Nuxx:074ad0c7-e7c4-4a3e-84cd-46090f4e5ece@o20g2000yqk.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!o20g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <074ad0c7-e7c4-4a3e-84cd-46090f4e5ece@o20g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:10:17 -0700 (PDT) References:  <166804253321545262.511456%steve%-malloc.co.uk@news.individual.net> <38eq48x9b4.ln2@news.ducksburg.com> <02059306-f632-4ff7-9f3e-949162648f6e@w6g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <1812ba7d-977b-4ebf-b850-6bef533bd0b1@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 59 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300353017 32256 127.0.0.1 (17 Mar 2011 09:10:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o20g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4882 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38968

On Mar 16, 8:49=A0pm, "Wm..."  wrote: > Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:07:13 > <1812ba7d-977b-4ebf-b850-6bef533bd...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> > uk.net.news.moderation Nuxx Bar  > > > >I repeat, what is wrong with the posts I have made to URCM? =A0Does it > >actually matter what you think my motives are as long as I post on- > >topic on and in line with the charter? =A0As for URC, yes I do post > >stuff about motoring there sometimes, but thereagain, so do you. =A0As > >I've said before, URC is the UK place on Usenet with the most anti- > >motorist posters, and sometimes it's interesting to find out what they > >think about something (or sometimes, yes, expose their > >irrationality). =A0There's also the fact that most topics which are > >relevant to motoring are somewhat relevant to cycling by default, > >since the two transport modes share roads (and are surely more > >relevant if motoring is as terribly dangerous to cyclists as is made > >out by some posters). > > >I don't have a problem with the vast majority of cyclists. > > please don't use my .sig

What the hell is that supposed to mean? I've just about had it with your utter bullshit. I don't think you'll really care about this, but I'll point it out anyway: I read posts from absolutely everyone, even the most reprehensible, lying, lowlife psycholist wankers, with the sole exception of "N Ron Hubbard", whose secretions are simply not worth wasting time with in any way, shape or form, even on an "unintentionally amusing" level, or a "seeing what the enemy is up to now" level (since he is not a remotely important member of "the enemy", being a persona specifically constructed to make tired and predictable replies to Judith and me, and he obviously realises how unfunny and worthless his posts are, and what a bad light they put him in, as otherwise he'd post them under his usual username).

But I'm about a millimetre away from not bothering with your posts either (I realise how Jackson-like that sounds, but thereagain it's the first time I've said it, whereas we get it from him every 5 minutes). It's not because you're particularly offensive, it's because you're plain weird, and you say too much stuff which doesn't make a lick of sense, apparently with the sole intention of irritating people by making them think "WTF?" I don't know what your problem is but I've just about had enough of repeatedly trying to decipher your indecipherable "points". (That's leaving aside your creepy preoccupation with people's children, and this business with apparently trying to track Judith down.)

Too often, your posts make little to no sense (and not just to me). Then when they do make sense they frequently contain disinformation, e.g. "Chapman has told me whether he posted as Lou Knee" / "I don't know if he posted as Lou Knee" / "I know he didn't post as Lou Knee" / etc / etc. It's the sort of thing an attention-seeking kid would do. I don't expect you to care but if that kind of nonsense doesn't stop soon then I'll stop reading your posts (without a Jackson/Chapman- style "Look, I'm so big, *plonk*" announcement), so if you get no further replies from me then you'll know why. I don't mean to be unpleasant but I'm afraid the above is how I feel. It's up to you whether you take any notice.