Nuxx:Dd61c2db-515d-4c07-88ad-3385a8a14b96@p11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!p11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Address needed before posting Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:13:23 -0800 (PST) References:    <1jwzqeb.hwcyez6jleb1N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>  <8scqpqFhamU1@mid.individual.net> <317f5c94-acda-4040-aad5-557ac1a0851b@n18g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> <8sen70F989U1@mid.individual.net> <8fc6a93d-647b-42bf-be59-d2fc05035ec8@u23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>   Lines: 30 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298315603 1162 127.0.0.1 (21 Feb 2011 19:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p11g2000vbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2725 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:37747

On Feb 21, 6:08=A0pm, Percy Picacity  wrote: > Judith  wrote innews:jqq4m61cggvm2evjh7p2952dt= odpl42hqs@4ax.com: > > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 01:13:47 -0800 (PST), Trollsworth LeTrole > > wrote: > > > > > >>You can reduce it down to those terms, as if it's something done > >>at the drop of a hat, but it's not. Based on the figure of one(1) > >>ban, it looks like there's a fairly high bar indeed. > > > You are I assume aware that there has been no full explanation of > > why I was actually banned. =A0Other than Wacko's dodgy counting. > > > I have previously quoted =A0the posts which were rejected =A0- in > > order that people could say what was wrong with them; no-one did. > > > Wacko and Brooke =A0did not want me to post in the group - they > > contrived a reason which they thought would stop me. > > Do we know that only one person has been banned?

No, I have been banned as well. But accuracy was never TlT's strong point.