Nuxx:D50f8ad8-8f4c-4102-9a57-ba50cca31851@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling, uk.transport.london, uk.rec.driving Subject: Re: Bus Lanes: Proof Of What We All Knew Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:12:28 -0800 (PST) References: <3282357c-d7aa-4691-a331-97561dba1306@1g2000hsl.googlegroups.com> <07080703-b9e4-47b3-9763-99fc09a01d26@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>  <6ebb9f1b-ff6a-4077-be40-8ea6f937cb0a@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <13qgesmedsrin99@corp.supernews.com> <_bednUcezpraoDXaRVnyvwA@bt.com> <1902588f-168f-4a6c-97fe-ee0f0103fe8f@v46g2000hsv.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 54 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.211.165.120 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1202231548 22292 127.0.0.1 (5 Feb 2008 17:12:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.211.165.120; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4242 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:638747

On Feb 5, 2:48 pm, spindrift  wrote: > "I think it's pathetic that the most vocally and notoriously anti- > motorist/anti-motorcyclist poster on the whole Internet denies being > anything of the sort. " > > I am asking for evidence for this. > > I've asked seven times now.

And I've already said that you have declared support for many, many anti-motorist measures over the years (at least two of which have been mentioned in this thread), but I've never seen you oppose any. That is evidence enough, although there is plenty more, not least your ridiculous hatred of Paul Smith. No-one who genuinely advocated safe and pleasant cycling, and wasn't anti-motorist, would have such a pathological obsession with the man.

> If my views were as "anti-motorist" as you claim it strikes me a > strange that you can't actually find any examples....

As above. The Internet is littered with your posts supporting anti- motorist measures, and none (that I've seen) opposing them. Have you got it yet?

> "Can you name any anti-motorist > or anti-motorcyclist measures (which are not also intended to be > anti- > cyclist) which you oppose? " > > I'm asking you what these mythical "anti-motorist" measures are.

So that'll be a "no" then. Anyone who thinks that this government isn't even slightly anti-car, and therefore hasn't implemented or expanded any anti-car measures, is potty. I don't think even you're that deluded. I've already given examples of anti-motorist measures, and there are plenty more which are well known. You know perfectly well what they all are, as you frequently scour and quote from sites which discuss them, and you automatically support them exactly because they're anti-motorist.

Presumably you're reluctant to admit that anti-motorist measures exist because then you'd also be forced to admit that you happen to support every single one of them. But you see you might as well, because everyone knows it anyway. Go on, have some backbone.

> Perhaps you missed my question, what on earth made you think any of > the Telegraph quotes are mine please?

I don't remember saying that, certainly not in this thread, but you are renowned for posting your invective pretty much everywhere that you possibly can, and that includes the comments sections of relevant articles. You must have used literally hundreds of different aliases over the years. Why did you use "yggems" to post on YouTube, by the way?