Nuxx:E95013b5-24c9-48a0-b075-6b0bcc44d953@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Labyrinthine paranoia Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 05:29:33 -0700 (PDT) References: <6fbgldFanc9cU1@mid.individual.net>      <395d142d-7081-4b91-92a8-eed081475f48@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>    Lines: 39 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217593773 6416 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 12:29:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:29:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3638 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:660139

On Jul 31, 11:20=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:51:16 -0700 (PDT), Nuxx Bar >  said in > : > > >I've told you at least six times before: EITHER SUBSTANTIATE YOUR > >ACCUSATIONS THAT I'M NOT COMING UP WITH MY OWN WORDS, OR STOP MAKING > >THEM. > > SHOUTING DOES NOT MAKE YOUR FATUOUS ARGUMENT ANY MORE CREDIBLE. > > You are obviously far too busy inventing words to put into other > people's mouths to spend the trivial amount of time required to > understand the accusation against you. =A0Smith invented his own mad > thesis, that cameras kill. =A0You don't even have that small thing > going for you, you simply peddle Smith's discredited and nonsensical > arguments and, abject coward that you are, you are too craven even > to do so under your own name. > > Smith was an inventive kook who put his name to his nonsensical > ideas, you don't have either of those (minor) saving graces.

You really are an absolute wanker. Paul Smith's arguments are TRUE FACTS: he never had any ownership of them, and he was quite happy for people to propagate them. I understand and agree with those arguments wholeheartedly, so why the hell shouldn't I use them myself in reply to your agenda-driven falsehoods? Is everything that you come up with your own, original work? Aren't you stealing Shakespeare's words? You complete fuckwit.

Anyway, even if you take out Paul Smith's excellent arguments from my posts, there is still plenty left that is entirely my own stuff. Also, all phrasing is mine. I do not copy and paste from elsewhere, or reference any other page the vast majority of the time. Compare that to Spindrift, who almost exclusively copies and pastes.

You really do just come up with any ludicrous accusations that you can possibly think of, and you don't give a monkey's whether they're remotely true. You absolute turd.