Nuxx:MPG.2799d647b7e1d06f989863@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!txtfeed2.tudelft.nl!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Comments from URCM moderators and my reponse Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:41:35 -0000 References: <09e6bb69-2e74-42b3-aea7-75061b96e510@t23g2000vby.googlegroups.com> Lines: 30 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: bdcaaf92.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=gUNHW7RW:IeIK_Y]^Ljehj0g@SS;SF6ngRiiCXJE[K>gSNfQ2b6hJ[``:ITG5aA:cgAIfdkooYNVl X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 2366 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:36212

In article <09e6bb69-2e74-42b3-aea7-75061b96e510 @t23g2000vby.googlegroups.com>, toom@tabard.orangehome.co.uk says... > > The fact that you are afraid perhaps explains the delay in the > courtesy of a reply to my many and varied attempts to contact you.

You have the wrong opinions, ergo they don't want you to post to URCM, ergo you are doomed not to get anywhere no matter how much you assume good faith and try to reason with The Moderatorship. You're probably well aware of that already but I just wanted to point it out on the offchance that you weren't.

URCM was formed to protect sensitive self-deluding little flowers from particular opinions/facts that they couldn't cope with reading. That was the intention all along and we were cynically deceived at the RFD stage. Until those who perpetrated that deceit are removed, this unfortunate situation will continue, and there is no point in trying to get them to see sense.

You only have to look at who URCM's principal remaining outside supporters are: Chapman and Phil Lee. That tells you everything you need to know.

> Perhaps you could have the courtesy to reply to the above in a timely > manner

"Tragically comical" I think you could call that. If you're actually expecting any quarter whatsoever from the "moderators" as a result of your post then I can promise you that you're going to be disappointed. You won't be the first.