Nuxx:A2b07d2e-7c21-42d7-968a-7cabee059152@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:43:43 -0700 (PDT) References: <9ICdnZOJPYS_8x7QnZ2dnUVZ8jSdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>  <1jyjfg2.r58e6kbzxu8cN%%steve%@m <685ac197-dc53-4d39-a336-a36b046813b4@k9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 28 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301586223 19222 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2011 15:43:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:43:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2410 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:39734

On Mar 25, 1:37=A0am, Cris Galletly  wrote: > In article <685ac197-dc53-4d39-a336-a36b04681...@k9g2000yqi.googlegroups.= com>, > Nuxx Bar =A0 wrote: > > >Oh thanks! :-( > > I don't understand (sometimes) your motivations,

A lot of people say that...I'm not sure myself half the time....

> but I don't think you're off your rocker.

Thanks for that (I think!) And from a chiark user as well! Perhaps not for much longer if you carry on talking like that...just a hunch but I'm not sure Ian Jackson shares your views.... ;-)

> Half the time you make far too much sense :-/

I think I understand what you mean by that...the things I say about (say) URCM "moderation" make sense, but you wish they didn't, i.e. you wish URCM "moderation" was better. I'm glad you said the above instead of shooting the messenger, which unfortunately is the approach of some round here.

(Sorry to take so long to reply...I seem to have missed some of the posts in this megathread....)