Nuxx:MPG.27a0a7922b6839f6989884@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: ULM Rejection Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 07:48:06 -0000 References:  <8pdgcsF66fU1@mid.individual.net>    <1jv6rh3.1mt74ue1uofnggN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>   Lines: 22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: cf23b946.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=aU_N8RQaYaB0`W9, jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk says... > > On 2011-01-16, Just zis Guy, you know?  wrote: > > You missed the point rather badly there. > > > > If JMS had said in the original post that the website was mine, would > > you have approved the post? > > I seem to recall that I approved the original post. Looking at it > again, no obvious reason that it should be rejected if it named the > website it was quoting from leaps out at me. I assumed it might well > be from your website when I approved the post, but I didn't check to > be sure since I did not believe it would make any difference if it > was.

Quite clearly the post should have been rejected for "disagreeing with Guy Chapman". (This of course is by no means the first time that Chapman has attempted to deflect a valid opposing argument by calling it a "vendetta" or "personal attack". I think it's a cynical underhand tactic rather than paranoia.  Good that you're not falling for it anyway.)