Nuxx:5b6f43b8-78a0-4db4-b922-22b7ae73d235@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <5b6f43b8-78a0-4db4-b922-22b7ae73d235@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:24:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <78a47hF1l5f9aU1@mid.individual.net> <9ae7293d-6d88-441f-b97 <9171e4f3-3f77-4a2c-9297-b2f678520bca@s21g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <5Ob*caaIs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <479fc0bd-b956-4940-b212-f13e4bd7f750@c9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243729444 19442 127.0.0.1 (31 May 2009 00:24:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 00:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2577 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:705669

On May 29, 11:17=A0pm, James  wrote: > On May 30, 12:32=A0am, David Damerell  > wrote: > > > Quoting =A0spindrift =A0: > > > >On May 29, 3:20=3DA0pm, Matt B  wrote: > > >>No. Those being bullied are those who wish to continue to interact wi= th > > >>the alleged "troll", believing it to be a false accusation. > > >Can yo name someone who doesn't think you're a troll? > > > I think Matt B's a lunatic kook. > > I don't think he is that bad, but he is repetitive, boring, > repetitive, boring, repetitive, and boring. > > And repetitive. > > And boring.

Actually, he only tends to correct the nonsense about "speeding" when that nonsense is spouted in the first place. So surely those who claim that "speeding is dangerous" are repetitive and boring as well if Matt B is? Oh no, sorry, silly me: their views are "correct", so they're allowed to repeat them as often as they like.

As always on URC, it comes down solely to who has the "right" point of view. Everything else is just excuses based on that.