Nuxx:A34a5449-49f9-4a29-8455-4540b4d85bcc@k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: delete newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 16:46:58 -0700 (PDT) References:    <16dcc222-271c-4a9d-bdb8-c414b8e45721@n8g2000prh.googlegroups.com>   <1jlbyef.8nl4511ijso08N%alan@darkroom.+.com>      <39286cf6-47e6-4913-895f-8d46dc90b943@g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> Lines: 22 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1278719218 9332 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2010 23:46:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 23:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 GTB7.1 GTBA,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2942 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:61453

On Jul 9, 11:33=A0am, Trollsworth LeTrole  wrote: > > Nuxx Bar/ > Dr.Tad Winslow/St.Michael Chapman/whatever he wants to call himself

...except that "St. Michael Chapman" was clearly a parody of me, and Nobby Anderson has admitted responsibility. Still, you know best.

I was pleased that someone had written an RFD on URCM, but now I realise that you've made it intentionally shite because you want the group to carry on as it is. And like pretty much everyone else I don't want URCM to be deleted. The moderation panel needs replacing.

You've seen more than enough ludicrous rejections of "outsiders'" posts, together with manual approval of attacks from "insiders" towards "outsiders", to know perfectly well that the bias is very real. You may be OK with that but I and others are not. It will be sorted out sooner or later, whether or not you try to abuse the process by creating irrelevant RFDs and thereby (you hope) stalling/ delaying/weakening any effort to correct the discrimination and "private club" aspects which are currently in place.