Nuxx:D6f7a603-df2f-4198-832c-5a0310c6f409@m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Primary rubbish Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 01:13:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <4a191569_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <4a191832$1_4@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>  <4a191a90$1_3@mk-nntp-2.news.uk.tiscali.com>   <77tt2nF1jg3juU1@mid.individual.net>   <1vGdnfEmmITQ9IfXnZ2dnUVZ8gFi4p2d@pipex.net>  Lines: 43 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243325588 10658 127.0.0.1 (26 May 2009 08:13:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 08:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3849 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:829478

On May 25, 12:04=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 04:47:57 -0500, "Mr. Benn" <%%@%%.%> wrote: > >Hello Lou. > > You appear to have fallen into the trap of believing judith's > proof-by-assertion. =A0If you'd been paying attention you'd have noticed > posts from Lou Knee at multiple other IPs, plus at least one from him > saying that he is not me. > >  > > I don't know about what judith claims in detail, I killfile each of > her new nyms as it arrives (oh the irony: urc's worst nym-shifter > bitching endlessly about alleged nym-shifting!), but I do know from > long past experience that simply being provably wrong has never been > sufficient for her to withdraw an allegation against me or anybody > else she has decided to hate. =A0She's as mad as a badger and completely > proof against logic.

Just answer this question and it'll all go away: did you post as Lou Knee?

> >You failed to comment on my suggestion of mandatory traning for cyclists= . =A0 > >For some reason, you only picked up on the bit about drivers. > > That's because it was covered by the rest of the response. =A0Cycling is > a mode, like walking, which is open to all, young and old. Requiring > training would deter cycling, a desirable activity according to the > public health types, for no obvious benefit. =A0When cyclists are killed > or seriously injured, it is usually not their fault. =A0Training the > drivers does not seem to have prevented that, and indeed most adult > cyclists already hold a driving license so have some degree of > training in road traffic law. =A0It's not clear how compulsory training > of cyclists would change this. =A0It is simply sour grapes on the part > of frustrated motorists who are spending anything up to 10% of their > disposable income for the privilege of sitting in a queue of > like-minded people, only to be overtaken by someone who they > (generally inaccurately) believe has paid nothing for the privilege.

What a load of utter, utter shit, even by your standards. Truly laughable.