Nuxx:8b652d53-8f49-49a3-8993-b6245a03591f@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!8g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <8b652d53-8f49-49a3-8993-b6245a03591f@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Well Done! Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:52:52 -0700 (PDT) References: <0d98876c-e050-4e91-bfda-139cb3270812@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>  <985aaddb-5e7a-49ec-bd70-65968171dfb2@a9g2000prl.googlegroups.com> Lines: 44 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.150.187 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1208335973 1023 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2008 08:52:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.150.187; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008032620 Firefox/3.0b5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3162 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:647436

On Apr 14, 9:21=A0am, Sir Jeremy  wrote: > On 13 Apr, 16:21, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 05:40:39 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar > >  said in > > <0d98876c-e050-4e91-bfda-139cb3270...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>: > > > >So, not one troll has attempted to counter one thing that Paul Smith > > >said. > > > Correct. =A0Though many well-informed people with a better grip on > > reality than either you or Smith (which, lets face it, does not > > narrow the field very much) have posted authoritative rebuttals of > > most of his drivelling nonsense. > > > Best bit is, I was actually interviewed by Which? magazine for that > > piece where they exposed his "one in three" argument as the > > delusional bullshit it always was. The journalist's private views on > > Smith were even less flattering than my views of him, which takes a > > bit of doing. > > > Guy > > -- > > May contain traces of irony. =A0Contents liable to settle after posting.= http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk > > > 85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound > > You've got that arse about tit- Paul exposed the Governments "one in > three" argument as the delusional bullshit. =A0Who gives a fuck what > your or some anonymous journalists opinions are anyway?

Quite. I always respected Which? until that article. I didn't realise they'd interviewed Crapman, but that in itself demonstrates that their whole approach to cameras was biased from the start. I suspect that people at Which? have ties with camera manufacturers, SCPs and/or the government, and like the car-hating arsewipes, they prioritise these selfish interests above the saving of road users' lives.

No number of self-serving monsters can keep the truth under wraps forever though.