Nuxx:0f937956-d468-4c7a-9387-0e175121894c@k30g2000yqf.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k30g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <0f937956-d468-4c7a-9387-0e175121894c@k30g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Moderation v's McCarthyism was: Re: Censorship in 	uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:13:41 -0700 (PDT) References:   <595379ce-13f5-4b   Lines: 30 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247768022 19319 127.0.0.1 (16 Jul 2009 18:13:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:13:42 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k30g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2766 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:717937

On Jul 16, 2:01=A0pm, David Damerell  wrote: > Quoting =A0Keitht =A0: > > >Nuxx Bar wrote: > [froth] > >Therefore it is also raising possibility that you are the faker and just > > =A0farting in the bath. > > _Raising_ it? Nuxxy uses BT Internet, same as the forger. Nully's a Virgi= n > punter. Judith has a rather distinctive style. Of course it's bloody Nuxx= y.

But since the posts in question are anti-motorist rants, why is there any confusion? Why is there any problem? If the posts so obviously aren't from Chapman, no-one's going to fall for them, are they?

Except plenty of people *have* fallen for them. Plenty didn't so much as bat an eyelid when they saw car-hating shit coming from Chapman (or so they thought). That is so telling, and doesn't Chapman know it.

It's time for him to stop denying that he hates motorists (other than himself). It's getting ridiculous now that he *still* pretends otherwise in the face of such overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Hopefully this will be the final nail in the coffin of his failed "If I lie about hating motorists then I might be able to get anti-motorist measures put in place more easily" strategy. He tried it, he failed miserably, and it's time for him to publicly accept that, in spite of his horrific arrogance.