Nuxx:WWpil.12514$Ci3.10437@newsfe17.ams2

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe17.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Tory MP in 4x4 fined for 'momentary lapse of concentration' Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:56:04 +0000 References:           Lines: 27 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To:  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.21.204.127 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe17.ams2 1233791772 82.21.204.127 (Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:56:12 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:56:12 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 2823 X-Original-Bytes: 2780 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:685074

Marc wrote: > Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: >> On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:23:23 +0000, Marc >>  said in >> : >> >>> It's always worth pointing out that the judith is wrong, there maybe >>> someone reading the thread that hasn't met it yet, and they may think >>> that it has a (any) point. >> >> Up to a point, Lord Copper. The usual result is that it becomes >> incandescent with rage at the "fuckwits" who dare to contradict its >> cherished illusions, and goes into Overtroll again. And I speak as >> one who has been at fault in this regard many times. > > That's the advantage of the random nature of the kill command, I'm not > tempted to take the piss out of every one of it's posts and I can choose > if I want to take the piss ( or not) when it does float to the top of > the bowl. If it replies then it's left hanging on the end of the thread > ( much like a klingon)with it obvious to everyone that it's being > ignored, if it doesn't reply it looks as if it has run away. In either > case it never knows if I have read it's reply or not. Eventually it > might even tire of being taken the piss out of, without ever having a > chance to hit back.

Have you always been an odious twat, or is it only behind the safety of your monitor?