Nuxx:MPG.26b00276565f5a9f9897ca@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!shaftesbury.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chapman's Blinkered Fan Club  Newsgroups: uk.rec.sheds Subject: Re: Amazing Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:59:38 +0100 Message-ID:  References:     <4c443096$0$7801$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100720-0, 20/07/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 73 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: d0390e73.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=\BgKeR?9K;LUiFIBU4@J_Hnok4Z\;F X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk Bytes: 5169 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.rec.sheds:999908

In article <4c443096$0$7801$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>, news@dentrassi- nospamformetodayplease.lodge.org.uk says... > > Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: > > > > Funny how all these one-off drive-by trolls share the same ISP as the Guy > > Cuthbertson / Nuxx Bar individual, isn't it? > > > > Having been reading some of the Gillian McPoo stuff again in the last > week, I was struck by how so many of the accusations flung by her and > her woo-merchant ilk are about precisely the behaviour they are > themselves displaying -put me in mind of a budging squawking and pecking > at its reflection in a mirror.

Except that you are either unaware of, or choose to ignore, critical details, as is so often the case with Chapman's apologists. Just in case you're actually interested in the truth rather than mere wishful thinking, "her woo-merchant ilk" keep mentioning Chapman's Lou Knee post not because of the post itself per se, but because of the following:

- Chapman's deceit once he was caught out. He did his best to *imply* that it wasn't him (pouring scorn on his accusers in the process) without actually saying so, but he has refused point blank to answer the question "Did you post as Lou Knee?" In other words, he made the post, but he's too proud to admit it. However he can't lie because of "God", so he just tries to deceive without lying instead (apparently God's OK with that). This epitomises Chapman in so many ways: his deceit, his absolute refusal to ever admit that he's wrong about anything, his cynicism and contempt for others, his stubbornness, etc.

- He said he had killfiled the person who he made the Lou Knee post in response to. Clearly he had done no such thing. Deceit again.

- It was so bloody hypocritical of him: getting on his high horse repeatedly about nym-shifting this, trolling that, making out that he was such a righteous good Christian while his opponents were lying barbarians who were beneath him in every way. Yet he is as dishonest as anyone. He will try every dirty trick in the book to get out of "losing".

- It was yet another example of him stirring/wallowing in shit/"troll- wrestling"/whatever you want to call it. When he acts hard done by, like he's been so picked on by those horrible bullies and he's done his best to avoid it, he conveniently forgets about posts like the Lou Knee ones. His pathetic apologists conveniently forget that as well, of course.

I genuinely don't think some of you Chapman-lovers realise just what a shit he really is. It's no accident that there are people who have it in for him, in particular, all over the Internet. You should wait until you get into a debate with him where you *know* that you are correct, and he also knows (or realises) that you are correct. He will try anything and everything to avoid conceding. He is utterly infuriating. There are *no* examples of JMS or Chapman's other critics being *so* determined to never admit any kind of fault. JMS and pretty much anyone else who had made that Lou Knee post would have long since admitted it. Why hasn't Chapman? If it's "so unimportant" then why is he so reluctant to tell the truth about it? It would be far, far easier for him in the long run if he fessed up, but he won't, and I know that you know that that's not reasonable behaviour, and demonstrates very bad things about Chapman.

No doubt you'll show what a big man you are by saying "I didn't read that", "Plonk", not replying at all or something equally big and tough, but really you're just proving my point that Chapman's fan club simply aren't interested in their idol being criticised, however accurate that criticism is. There's no "Generally I support Chapman but he's been a twat about not admitting to posting as Lou Knee", it's just 100% "Chapman can do no wrong, end of story, and anyone who says otherwise is a 'troll'". It's very sad.