Nuxx:Dc84f2f7-7fa5-458a-bb80-97b7ca180616@n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.16.MISMATCH!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: U.r.c.m Moderation policy Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:25:21 -0700 (PDT) References: <490c60af-ed30-4080-ad72-e8d35056e89f@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <46pe4557rj1e1psg97h2aljsp28ecqrp39@4ax.com>  <171k45p9mgajmp2mi9qoah4s68ddk1o73i@4ax.com> <4LfobtGNygSKFwFe@[127.0.0.1]>   <060d40f6-1a3a-4119-abce-6ef7606d9794@k8g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 26 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.153.43.239 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1246393521 12859 127.0.0.1 (30 Jun 2009 20:25:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.153.43.239; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2906 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:54770 uk.rec.cycling:6206

On Jun 30, 5:58=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > I am pretty sure that I also have evidence of Nuxx being TOSd,

Funny that, since it doesn't happen. What is this "evidence"? There isn't any, is there? You just made it up, and said "pretty sure" so that your precious "God" doesn't strike you down for lying (even though it is still a lie).

> and the crank calls certainly happened.

You said you had "evidence" for that as well. What is it? Funny how you went quiet when you were asked. There's none, is there, because the calls never happened, did they? Liar.

> Nully likes to cast doubt on > that (as does judith) but it is not the kind of thing where evidence > should be shared publicly, though I don't mind discussing it privately > with anybody I trust.

You mean, anyone you think you can trust to keep up the deception when you tell them that actually the calls didn't happen and you're just making it up for the "greater good"? Why can't you share the evidence with me? If you're going to accuse me of things then you owe me that much.