Nuxx:40eb2edf-ece9-44aa-9575-450c45214cff@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <40eb2edf-ece9-44aa-9575-450c45214cff@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: psycholist wearing a spur Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 06:02:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <2fecbdc4fef2c3a9e0d54235d33ed720@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>    Lines: 26 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244293324 24811 127.0.0.1 (6 Jun 2009 13:02:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2319 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:707956

On Jun 6, 11:23=A0am, satur...@no.thanks wrote: > On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 09:47:01 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?" > >  wrote: > >On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:26:02 +0100, Jerry J  wrote: > > >>Judy dear, some of your argument on here is fascinating, indeed, > >>refreshing. But this sort of comment reveals your true colours ie. that > >>of a troll, at best, or simply a total idiot. > > >It's a forgery. > > > > >I don't know who forged it but they are wasting their time - you > >simply cannot make judith's reputation any worse than it already is. > > >Guy > > Why do you persist in baiting judith and then moaning when she > responds?

You have to wonder. He seems to think that just because he doesn't respond directly to the "trolls", instead responding to replies to them, the "regulars" won't get annoyed with him for "troll-feeding". As usual, he's wrong.