plenty of others beg to differ. And when you just happen to support every measure that many believe to be anti-motorist, I'm afraid the game's up and it's obvious what you really think, pathetic strategies notwithstanding. I'll be along with a list of such measures later, and when none of you can say that you oppose a single one of them, then it'll be game, set and match, and you can whinge about how they're "not anti-motorist measures" as much as you like; it won't make a difference, because it's just lies, and they're all you have left.

The whole thing's ridiculous. It would be like me getting 200 black people into a room, asking a racist if he hated them, and the racist saying "Yes, I do hate each one of them, but they're not black people, so I'm not racist". The racist is not only a racist bastard, but he's telling pathetic, obvious lies in a futile effort to avoid being labelled as a racist. And that's exactly the same as someone seeing a list of anti-motorist measures and saying "Yes, I do agree with each one of them, but they're not anti-motorist measures, so I'm not a motorist-hater". It's PATHETIC and it won't stop the truth emerging.

I still don't understand why you don't all just admit to being anti- motorist. Why lie? Or are you in denial? It really is very strange. You obviously feel very strongly about how bad cars are, particularly the Cycling+ trolls with their hate campaigns, so the lying just seems totally pointless.