Nuxx:23dc1db4-58dd-4e4f-ac7a-98115971807b@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <23dc1db4-58dd-4e4f-ac7a-98115971807b@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Don't feed Troll Nuxx Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:44:00 -0700 (PDT) References:  <6jq2fvefivur$.k8gz7d6eeqym$.dlg@40tude.net> <8ceb44h398eoqg4te7kgeag399m6t4ljpm@4ax.com>   <83c7102d-8972-4ad7-9b8d-99741d196cd9@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 42 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.217.66 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1213134240 27465 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2008 21:44:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.217.66; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3747 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:652595

On Jun 5, 9:42=A0am, Ian Smith  wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:16:03 +0100, Just zis Guy, you know? = wrote: > > =A0On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 16:59:09 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar > >  said in > > <83c7102d-8972-4ad7-9b8d-99741d196...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>: > > > >Amazing how *everyone* else who comments on my writing at all tells > > >me how good it is, yet certain trolls go on about "illiteracies". > > > =A0aka "the lurkers support me in email". > > I don't think it's that sophisticated an argument. > > As far as I can see, what he said was "It's only the people that > criticise my writing that criticise my writing."

If you say so, Jellybelly. You never were the sharpest tool in the box. Are you looking forward to your adventure BTW?

It's perfectly simple. Apart from the trolls, many people, both off and on the Internet, have gone out of their way to comment on my writing, and such comments have always been positive. Yet the trolls here talk about "illiteracies". So what's more likely, do you think? That my writing is poor, or that the trolls simply say that the truth is the opposite to what it is if they find that reality doesn't fit with their lunatic, agenda-driven arguments? What's more likely? That cameras really do work, despite all the science saying otherwise, or that the trolls simply pretend that cameras work because they have an anti-motorist agenda? Altering reality to suit their arguments: it's one of the more crude ways in which the trolls dishonestly try (and invariably fail) to get the upper hand in discussions.

The really scary thing is that some of the more mentally disturbed trolls (Spindrift springs to mind) probably convince even themselves that their lies are true. It could well be that Spindrift is the only troll here who honestly believes that speed cameras work, such is his wish for that to be true. It's still the product of a warped anti- motorist agenda though, otherwise he wouldn't have persuaded himself that it was true in the first place. Sad though, that people like him are prepared to do damage to their already fragile minds just so that they can make things worse for motorists.