Nuxx:155804ad-f368-45f5-8bae-81d302fc34e4@m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <155804ad-f368-45f5-8bae-81d302fc34e4@m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: URCM is now dead Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:05:52 -0800 (PST) References:   <20110224135120.715c9f6c@bluemoon>   <1jx7mqv.930q4115d14d1N%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>    <0d1cc6d6-037f-4d44-b17b-ec40686707ec@w36g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <1jx94xr.18odck8bk935wN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> <4804b5ba-c504-4b89-9508-4a385565050d@k18g2000vbq.googlegroups.com> Lines: 34 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298653552 23902 127.0.0.1 (25 Feb 2011 17:05:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 17:05:52 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m7g2000vbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5.8; U; en) Presto/2.7.62 Version/11.01,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3581 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:37977

On Feb 25, 4:32=A0pm, Simon Mason  wrote: > > Dunno, but IME, those posters who continually hack off fellow posters > by deliberate obfuscation and intended provocation

What I find incredible is that you apparently can't see that Chapman does those exact same things as much as anyone. You seem to see him very much as a victim. Do you hold him at all responsible for what happened on URC?

> Some would love to start all over again with urcm and the lengths they > will go to as judged by the activity here, shows what would happen if > they were let into urcm. It would just end up like urc is now. So > those people who think that the mods are being heavy handed should > take a trip to urc and see what urcm would be like.

Sorry for never following this up with you properly in the other thread, but I'm still not really clear who you're talking about other than Judith. You've said you're not talking about me. As far as I know, Judith and I are the only people who are banned (and for the record I don't particularly care about getting back in). Do you know for a fact that other people are also banned and it just hasn't been made public? Or are you just guessing at that? Perhaps there are people you think of as "trolls" on URC who you've seen state that they won't even attempt to post on URCM as things stand, I don't know.

Do you know who Simon Brooke was referring to by "corrosive me?
 * people*"? Any reason to think that he didn't just mean Judith and

I'm not asking you to necessarily name names, I'm just curious as to how you've arrived at the conclusion that there are multiple people, who you think of as "trolls", who can't get into URCM but are desperate to do so just so they can bait their victims once again.