Nuxx:93f6f26e-78cc-4d25-85e8-308f340b488a@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <93f6f26e-78cc-4d25-85e8-308f340b488a@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: TOM CRISPIN Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:20:27 -0700 (PDT) References: <51af6c0d-e815-41f5-ac51-227c8afaf1d9@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 59 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244406027 9568 127.0.0.1 (7 Jun 2009 20:20:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 20:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4160 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:708264

On Jun 6, 10:58 pm, Judith M Smith  wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:04:53 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar > >  wrote: > >So, what is this "joke" then? You seem to have taken an awfully long > >time to explain it. When are you finally going to do so? If I didn't > >know better, I would think there was actually no joke, and you'd > >idiotically taken Chapman's word for it when he lied to you. > > >Will you now admit that there is no "joke", and even you now realise > >that Chapman was the one who posted the first (and possibly some of > >the subsequent) "Lou Knee" post(s)? Have you learnt from this, or > >will you unquestioningly believe Chapman again next time he lies to > >you? Sadly, I know the answer. > > >Come on, Tom Crispin: it's time to come clean please. Surely even > >your beloved Chapman, King of Motorist-Haters, isn't worth you > >sullying your reputation further just to protect him. > > Did you notice that I accused Chapman of making a post today which was > a forgery - appearing to have been made by me. > > Quick as a flash he was stating quite clearly - > > "Forgery yes, by me, absolutely not. Just to be clear here." > > Now I do believe him - however - I find it really strange  that he > was so quick to deny that was him - but still hasn't denied that he > made the Lou Knee post. > > How can that be?

Very revealing, isn't it? In fact, it would have been rather clever of you if you had in fact made the OP of that thread from a friend's Internet connection, with the aim of getting the above to happen, just to make it even more obvious that Chapman posted as Lou Knee. If it was in fact you (and I'm not saying it was by any means), it certainly worked, and anything which makes Chapman look even more of an idiot than he already does has got to be a good thing. And no-one could possibly accuse you of forgery or anything else when you posted under your own name! ;-)

> (The reason I believe him is that the fuckwit Taylor is back - he's > always present when there are forgeries about)

Hmm. Scumbags like him are inevitably hypocrites, so that stands to reason. I wouldn't be surprised if he was "Nomen Nescio" actually. And incidentally, if that utter pleb posts any more complaints about me saying things that plenty of others also do, then I will start making complaints to providers about those plenty of others, starting with Chapman.

That will probably cover whoever Nomen Nescio (the anonymous coward) is somewhere along the way, but even if not, I'm sure he/she (almost certainly a he) wouldn't like that to happen, since he/she hadn't complained about them already (i.e. he/she was obviously just complaining about you and me because they wanted to censor our opinions, and not because they had any particular problem with the "abuse" that we had supposedly posted).