Nuxx:A89514f9-cb0e-4251-a4ea-73eb71c30177@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: OT: Safespeed perceptions Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:43:51 -0700 (PDT) References:  <63b3a3a7-9687-4d86-8733-06b040a146fa@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> Lines: 50 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217288632 31735 127.0.0.1 (28 Jul 2008 23:43:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3118 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:659427

On Jul 28, 2:14=A0pm, spindrift  wrote: > On Jul 28, 1:57=A0pm, Tony Raven  wrote: > > > > > From today's Metro, an insight into Safespeed perceptions fo the law: > > > "Traffic bosses are to set up a second roadside speed camera to keep > > watch on one that keeps getting vandalised. =A0The =A324,000 Gatso on t= he > > B5246 near Preston has been set on fire twice and was pushed over last > > week. =A0Now Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety wants to put up > > another camera to monitor it" > > > Then, the bit worth waiting for.... > > > "But Claire Armstrong of pressure group Safespeed said the culprits wer= e > > probably law-abiding citizens taking direct action against speed > > cameras" > > > Explains a lot that does. > > > -- > > Tony > > > Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you > > please. > > - Mark Twain > > So Claire thinks that arsonists are "law-abiding"? > > Setting fire to public property is utterly pointless, no safety camera > destroyed by fire is not replaced, it's just a waste of money. > > I thought smith's widow would have had the sense to distance herself > from these idiots, she's made a major blunder here, not everyone knows > about the latent lawlessnesss and criminality of the safespeeding > supporters. > > They do now.

Feel free, at any time, to stop making ludicrous, fanciful claims about those who oppose camera enforcement, and tell us why you hate motorists so much. Is there actually any reason behind it, or have you yourself long since forgotten what's behind your anti-driver crusade? And if you have forgotten, don't you think it's time to stop giving motorists such a hard time, and accept that they're here to stay? Isn't it time to stop this purposeless negativity? If not now, then when?