Nuxx:D5i9f4th1et90r9ldsoo9k03dtffh63ug7@4ax.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.pipex.net!news.pipex.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: "Motorist-Hater-Hater"  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Side Effects Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:09:49 +0100 References: <7p58f49n67ev658u752omb6qt1n8grp5sr@4ax.com> <6lj4oeFcgvotU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:14:58 -0500 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.146.155 X-Trace: sv3-tfYMqoT1UV4JOU5f72YJPk3YlWckzGPUmoQtjlWM0fgacnHU46+rgCjofLwAi/hsEy2MVKdchCBQAWL!38IKcsQY7KjkVv9CA7zPPX9MZfeSvS561T6R4DcQHf/aFwxzLSVQK4oAI28EYDx98BXi9mtmAmvG!JMsfc6gSkmkz2bLi6YXupw4= X-Complaints-To: abuse@dsl.pipex.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@dsl.pipex.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.39 Bytes: 2420 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:827503

On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:49:13 +0100, "Dave Larrington"  wrote:

>In news:7p58f49n67ev658u752omb6qt1n8grp5sr@4ax.com, >some pissweasel fuckpuppet wrote: >> Look, lurkers! No-one here has *ever* so much as attempted to rebut a >> *single one* of the following list of side effects of speed cameras. > >Here is how much we care: 0

I couldn't possibly have put it better myself. The safety effects of cameras are totally irrelevant to you as you only support cameras for non-safety-related reasons. Lurkers, take note.

Dave Larrington makes it abundantly clear that he supports speed cameras. Dave Larrington then says he "doesn't care" when someone lists large numbers of deadly side effects that cameras come with. What other explanation is there but "Dave Larrington supports cameras solely for anti-motorist reasons"? If he and the others supported cameras for safety-related reasons, they would have long since at least attempted to rebut the list. If I supported cameras for safety-related reasons, I certainly would have, and so would anyone else. But *none of these posters ever have*.

Yet again the "We're not anti-motorist" lie is spectacularly blown apart. You trolls are too easy.