Nuxx:310923a8-1d49-45cf-91f5-cdf3825da3e2@l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <310923a8-1d49-45cf-91f5-cdf3825da3e2@l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: FAO Chapman Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 03:01:40 -0700 (PDT) References: <8ah7e4hput43708g430l9cl62c3bc4phks@4ax.com>  Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.146.155 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1222941700 17497 127.0.0.1 (2 Oct 2008 10:01:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l76g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.146.155; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.2) Gecko/2008091620 Firefox/3.0.2,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2565 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:670008

On Oct 2, 7:58=A0am, Ian Smith  wrote: > On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Guy Cuthbertson  wrote: > > =A0So how about it? =A0At the very least, it would be good if you could > > =A0reply politely. =A0But I'm not holding my breath. =A0(By the way, ma= y I > > =A0just remind you that you started the battle of insults between us > > =A0by calling me a "troll" when I wasn't trolling? > > So, a person who has never posted to usenet before (at least, I can > find no trace of any such) starts their record by begging not to be > considered a troll because 'he started it'? > > Can you explain this? > > The problem is, nym-shifting is one of teh key indicators of being a > troll, and you've more-or-less started your usenet career with a > confession of nym-shifting. =A0Not a good way to demonstrate that you're > not a troll. > > I suggest you throw this account away, and try again.

Crapman, along with many here, has a policy of KFing all anti-camera posters. Something to do with not being able to win debates with them. Therefore, if I was going to post something that I wanted him to read, there wasn't much point in doing it as me, was there?

And can you honestly say that you've never seen "indicators of being a troll" in any of Chapman's posts? Honestly? I challenge you to say otherwise.