Nuxx:5755edea-dc1f-4861-9087-87eab61b3837@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.sheds Subject: Re: What's this, then? Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 39 Message-ID: <5755edea-dc1f-4861-9087-87eab61b3837@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com> References:   <6ju6mvF52h9cU1@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.206.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222255049 6239 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2008 11:17:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.206.99; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3402 Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.rec.sheds:892232

On Sep 24, 7:56 am, "Cerumen"  wrote: > Nuxx Bar wrote: > > A load of garbage.

Care to be more specific? Oh no, you can't be, because you can't actually refute any of it. I can see why you're a friend of Crapman: you both have the same habit of writing off a post as "drivel" or similar when it contains true stuff that you don't like and can't counter. Do you think it makes you look clever?

If you were to bother to search on Google Groups, you'd quickly find that Crapman *has* called his opponents paedophiles despite having no evidence (the "logic" he used to come to such a conclusion is an excellent demonstration of the kind of bollocks "reasoning" that he saying it's "garbage", because you don't *want* it to be true. Exactly like Crapman saying that his anti-motorist measures don't kill people, simply because he wants it to be so. Isn't that what those suffering from psychosis do?  Persuade themselves that things are true just because they want them to be?
 * constantly* uses), *has* spouted the "false dilemma" rubbish, and
 * has* done all the other things I said. Yet you still insist on

Now I'm going to find an article which describes starvation in Third World countries, and post a comment at the bottom which says "A load of garbage". I don't *want* the article to be true, you see, but I can't refute any of it, so I'm just going to post a useless, generalised, one-line comment instead, and then pretend to myself that there's no starvation. Then I'll be as logical and clever as Saruman, who clearly thinks that by pretending that Crapman isn't a complete bastard, that will somehow be the case.

The search goes on for someone who 1) supports Crapman and 2) debates fairly and properly by actually acknowledging when something is true, however inconvenient it may be. Saruman, if (as I strongly suspect) you know that what I put about Crapman was true but you support him anyway, you are just a bad as he is, and you clearly don't have any more of a conscience than he does. Thousands of people dying and yet neither of you care. Unbelievable.