Nuxx:21fad5bb-898c-43ac-8280-fda503ebdcd5@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <21fad5bb-898c-43ac-8280-fda503ebdcd5@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: urc's resident "troll feeder" Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:52:32 -0800 (PST) References:   <6evqn4lvv6j6jufjh3ejsuv34fptiv7a7h@4ax.com>  Lines: 28 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.151.152.80 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1232995953 9320 127.0.0.1 (26 Jan 2009 18:52:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.151.152.80; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2699 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:684065

On Jan 26, 9:47=A0am, Andy Leighton  wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:11:42 +0000, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Just zis Guy, you know?  wrote: > > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:25:30 +0100, Tosspot  > > said in : > > >>And I thought they'd both flown south for the winter, I hadn't seen > >>either of them in ages. =A0Oh well, see how it pans out. > > > No, nuxxy is still ranting and judith is still nym-shifting like > > crazy, and a few people (not me) are responding to both. > > > If Trevor wants to use his killfile for argumentative people then > > that's his prerogative. =A0I know I am slow to diagnose trolls. > > Which is part of the problem. =A0Do you think that Tony Dragon is a > cyclist? =A0Or even someone who replies in a fair and even-handed > manner? =A0Do you think you should continue to reply to him until > he joins the mono-maniacs here?

You're right. He doesn't hate motorists, and therefore he should be ignored. Care to name one example of someone who sticks up for motorists that you're happy to have here? You can't, can you? Why are you and your ilk so hellbent on censoring those who argue with the motorist-haters? Is it because you know they have the truth on their side? No other remotely logical explanation has ever been proposed.