Nuxx:MPG.26b4106dfbc7c39a9897cf@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!192.87.166.28.MISMATCH!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Felicity Whorefeatures  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Is there a newsgroup for cycling as a recreation Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:48:20 +0100 References:  <0ofh465c5jdip0r7j2d68lql3qe2hdtdat@4ax.com> Lines: 35 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100723-0, 23/07/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: b92f6785.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=Y, guy.chapman@spamcop.net says... > > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:32:35 +0100, "Mentalguy2k8" >  wrote: > > >without the cars v bikes agenda? > > > >Where do people go when they want to ask about tyres pressures, training > >routines and recovery drinks for example??? > > uk.rec.cycling.moderated

But if you like URCM so much, and URC has become "unusable" like you say, and you "don't read URC", and URC's a "cesspool" with "virtually no signal" and "all the worthwhile stuff's on URCM" then why have you started...reading URC again? Did you get fed up with having no-one to fight because all your enemies kept getting their opinions censored on URCM? Wanted to do some more wallowing in shit?

Hope you're as pleased as I am about Oxfordshire losing its scameras. No doubt you'll now refuse to go there because it'll be so much more dangerous than before? Oh no, that's right, you know cameras don't really improve KSIs (Swindon KSIs predictably haven't risen), you just pretend to think that as an excuse to advocate cameras because you hate cars and you want drivers to be punished. So you'll be going into Oxfordshire just as much as before, and when the KSIs don't rise, you won't express any surprise, just like when Swindon's KSIs didn't rise (if you had been remotely sincere about your stated reasons for camera advocacy then you *would* have expressed surprise, but you didn't, which just makes it even more obvious than before what your real motivation is).

Oh, and did you post as Lou Knee? (Ouch...how many inconvenient truths must you endure within a single post?)