Nuxx:3fab181f-694e-4f64-9497-467ee2d0658a@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3fab181f-694e-4f64-9497-467ee2d0658a@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Earn_=A350_In_Under_A_Minute?= Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:58:06 -0700 (PDT) References: <4b69965c-8145-4096-b9bf-b5c23090c233@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 54 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.206.99 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222297087 9560 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2008 22:58:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 22:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.206.99; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3872 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:669037

On Sep 24, 7:06=A0am, Tom Crispin  wrote: > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar > > > >  wrote: > >I will send =A350 to the first regular pro-camera poster on here who: > > >- admits to being anti-motorist; > >- admits that they are attracted to speed cameras solely or mostly > >because of their anti-motorist stance, and that is more important to > >them than whether or not speed cameras save lives; > >- promises to look properly at the facts and figures to find out > >whether speed cameras actually save lives, and if they don't, stop > >supporting them, in recognition of the fact that saving the lives of > >road users is infinitely important than silly, small-minded prejudices > >against people who use the "wrong" modes of transport; > >- admits that they think that the sick Chapman is anti-motorist, and > >that his whole road "safety" campaign is driven exclusively by that > >rather than any genuine wish to save lives. > > >Easy money, if you'll only be honest for a minute. =A0Can any of the > >trolls stop lying for that amount of time, or is it beyond them, even > >for =A33000/hour? =A0We shall see. > > I admit to it all.

Admit it all explicitly, and in your own words, so that readers actually believe that you mean it, and that you're not just being a trolling fuckwit who thinks he's much cleverer than he is, as per. Why have you denied those things up to now? Is =A350 all it takes for you to admit what a motorist-hating scumbag you are? If it's so easy to make you admit it, why have you been so hellbent on denying it until now?

You also need to promise that you're going to look properly at the facts and figures to find out whether speed cameras really save lives, as it says quite clearly (and, of course, implicit in such a promise is an admission that you haven't so far looked properly at the facts and figures, instead choosing to assume that cameras work, because it suits you and your anti-motorist outlook).

> How are you going to get the cash to me?

I'm not even going to think about that until the above is accomplished. You really think I'm going to send =A350 to someone who simply types five insincere-looking words, especially when they have a track record of posting replies to my messages which don't further the discussion in any way and are designed simply to distract from the awkward truths contained in my anti-camera, anti-anti-motorist posts?

By the way, this is a time-limited offer. It'll end sometime in the next week.