Nuxx:6b60719b-4018-4366-ada9-39a0bcbed446@k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <6b60719b-4018-4366-ada9-39a0bcbed446@k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Straw Poll Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:10:22 -0800 (PST) References: <2Ck*3jHwt@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>    <1jxapzn.axav6511u1wn1N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> <9lshm65i6q5pfdrcnfjmkr4rpormkcu0ao@4ax.com> <4c45e8eb-d917-4147-8b19-13d23215f9b6@m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> <1jxavd6.16vutqdvmqcrvN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk> <935im6155d9htm57m1g35fkekhth70f047@4ax.com> Lines: 14 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298740222 8446 127.0.0.1 (26 Feb 2011 17:10:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k38g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2239 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38060

On Feb 26, 3:01=A0pm, Tom Crispin  wrote: > > There is more to: "You are mistaken. is 100 per cent decent > and incorruptible." than immediately apparent.

Too subtle for me obviously. I thought maybe it was something about "decent" also meaning "fully clothed". But that doesn't seem to go anywhere. I don't know whether it needs to be read in conjunction with what you were replying to or not. But I'm probably more worried about it than I should be. :-)

(Did you see the post of mine to URCM which got approved?! Somewhat more controversial than your rejected one!  Now I don't know whether I'm banned or not....)