Nuxx:35e40087-6b92-4d6f-81e6-90852f086288@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <35e40087-6b92-4d6f-81e6-90852f086288@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling,uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:20:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>   <58bbf974-7b02-4806-9a1f-42747b4ee257@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com>  Lines: 37 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243704007 7238 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2009 17:20:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2907 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:829633 uk.net.news.config:124344

On May 28, 1:20=A0pm, Ian Jackson  wrote: > In article <58bbf974-7b02-4806-9a1f-42747b4ee...@n19g2000vba.googlegroups= .com>, > Nuxx Bar =A0 wrote: > > >I do want to be in the group. =A0I object to Ian Jackson having anything > >to do with it, > > At the risk of getting excessively personal, what's your objection to > me ?

See elsewhere in this thread. You have previously claimed that your killfile was taking out something like 80% of messages to URC. That says to me that you killfile anyone who disagrees with you too often and you're proud of it, and when someone like that wishes to start a moderated group, I have to question their motives. You even started reading this thread through your killfile, and only decided to read all messages when you realised that not doing so would harm the prospect of getting the new group in place.

Then there's the fact that you don't even post that often to URC (I had only seen a handful of your posts before you started this moderation business). And you put Chapman's nonsense about phone calls into the pre-RFD as if it were fact, when it's just the unproven allegation of one embittered party.

> > and I especially object to you being a moderator, > > Thanks for your opinion.

...through gritted teeth, I'm sure.

> I'm hoping for a reasonably uncontroversial > moderation panel.

Well, that at least I agree with.