Nuxx:469352d1-f343-4e04-81b5-454dc5fcc4b3@f33g2000vbm.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f33g2000vbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <469352d1-f343-4e04-81b5-454dc5fcc4b3@f33g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 07:49:11 -0700 (PDT) References: <3rov45dq3mn0rd03bb4ld757vce94jv7r6@4ax.com>  <5l4955lddkarjsst2seckdi3u5lcmmg357@news.markshouse.net>   <1dle55hrnrmhsqv2aakf54ebepqo5vkgld@4ax.com>    <20090712132524.3bd9e733@bluemoon> Lines: 23 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247410152 27686 127.0.0.1 (12 Jul 2009 14:49:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f33g2000vbm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2615 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:56030 uk.rec.cycling:7130

On Jul 12, 1:25=A0pm, Rob Morley  wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:58:08 -0700 (PDT) > "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 10:02=A0am, "Wm..."  > > wrote: > > > > do you think it will provide a valid address come vote time? > > > Yes. =A0The question is only how many. > > Surely it's already disqualified itself by soliciting 'no' votes?

No-one has solicited "No" votes. Some people have notified those in other newsgroups, but just because most people in those newsgroups are likely to vote "No" (as you'd expect since the proposal is for a censored group run by lunatic car-haters, and the newsgroups concerned are mostly occupied by those who oppose car-haters), that does not constitute soliciting "No" votes.

And this "it" nonsense is incredibly immature. Would you call someone "it" to their face? If not, you shouldn't be doing it on usenet either.