Nuxx:C3374b5e-c45a-4867-ba81-e987b8f4b528@p37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!p37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: spindthrift - magnatom antics Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 06:41:02 -0800 (PST) References:        <68Yhl.6780$aJ3.722@newsfe23.ams2> <777496e0-8621-428f-b947-9fdc2bb54fe1@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>  <333176e5-16c3-474f-8545-9bcdd4257187@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com>    <6050a5ce-756b-4370-83ac-3fde01618107@g39g2000pri.googlegroups.com> Lines: 114 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.151.152.80 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1234017662 6679 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2009 14:41:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 14:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p37g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.151.152.80; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 7071 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:685241

On Feb 3, 3:06=A0pm, Squashme  wrote: > On 3 Feb, 14:43, _  wrote: > > > > > Squashmewrote: > > > On 3 Feb, 14:25, _  wrote: > > >>Squashmewrote: > > >>> On 3 Feb, 14:19, _ <w...@prettyboy.com> wrote: > > >>>>Squashmewrote: > > >>>>> On 3 Feb, 14:02, _ <w...@prettyboy.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>Squashmewrote: > > >>>>>>> On 3 Feb, 13:15, _ <w...@prettyboy.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>Squashmewrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On 3 Feb, 11:26, JNugent <J...@noparticularplacetogo.com> wro= te: > > >>>>>>>>>> JNugent wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> AndyC wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> "relevant" <m...@privacy.net> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a letter I have sent - perhaps a few more on simi= lar lines > > >>>>>>>>>>>> [big snip] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I notice on this one: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3D7drPCPfWCIQ > > >>>>>>>>>>>> He admits to his mistake of not using the whole lane to ov= ertake, but > > >>>>>>>>>>>> he misses the fact that he overtook a car that was indicat= ing to > > >>>>>>>>>>>> change lane. While that is commonly done by aggressive dri= vers, if you > > >>>>>>>>>>>> do that on two wheels it is suicidal. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> If you are going to overtake a car that is already indicat= ing, whether > > >>>>>>>>>>>> stationary or not, you do so at your own peril. Rights of = way are > > >>>>>>>>>>>> meaningless when you are dead. > > >>>>>>>>>>> In his video "Undertaking On A Roundabout", the same poster= castigates a > > >>>>>>>>>>> car-driver who passes him on the nearside on a large rounda= bout. The > > >>>>>>>>>>> roundabout seems to be the one seen in the video referenced= in the OP > > >>>>>>>>>>> and the cyclist is way over to the offside, hard up against= the island > > >>>>>>>>>>> (incidentally passing over a distinctive hatched-off area). > > >>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps he thinks that it is unlawful to pass on the nearsi= de on a > > >>>>>>>>>>> roundabout (it isn't). And if one really objects to being "= undertaken", > > >>>>>>>>>>> perhaps it'd be btter not to hog the offside edge of the on= e-way stretch > > >>>>>>>>>>> of road which is the carriageway of a large roundabout. > > >>>>>>>>>> Another of his videos ("White van-driver teaches me a lesson= ") appears to be > > >>>>>>>>>> functionally identical to the one involving the private hire= car - recorded > > >>>>>>>>>> over the same route, in the same sort of conditions and almo= st at the same spot. > > >>>>>>>>>> Different motor vehicle, different driver, same cyclist. > > >>>>>>>>>> Anyone spot a pattern here? > > >>>>>>>>> Yes, but let's not be too harsh. Not all motorists are like t= hat. Many > > >>>>>>>>> are not aggressive and do respect other road-users. > > >>>>>>>> LOL. Get some help with your issues, before you end up under m= y wheels. > > >>>>>>> Do you bring your anger problem up at your regular reviews? > > >>>>>>> And thanks for the warning, I shall avoid cycling in Lincolnshi= re. > > >>>>>> Hey, why not complain? You're good at that! LOL > > >>>>>> But no, I dont, because you dont make me angry. You make me laug= h. You > > >>>>>> seem to have real problems with blinkers, old son. And unless yo= u can > > >>>>>> get that sack of spuds off your shoulder, you WILL have a seriou= s > > >>>>>> incident. And since you're on 2 wheels and your inevitable oppon= ent will > > >>>>>> have four, there's a good chance it'll cost you more than cash. = Here's > > >>>>>> hoping, eh? > > >>>>> "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." > > >>>> Would you like the address? > > >>> No thanks it's not Relevant. > > >> As you wish. Now, wanna acknowledge the lawbreaking of Magna/you in = the > > >> video, while you're feeling so magnanimous? > > > > To quote me earlier:- > > > > "Obviously the vast majority of us do not wish to ride > > > around with a head-mounted camera, whose last ever shot is likely to > > > be blue sky and the fading sound of "sorry mate I didn't s..." > > > Yeah, I read it the first time. I still cant see where you said that th= e > > cyclist had broken the law though. Why wont you admit it - its utterly > > clear that his verbal assault amounted to a S5 public order offence. Wh= y > > will you ONLY spot offences by car drivers (and thats on the extremely > > debatable idea that there WAS any). > > > This Sunday I'll be doing a charity race in our gravity racer and I've > > got some questions about bearings and wheels on it. I daren't ask them > > here, because I dont want to be associated with a group which seems to > > REVEL in a reputation of being bitter, twisted, jealous 'cage haters'. > > Sad, that, innit? > > Very sad. You are too full of anger, hate and bile (or as you prefer > to call it, laughter) to post sensible questions to the group, with > which some here could perhaps help. You may not wish to be associated > with URC, but, guess what, here you are. Go on, dare to be a Daniel!

Hello Squashme. Do you admit to being anti-motorist? Do you think that Spindrift is anti-motorist? Tell the truth now.