Nuxx:MPG.271045c77dd0f7d4989810@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM - my "mission" - eureka moment! Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:24:27 +0100 References:  <6f4645a3abbc357620edb1f11367f81f@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <26rba6d5rbtbb80gd3vel7dmtdr4vlol79@4ax.com> Lines: 90 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 001de2fa.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=^7Vk55<@mnL@iVTTMB, jmsmith2010 @live.co.uk says... > > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:23:18 +0200, N Ron Hubbard  > wrote: > > >Catherine Byrne  wrote: > > > >> In article , > >> ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk says... > >> > > >> > In article , > >> > Just zis Guy, you know?  wrote: > >> > >I have the solution: all you have to do is stop with the pro-motorist > >> > >libertarian mission. [...] > >> > > >> > I'd just like to nip in the bud any suggestion that the moderators' > >> > view of Matt's mission is related to which side of the argument he's > >> > posting on. If Matt suddenly started posting exactly the opposite > >> > views to those he's currently espousing, we'd treat it just the same. > >> > >> You're a lying cunt, aren't you? > > > >You're Nuxxy, aren't you? > > > You're Porky Chapman from an anonymizer aren't you?

The saddest thing is that as soon as I saw that Mother had replied, I predicted what he was going to say, word for word. He's like a parody of a psycholist: he always says the most obvious fuckwitted thing, like he's permanently answering the question "What would be the most pointless, tedious, banal, predictable and (of course) dishonest post that a psycholist could make at this moment?"

He obviously knows he's being a dick, and that he can't win the argument, otherwise he would just post under his usual account. He is exactly the kind of less than honest person who you would expect to be in favour of speed cameras, and I think he's another of the supporting- cameras-because-he-hates-cars bunch (if he really is Chapman then that goes without saying of course). He has certainly been caught out multiple times pretending not to understand what his opponent's saying in order to dodge their points, and that's one of the hallmarks of a camera-supporting psycholist.

I could almost believe that he really is a parody of a psycholist, since he continually posts crap which is so self-evidently wrong and underhand. I don't think he is though, as he only usually posts to reply to you or me. The fact that he feels the need to use a special account just to do that does point towards it being Chapman, or some other idiot who is lying (surprise surprise) when they claim to think there's no point in replying to us...it's almost like they don't really believe that the stuff we post "doesn't need correcting because it's so obviously wrong"...it's almost like they know perfectly well that we're right, and the only way they can think of to counter our arguments is by making "smart" remarks, obfuscating, erecting straw men and basically doing any dishonest thing they can think of to try to distract from the fact that we're right.

As ever, the question has to be why they insist on arguing with us rather than just admitting that we're correct. And as ever, the answer is that they can't accept reality when it's not what they want it to be. People like "N Ron Hubbard" will go to their graves still desperately telling themselves that cameras save lives, helmets don't save lives, and all these other ridiculous examples of wishful thinking which show that they have a determination not to accept things for what they are, and to give anyone who tells it how it is a hard time. Pathetic denial, and jealousy at those who aren't so constrained.

For the first time in my life I'm going to start using a killfile, and N Ron Hubbard (and his socks) will be the only person in it, because his posts are more worthless, predictable and devoid of originality, imagination or (unintentional) humour than *anyone* else's by far. There's nothing remotely interesting about him, and he has no real personality of his own; he's just a composite of the most fuckwitted comments from other psycholists. I don't see anyone else who currently posts ever qualifying for my killfile, just Mother. (Sorry, I know it's a bit Wacko-like boasting about who I'm killfiling, but thereagain, having one particularly halfwitted individual in it is a far cry from Jackson's "disagree with me once and into the killfile you go" policy.)

Sigh. These psycholists are a depressing bunch...constantly and aggressively refusing to accept reality takes its toll and makes them thoroughly unpleasant I think. I can't even begin to fathom the mindset which leads to decisions such as "Oh dear, I don't like that that's the case, so I'll just have to pretend that it isn't, and try to force everyone else to do so as well". It's bizarre to the point of lunacy. If you can't accept life for what it is then you might as well start fantasising constantly or just top yourself. It's hard to imagine that anyone would really miss N Ron Hubbard if he did the latter.