Nuxx:85265a76-a135-4ba9-8fcb-f4144cd15061@h11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!h11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <85265a76-a135-4ba9-8fcb-f4144cd15061@h11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Dave Horton again Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:58:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <7b31a877-02c8-4bdb-a080-483ec492d669@l10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>   <6d5a779715v9tcvvt7q1r957sgu9n4fose@4ax.com> <9dm73vF65tU2@mid.individual.net>   <9dmipmF78iU2@mid.individual.net>  Lines: 50 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.113.137.62 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1316458684 24420 127.0.0.1 (19 Sep 2011 18:58:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: h11g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=87.113.137.62; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0.2,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 4345 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:1053827

On Sep 19, 2:07=A0pm, The Medicated Handyman  wrote: > > i hope so, i like games - my guess is that legal action has been taken > in order to identify and prosecute someone for making crank telephone cal= ls

Well isn't it strange that the "someone" in question has heard the square root of bugger all about the matter? May I suggest that your sociopathic car-hating idol is telling, well, Porkies? But no, you're one of the "I'm absolutely determined to believe what I want to believe, no matter how much contrary evidence is amassed" bunch, aren't you? Bless.

> i also guess that this may be connected to the recent posting of > personal information here followed by the sudden and unexplained > disappearance of the mentally unstable cyber stalker known as Nuxxy

It's only "unexplained" to those who can't read (say, those who are mentally unstable?) In any case, until you post under your usual nym, what you are saying has even less credibility than it would anyway. (Hint: we're a LONG way below zero.)

Just accept it: no "stalking" has taken place, and this latest (and particularly unpleasant and deceitful, even for them) tactic that the car-haters/psycholists have come up with to silence their opponents, their awkward questions, and their annoying habit of proving them wrong has utterly and laughably failed. Well, I suppose you have to keep trying these things...you're just about clever enough to realise that engaging your opponents in fair and reasoned debate will result in your extremely quick, comprehensive and humiliating defeat.

So all you can do is head off and drown out awkward mentions of regression to the mean, the 85th percentile, proper helmet research, and all those other annoying scientific approaches to real road safety, while being as underhand and spiteful as you can be. Hey, it hasn't worked yet, but who knows, maybe it'll start one day...if the medicine doesn't work, double the dose (talking of which, isn't it time that we plastered the country with another 6000 speed cameras...that's what you want, isn't it? Punish those bastard motorists and pretend it's about road safety...genius!  What's that, it's killing thousands of extra people?  Oh well, it's worth it, if you believe your messiah.  But sssh, it's a secret that he thinks that!)

Now, as I said before, don't mention me (by implication or otherwise) and I won't come back. Your call. I'd really rather not have to deal with your ilk again, as it's so depressing engaging with intellectually dishonest, utterly predictable, car-hating halfwits, but I will if I have to.