Nuxx:MPG.26f880b75ae258c59897e8@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: How best to respond to an offensive post? Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:41:28 +0100 References: <8f717lF59oU1@mid.individual.net>    Lines: 13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 0004e833.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=MQ\]`, g6jns@yahoo.co.uk says... > > Surely this is censorship rather than moderation?

Correct. They've had a year for URCM to "settle down" and yet we're to me that Jackson et al have made a decision that they're going to defy uk.* rules by being deliberately unbalanced, and they're going to carry on doing it, arrogantly ignoring all criticism, until if and when they are forced to stop. So that is what will have to be done. Sooner or later they will have to accept that they can have their private club, or they can have a uk.* newsgroup, but they can't have both.
 * still* getting this sort of nonsense just as much as ever. It's clear