Nuxx:WEzwl.133760$dm3.48843@newsfe27.ams2

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf02.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe27.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.transport Subject: Re: Lords reject London anti-bike chaining law Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:26:22 +0000 References: <7f4eca40-e374-4e61-9e55-9c1b1f8450e7@t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 	 	<76868a11-d02e-4df3-a0d1-27a401e47851@41g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> 	<72c0h5FopckeU2@mid.individual.net>  	<72c6bjFopckeU9@mid.individual.net> <816f7ccb-17a3-4c49-a46d-a426183b9039@t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 	<72ctu3Fp508lU3@mid.individual.net> <902961fd-3a59-40cb-8463-730ff5a21753@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com> 	<72e9pqFph89hU1@mid.individual.net> <07747838-e267-4376-bfea-91d580208343@h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <07747838-e267-4376-bfea-91d580208343@h20g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.12.82.202 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe27.ams2 1237501596 86.12.82.202 (Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:26:36 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:26:36 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2529 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:690174

Doug wrote: > On 19 Mar, 07:16, Adrian  wrote: >> Doug  gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >> saying: >> >>>>> No example then, as usual. Just your usual empty assertions. >>>> I could post a dozen examples, easily. But you wouldn't know what to do >>>> with the MessageIDs. >>> Still nothing from you then? >> No, I cannot be bothered to post a shitload of irrefutable proof that >> you'll completely ignore. Again. >> > What you really mean is you can't and I can't be bothered to keep on > responding to your endless evasions. >>> How long do you think you can keep this up? >> You've been managing for years. >> > So you are following my alleged example instead of trying to hack it > on your own? > Nah, I think I'll just get you thrown off (yet another) ISP instead...