Nuxx:F2cbf3b4-c916-4650-b4a1-57ae759d38b9@k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:51:09 -0700 (PDT) References: <4TbiRNOEXoTKNAMn@gauva.familyfrench.co.uk> <1e69c9f0-a502-4202-a873-a7d584b8dfcb@i6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>   <1634551jo9s752k0dodmir3h0di5rk4mer@4ax.com>  <9730617c-7298-4f8a-aabb-710e2391b7db@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>   <9m5c55tir3fe55561fme52spm225bn1kp0@4ax.com> Lines: 20 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247165470 627 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2009 18:51:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k19g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2587 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:55824 uk.rec.cycling:6970

On Jul 9, 5:12=A0pm, jms  wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:43:46 -0700 (PDT), RudiL  > wrote: > > >On 9 July, 16:22, jms  wrote: > > >> No-one is arguing to be able to put > >> "racist/sexist/homophobic/offensive rant" =A0in their sig > > >Yes but some are arguing sigs should not be subject to moderation. > > Who - where?

Besides, even if they weren't subject to moderation, they'd still be unacceptable, in the same way that racism/sexism/homophobia would be unacceptable on here, and probably complained about to providers (and rightly so, unlike the frivolous and pathetic complaints made to providers by idiots who don't want to read certain people's opinions and are desperately trying to censor them). So as usual, RudeBoi is well wide of the mark.