Nuxx:De8f368e-e6a5-4ccb-9dfb-e99927ca24ff@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:35:02 -0700 (PDT) References:  <8kdT84Nuu$PKNA$9@gauva.familyfrench.co.uk> <681045t37758lgt8lv2n9r6clfirhl88tj@4ax.com>  <9edeff6b-8f68-461d-b131-c7ea0c49601b@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> Lines: 22 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.150.242 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1245778502 306 127.0.0.1 (23 Jun 2009 17:35:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.150.242; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2432 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:711353

On Jun 23, 9:45=A0am, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Jun 22, 11:47=A0pm, jms  wrote: > > > >As the recipient of said calls I can state that they bloody well did > > >happen, contact me via email if you want more evidence > > Ah yes - the old ones are the best. > > I have plenty of evidence =A0- which I can't post or discuss here - but > > I will if *you* e-mail me. > > The reasons for not making the evidence public are very easy to > understand.

Will you make the evidence available to me if I email you? As you are accusing me I have a right to know what you are basing those accusations upon. Maybe (not at all likely, but it's just possible) there's a genuine misunderstanding on your part, and if so, perhaps I'll be able to clear it up.

If you pretend not to have read this post then it will show that, just as I suspect, you're making the whole thing up and you don't want to be found out.