Nuxx:Be923da8-f05c-46eb-ae51-2355175d9bb8@v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Moderated cycling group : posts rejected Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 17:10:32 -0700 (PDT) References:      Lines: 32 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1302048632 22005 127.0.0.1 (6 Apr 2011 00:10:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 00:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2897 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:40371

On Apr 5, 10:34 pm, Tom Crispin  wrote: > On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:21:42 +0100, Mark Goodge > >  wrote: > >On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:14:56 +0100, Micky Frost put finger to keyboard and > >typed: > > >>Does that mean I cannot post to the group, even if I use my Virgin > >>address? How do you think I should provide evidence that I am not > >>that other person? > > >As Clive George has already said, the best way of doing that is to build up > >a posting history in other groups. > > I thought that it was explicitly stated during the RFD that posting > history in other groups would not count for anything.

Yes, I thought the same thing on reading Kleiv Jawj's post.

I wonder if Kleiv will still want to be a moderator in the "new" URCM? If so then he may find that continually aligning himself with the current problem "moderators" is far from helpful to his case.

Still, nice to know that the current "moderators" have learnt from their mistakes with Andy Crawford. Or rather, they haven't learnt a thing and are sending the message loudly and clearly that they have no intention of ever playing ball. They would rather be forced out than moderate fairly. To them, there's no point in "moderating" URCM at all if they can't abuse their power in order to keep out people and opinions they don't like. So they're just going to carry on in exactly the same way until they're finally stopped. Even their staunchest defenders (NAming no NAmes) know that in reality.