Nuxx:07bcbe2f-4f0b-49d9-a0bf-4f85a801e29f@q11g2000yqi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!q11g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <07bcbe2f-4f0b-49d9-a0bf-4f85a801e29f@q11g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.management Subject: Re: Moderated group voting procedure Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:58:36 -0700 (PDT) References:          <8kaZAIE7fvaKFwXE@[127.0.0.1]> Lines: 25 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.153.43.65 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1248598716 4079 127.0.0.1 (26 Jul 2009 08:58:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: q11g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.153.43.65; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2840 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:720346

On Jul 25, 1:18=A0pm, "Wm..."  wrote: > Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:34:45  > uk.net.news.config Ian Smith  > > >On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Wm...  wrote: > > >> =A0Nothing. =A0UKV doesn't put things in the way. > > >My ballot request was delayed by a greylisting system running on a > >mail relay mx0.ukvoting.org.uk. [62.197.40.218]. > > >At least, it got a 450 rejection with a human-readable message about > >greylisting and it went through on the second attempt about ten > >minutes later - that looks like a greylisting system to me, but maybe > >it doesn't to you. > > I have written to the VT about this. =A0Please don't think uk.* as a whol= e > expects you or anyone else to jump through silly hoops. =A0We like people > that vote and I am sure this will be sorted out soon.

Who the fuck is "we"? Why do you keep pretending that you hold some official administrative position related to usenet, when all you really do is talk shit and think you're much cleverer than you are?