Nuxx:MPG.255a9e4666bbc9c989695@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: "Just zis Guy, you know?"  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Does Anyone Truly Think Chapman *Didn't* Post as Lou Knee? Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:09:12 -0000 Lines: 45 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.13 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091103-0, 03/11/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 66948c76.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=EoSlI6eVTETRGl[M\hVLXP0g@SS;SF6nWR9OH0:RnENTif50d?e;NTT`:ITG5aA:cWdWH4IMe__SQ X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 3850 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:740742

I mean apart from keitht, who is either *spectacularly* stupid, or very good at pretending to be spectacularly stupid (of course, he always makes out that it's the second one when he's caught out, but I have my doubts to say the least).

Does anyone genuinely think that Chapman didn't make the Lou Knee post where he called a poster a "piece of shit" (for daring to ask why some people hated motorists...Chapman doesn't like it when people talk about his car-hating)? I'd like to think that even Chapman's most pathetic, non-independent-minded sycophant would have realised by now that he made that Lou Knee post, even if they're too scared of the odious fat fiftysomething to say so, but judging by how hopelessly incapable some of the morons are of seeing anything but good in Chapman, I'm by no means certain. This thread will go some way towards determining just how much the rot has set in when it comes to Chapman's car-hating buddies (e.g. mile-"the law is the law, but only when it can be used against motorists, who I don't hate at all, honest"-burner) and their refusal to openly accept that their anti-motorist messiah is anything but perfect.

"Who cares?" = "I know Chapman made that post, and if one of my opponents had done it then I'd be making a fuss, but since my hero made it I'm going to downplay the importance." Besides, anyone who really wanted the issue to go away once and for all would tell Chapman to stop lying and admit to making the post. If it's so unimportant, why is he so reluctant to tell the truth about it? (Can't answer that? Oh dear.) Clearly he knows, along with his sucker-uppers, that that post puts him in a very bad light and shows him to be an utter hyporite on many levels. That he and his followers therefore try to dismiss the matter shows their arrogance and their eagerness to suppress any fact which makes things awkward for them (another fact that they regularly try to suppress is that speed cameras kill people: it gets in the way of their anti-motorist agenda, so they just pretend it isn't so, and insult and try to censor anyone who dares to tell it like it is).

Chapman and his grovellers would be a lot less despised if they just came clean about the Lou Knee post and stopped this nonsense. Surely Chapman realises that it's just this kind of thing that gets people's backs up so much: his point-blank refusal to admit to wrongdoing or take any blame no matter how obvious it is. Doing that isn't "tough", it just makes you look like an arrogant fuckwit who won't admit when he's beaten, and no-one does that better than Chapman. He should tell the truth about Lou Knee and then we can all move on.

Guy Chapman: Have you ever posted as Lou Knee?