Nuxx:4e27257a$0$2937$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <4e27257a$0$2937$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: London sees more low emission cars and welcomes more Super Highways. Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:59:05 +0100 References:  <4e258a6e$0$2496$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>  <5gtVp.62106$5v5.23985@newsfe11.iad> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5gtVp.62106$5v5.23985@newsfe11.iad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 284be6b9.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=@Z8C5HbT:g^d]c;>LNFRcSYjZGX^207P[`l5a4fId]IFYk > Besides, many motorists ignore cycle lanes anyway and use them to park in > while they go shopping. They just don't care about obstructing vulnerable > cyclists and placing them in danger.

Good, so you'd rather not have cycle lanes?

And BTW, could you please explain exactly how a stationary vehicle could possibly put a cyclist in any danger? Surely if the cyclist is able to stop in a distance that they can see to be clear, and they're observing and signalling properly, then there should be no problem.