Nuxx:D271e765-11cc-486a-9542-9d1fef74d813@32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:35:37 -0700 (PDT) References:   <1b578d11-adc3-470c-8475-a2b0ac04c014@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <5f6768f6-e7e9-4adc-b012-7fe243af9335@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>       Lines: 44 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247164537 11728 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2009 18:35:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 32g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3464 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:6966 uk.net.news.config:55820

On Jul 9, 4:08=A0pm, jms  wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:37:09 +0100, Roger Thorpe > >You do know what 'trolling' is, don't you? > > Yes for urc: > > To post views which are against the views of the regulars: > > If you propose =A0that cycle helmets are worth while wearing - then you > are trolling. > > If you comment that cycling is more dangerous than walking as a means > of transport and post figures to prove it - then you are trolling. > > If you show that cyclehelmets.org is not the fair and balanced site > some would have it is : then you are trolling. > > If you propose that mandatory cycle lanes should be what the name > implies - then you are trolling. > > There are many more I can give you =A0- but I think it shows I > understand the term

Couldn't agree more. Roger Thorpe and all the other "regulars" know damn well that that's the case. Why deny it? Can they provide any examples of people that have said the above things and haven't been accused of "trolling"? Of course not. We all know exactly what the deal is, so why do we keep hearing lies about it?

> I do not think that I have called *you* a fuckwit - or indeed many of > the =A0people in urc. > > =A0I reserve the term for those who are: > > Chapman is a fuckwit > Anchor Lee is a fuckwit. > Bilbo Braggins is a fuckwit

Don't forget the fuckwit Taylor. Spindrift as well, and probably Jackson, and Clinch (remember him?) Maybe one or two others, but that's all the main ones, and it's no accident that Chapman's first on the list (and doesn't he just love being there? There's no way he'd behave like he did unless he loved to be despised, and/or was seriously mentally ill.)