Nuxx:4cc75753-b705-4790-a2ee-eca0b9cacda2@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <4cc75753-b705-4790-a2ee-eca0b9cacda2@n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:51:11 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <784aj1F1j3r9uU1@mid.individual.net> <57bbb322-a374-4d35-99bd-717a62887981@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>      Lines: 33 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243731071 24303 127.0.0.1 (31 May 2009 00:51:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 00:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n4g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3238 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:829650

On May 29, 7:05=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Fri, 29 May 2009 05:36:00 +0100, Phil W Lee > >  wrote: > >>What about when there have been objections to someone? > >When they are from known trolls, I'd consider them ringing > >endorsements. > > Let's say a person offers to act as moderator, and is opposed by one > or two individuals. =A0If the weight of the potential members of the new > group clearly supports their being a moderator, the one or two > dissenters will not prevail. > > In any case, who has offered to stand as moderator and been opposed? > How much of that opposition is from people whose behaviour here > indicates a very low probability of their being whitelisted in the > moderated group? =A0Most of this seems to be based on the fact that Nuxx > and judith apparently believe that I would want to be a moderator. > They are wrong.

But you've lied many times before to get what you want. The fact that you have been acting like some kind of pretend "moderator" for so long indicates that you do secretly want to be one, and it's likely that you're only pretending not to want to be one because you don't want to lose a vote (this way you can say "I would have been a good moderator, and people would have wanted me to be one, but I 'don't have time'").

Judith and I are just making absolutely sure that you're not going to be one...we both object to it in the strongest possible terms, far more than we object to anyone else moderating (except Spindrift, in my case at least, but no-one seriously thinks he's respectable, whereas for some very strange reason many seem to think that you are).