Nuxx:MPG.268db457bab95bf69897a9@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM: Yet Another Blatant Example of Double Standards Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:29:17 +0100 References:  <4c239bf4$0$2527$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk> Lines: 12 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100624-1, 24/06/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: b18fb988.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=O?n3U1L4R6meBWYdG]_DibYjZGX^207Pk`=oh_MG3U3^4D?m X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 1452 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:31395

In article <4c239bf4$0$2527$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>, ja@averyjim.myzen.co.uk says... > > I'm flattered!

I don't really know why I'm bothering to ask, but do you think that if I, JMS or MattB had written a post like that, it would have been let through?

Do you care if URCM is being run as a private club, as long as people with opinions like yours are the ones being given hugely preferential treatment?