Nuxx:58bbf974-7b02-4806-9a1f-42747b4ee257@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <58bbf974-7b02-4806-9a1f-42747b4ee257@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:55:23 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>    Lines: 26 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243374923 4569 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2009 21:55:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2542 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:849610 uk.net.news.config:126079

On May 26, 9:22=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 15:35:30 -0400, "Anthony R. Gold" > >  wrote: > >Although IMO the proponent has no duty to answer anything, it may be unw= ise > >for him to read this discussion through a killfile. =A0If he fails to in= clude > >a fair Summary of Discussion that includes all positions, including the > >ones with which he disagrees, in any Call for Votes then his proposal wi= ll > >be opposed and voted against for that reason alone. > > Yes. =A0I doubt if nuxx will bother replying

I do want to be in the group. I object to Ian Jackson having anything to do with it, and I especially object to you being a moderator, but I want to be in uk.rec.cycling.moderated in whatever form it ends up taking, and I have just as much right to be there as you or anyone else.

I will post on-topic, non-abusive material which is "sympathetic to cycling", and we'll see just how long it takes for me to be banned simply for my opinions. Almost worth running a sweepstake, except that I don't think there's too much doubt about how long it'll take.