Nuxx:7c362a7f-c68b-4bd8-8575-adb95d8f1dd3@ed10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!ed10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <7c362a7f-c68b-4bd8-8575-adb95d8f1dd3@ed10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Moderated cycling group : posts rejected Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 03:47:57 -0700 (PDT) References:      Lines: 36 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1302086877 31049 127.0.0.1 (6 Apr 2011 10:47:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 10:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: ed10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3136 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:40402

On Apr 6, 11:26=A0am, Ian Jackson  wrote: > In article , > Ian Smith =A0 wrote: > > >On Tue, 05 Apr 2011, Tom Crispin  wrote: > >>I thought that it was explicitly stated during the RFD that posting > >>history in other groups would not count for anything. > > No, it was explicitly stated that _prior history_ would be > disregarded. =A0Ie, that the trolls would get a fresh start in urcm. > And that is what happened.

The outright lies keep on coming. Matt B, Judith and I were blatantly treated differently from the very start, both in terms of rejecting our posts, and in terms of approving jibes against us by people like Chapman. Why do you persist in pretending otherwise when no-one believes it? It was obviously a deliberate policy, so why not have to guts to admit it? Afraid that your little empire will be taken away from you? Well I've got news for you, it's going to happen anyway, so you might as well start being honest and salvage a bit of respect.

> >Yes, but that has been proven to be an outright lie over and again. > > We have definitely taken postings made by the same poster in other > groups into account. =A0It would be daft not to.

Where do you draw the line? Do you take postings to *all* other newsgroups into account, or just the ones you happen to read anyway? Why not take postings to web forums into account as well? (Maybe you do...was it you who said "I=92ve researched this poster on Google and they are provocative", as referenced by Peter Fox on http://www.vulpeculox.= net/omnilog/ ?)

More hard questions which will almost certainly go unanswered.