Nuxx:De330aa5-62bf-465d-8696-2a1d950eaa6a@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: primary position/ride well clear DfT advice Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:25:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <59a9bc17-0272-4ac5-bc14-bd59b2f935a0@c12g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <75ah0dF176899U1@mid.individual.net>  Lines: 21 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.154.123.12 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240543522 25148 127.0.0.1 (24 Apr 2009 03:25:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.154.123.12; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2090 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:697592

On Apr 23, 2:55=A0pm, thaksin  wrote: > Paul - xxx wrote: > > Nick L Plate wrote: > > >> It may not be in the highway code, but it will be. > >> See: > >>http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/drs/cyclingandmotorcycling/drives > >> afecyclesafe > > > Seems a pretty balanced set of viewpoints, and also seems to be written > > by both cyclists and motorists for mutual benefits. > > > For a change, stuff like this is normally (it seems) pretty polarised > > depending on who writes it .. ;) > > I said pretty much that, and got slated for it! Case of 'shoot the > messenger', perhaps :)

That's because you've been identified as a "troll" (i.e. someone who asks difficult questions which make the clique's beloved anti-motorist measures look bad).