Nuxx:7a784cff-ade8-4dcb-a186-62f2892ac99f@u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <7a784cff-ade8-4dcb-a186-62f2892ac99f@u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM is now dead Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:01:02 -0800 (PST) References:        <466dm69klhdmhoerl098fce524g8743hj3@4ax.com> Lines: 61 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298570462 24964 127.0.0.1 (24 Feb 2011 18:01:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:01:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u3g2000vbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3926 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:37883

On Feb 24, 5:46=A0pm, Judith  wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:59:20 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?" > > > >  wrote: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA1 > > >On 24/02/2011 16:57, Tom Crispin wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:36:18 +0000, "Just zis Guy, you know?" > >>  wrote: > > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>> Hash: SHA1 > > >>> On 24/02/2011 13:33, Mr. Benn wrote: > >>>> "Ian Jackson"  wrote in message > >>>>news:w4q*Hszwt@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk... > >>>>> In article , > >>>>> Ian Jackson =A0 wrote: > >>>>>> I agree that there is a big problem. > > >>>>> To put some numbers on that, from the recent rejection logs, we hav= e > >>>>> in the last 3 days rejected 8 postings, from 6 separate people, > >>>>> essentially because they were complaints about Matt's behaviour. > > >>>> For "behaviour" read "opinions". > > >>> No, behaviour. He has a soapbox and he keeps getting on it and making > >>> the same old points. It is very boring. > > >> Then ignore. > > >I do. I no longer see a word he writes, other than in quoted replies. > > It takes a certain sort of person to tell the world that so-and-so is > in a kill-file. > > It shows how intolerant you are. - and yet you have to brag about it > as well. > > Don't make the same mistake as you did with me - switching back and > forth with googlegroups so that you could pretend that you had only > read my posts by accident.

Yes, that was a classic, even for Chapman. And that after he'd replied to me as Lou Knee despite me being "killfiled" as well.

He's also been known to complain on UNNM about particular things that Matt B has posted on URCM, even though he "hasn't read" them. It's a bit silly lying about it when he could just say that he reads all our posts but doesn't deem them worthy of responses.

But the fact that he *does* lie about it shows that it's not "God" which prevents him from lying, it's whether he thinks anyone else has a chance of finding out that he's lying. Clearly he's not very good at judging that either. So it would seem that for someone like him, honesty is definitely the best policy, yet he's the most deceitful person I "know". "Has no problem with lying coolly and easily...."