Nuxx:C6c62d47-8b79-48f8-8e88-5ff0dd3d2ac6@a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM is now working pretty well on the whole Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:02:16 -0800 (PST) References: <1jx7bxi.prxj5027n83rN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>   <1jx8kch.8kp6n419un11cN%NEWS@sarlet.com>  <1jx9aup.1u0v49i1ugq448N%NEWS@sarlet.com>  <1jxnyxo.17m56ka6tclihN%NEWS@sarlet.com>  <1jxojd8.4zlctn1t95n8eN%NEWS@sarlet.com>  <1jxon4s.1n8dsr7wk1pfN%NEWS@sarlet.com>  <1jxopdt.jf61vz1sfpy19N%NEWS@sarlet.com> <1d6dnX0r0sq2ae_QnZ2dnUVZ8vidnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <1jxpdkv.oun73jveun3fN%NEWS@sarlet.com>  <1jxr0e3.vsnwh81taygqlN%NEWS@sarlet.com> Lines: 10 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299495736 17280 127.0.0.1 (7 Mar 2011 11:02:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a28g2000vbo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2467 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38545

On Mar 7, 8:41=A0am, N...@sarlet.com (Roger Merriman) wrote: > > when you have stuff such as the 'straw poll' thats hardly suprising now > is it?

It would be interesting to hear whether Clive supported the idea of the straw poll. It would also be interesting to hear how he voted. I'm hoping he wasn't one of the "Magnificent Seven" who voted that the much more reasonable "moderation" policy regarding Matt B was too lax, but sadly I think he might have been.