Nuxx:B6d860c0-86d2-4889-820f-49cb14d48771@k41g2000yqh.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k41g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.transport Subject: Re: "Primary Position" Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 07:08:56 -0700 (PDT) References:  <311722ede2d9fc46a333c700701656dd@pseudo.borked.net> <86jat4t2rekv8j3lpdn3j7gvst0skqnf06@4ax.com> Lines: 30 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.147 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1238854136 673 127.0.0.1 (4 Apr 2009 14:08:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k41g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.147; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2638 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:828674

On Apr 3, 12:46=A0am, Judith Smith  wrote: > I am opposed to: > > the fuckwits in urc who think that they have some special dispensation > to chose which laws they obey. > > those who are obviously anti-motorist. > > those who will lie and lie over particular issues rather than admit > they are wrong (The fuckwit Chapman is No 1 at this game) > > those who cannot stand any criticism - and who eventually have to > respond - "you are a troll" - as they lose the argument and often the > plot. > > those who think they have been elected to decide who can contribute to > urc.

I think the fuckwit Chapman is No 1 at all those things actually! Plus being despised by thousands upon thousands of Internet users (conservative estimate), being homophobic, being totally unable/ unwilling to admit when he's been proved wrong or his lies have been exposed, being morally equivalent to a murderer, dismissing as "drivel" any argument that he knows that he can't challenge, cheating on his wife, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

"Fuckwit" is too kind in fact; "arch-fuckwit" would be closer to the mark, if only somewhat. "Fuckwit" is also too kind for Taylor, of course, although he's just a shade less bad than Chapman (goes without saying...*no-one* is as bad as Chapman).