Nuxx:M6f3g4l97mvlv5n6ejsh4k3i0ukk0jbr7t@4ax.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.pipex.net!news.pipex.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Worthy of Warrington. Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:37:43 +0100 References:   <2a808e46-140b-4ad7-8a96-d7e574888681@u65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <6mdqr6Fg8vpnU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 59 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:38:56 -0500 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.220.249 X-Trace: sv3-2VnOBTsNU1KRokWp7dfcyUl/HBhMgjPsgb9Hf3spUUBwuF61Vb6gN6hO274Mv8nY5wae7HHjM3jmIC/!BH1CN4ukyyVK5uqB+md9g8Bp4XwXCN43uSQDvZOg8McNCub3wmd6v7R5TkaoXxJDF/8oFNJKSTRA!/V5QRRaH+lUmTGuEm26QDXs= X-Complaints-To: abuse@dsl.pipex.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@dsl.pipex.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.39 Bytes: 4207 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:673637

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:46:36 +0100, John  wrote:

>al Mossah wrote: >> On 24 Oct, 08:15, _  wrote: >> >>> Doubtless you'd rather they had lifted the car, painted the lines >>> under it, and put it back, only for the driver to come back to a >>> ticket. And yes, that *has* happened, many, many times, in Camden for >>> one. Not that there's anything anti-motorist about that of course. >>> >>> Let's face it, you and many others here would find that funnier than >>> you did the bulging lines. Not that there's anything anti-motorist >>> about you lot of course. >> >> Well, yes, it would have some comedy value, worthy of Candid Camera of >> Noel Edmonds in days gone by. Next time it happens, please video it >> and put it up on Youtube. Shouldn't be too difficult if it happens >> many many times. > >There are already some on there. > >Here's one: > > >And another similar idea: > > >And in the BBC news too: > > > >

D'oh! al "Mr Clever" Mossah wasn't expecting that, and will doubtless now go into a sulk. You'll definitely be branded a "troll" here from now on: claiming that the authorities are anti-motorist is bad enough, but actually proving it so that it can't be denied? Unbelievable. You're simply not allowed to challenge the "established truths" here, two of which are that there's nothing whatsoever anti-motorist about a single authority in the UK, and there's nothing whatsoever anti-motorist about a single poster here (except those who are open about it, like David Damerell, and Chapman...oh no, hang on, he's taken the bits about himself "hating cagers" and being "anti-motorist" down from his site now, as if people will suddenly stop believing that he's a motorist-hater as a result, when actually it just makes him look absolutely desperate to cover it up...his ineptitude and absurd idiocy do at least make him amusing, even if he is a *horrible* person).

Another "truth" is that speed cameras save lives. Don't you *dare* show that to be nonsense. Spindrift has launched hate campaigns against people and even made threats which had workplaces evacuated just for that. He and his ilk clearly love speed cameras, and are clearly very keen to stop the facts about them not saving lives from being propagated...now why would they do that, unless they wanted cameras for some reason other than safety? And what could that reason be other than a wish to bully and harass motorists? Spindrift and co are hardly forthcoming with alternative explanations, quite possibly because there ARE NONE.