Nuxx:MPG.26f9a565d19b88ac9897ea@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Nominations invited for new moderators Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:30:13 +0100 References: <8f2hl4Ft9jU1@mid.individual.net>       <5EsBxIMSAojMFwU8@[127.0.0.1]>  Lines: 34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 9d2bcbf5.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=:TOJm2VOB05G>2Zgg858V:0g@SS;SF6n7RiiCXJE[K>7GH5=mE\dXm6`:ITG5aA:c7KOb7_FnYR93 X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 3059 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:33320

In article , guy.chapman@spamcop.net says... > > Also, I have no need to prove to anyone that crank calls were made, > the times and dates are recorded and the source (a phone box in > Binfield Heath, for example) is also on record.

I honestly and truly don't believe that I've ever even been to Binfield Heath, let alone made any "crank calls" from there. I note that according to Streetmap, there isn't even a phone box there. But if you really did get such a call then it was someone else. With the number of people that you've pissed off on the Internet over the years, and whole forum threads (that I haven't participated in) discussing your personal details and how best to "use" them, why oh why are you so keen to discount the possibility that someone else could be making the calls?

I don't give a stuff about you of course, but for the sake of your wife and kids, you should take steps to nail this actual real-life stalker, and the first step is to accept that it's not me. In actual fact I think you know that (hence your continued unprovoked rolling-in-shit remarks about me), it just suits you to play the victim when trying to get sympathy.

> People can believe > that or not. My identity is not a secret, neither Nuxx nor JMS will > own up to who they are. I think that is an important distinction.

Same old. There are posters on all "sides" who don't reveal their identities. I've explained why I don't: because people like Spindrift (remember him?) have a track record of harassing anti-camera posters offline. If someone is such a crazed car-hater that they support cameras in the knowledge that they kill people, I don't want them knowing who I am. If you won't accept that then so be it, but it seems perfectly rational to me.