Nuxx:MPG.2655195d7d3be9bc989745@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!feed4.jnfs.ja.net!jnfs.ja.net!gemini.csx.cam.ac.uk!news.cam.ac.uk!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Subject: Re: Meta: (was: Re: Funny sign on a HGV) Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 23:49:01 +0100 References: <%MFEn.41657$6A5.28727@newsfe21.ams2> <+JTHoKeS2V6LFwRP@[127.0.0.1]>  <2n2ju5hcdk49oa66gudv3lsln0rq6e60v8@4ax.com>  Lines: 8 Organization: Zen Internet Approved: uk.rec.cycling.moderated approval key  NNTP-Posting-Host: rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Moderation: [127369447925983] See http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/urcm/ X-Spam-Check-By: spam-5.mail.thdo.gradwell.net User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.14 X-Trace: DXC=?XBHTb^?OBkeBWYdG]_DibYjZGX^207Pk`<MJMoM3PFm]cETS^;4choBH4535cfTO`eB3^TT1a[]ekmXe8okT<Fb X-Complaints-To: abuse@zen.co.uk X-Gradwell-Message-ID: 38092848 X-Gradwell-Forwarding-Rule: 1238298 X-Gradwell-Edge-Server: inbound-edge-10.mail.thdo.gradwell.net X-Gwh-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Gwh-Spam-Flags: BAYES_00 X-Auth: PGPMoose V2.0 PGP uk.rec.cycling.moderated iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL6zBdAAoJEJ0q8Kb5p+MeHRsH/3OX66LhCo0qY33aLTBbdZ5Y Lv5cGxnEWOjiMFz7kgPJAxk4KbkM5brbhe9tBogZQgJsxu5PDjYLAwPw54dp3VTo jUYcpV0j0EiF7eUDqWynDC7K4TvZMFlHwfi0coekTyw+Qz23/nUl+wFMI0aDFslr at+EBpbc3dwXbp7XeznI1uRk912II4G4pOEMOVtZfXT3HG9tKc7uhIV0gIB3rhae L/bJyrjsmcZV9HL0BoB90cYkBDeZh1vrHmf+T0HFdNSqb1ptO6euq0KaddrklIcy sMziFjpGNdgyYghozkUmeg0TSuF6ZCwH1Nw8EGe9DkEg+DdJETJ/CGo75TY/cgs= =qEPS Originator: webstump@chiark.greenend.org.uk ([212.13.197.229]) Bytes: 2422 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling.moderated:38505

In article , nmm1@cam.ac.uk says... > > Providing that postings are reasonably polite, > reasonably relevant, and not attempting to flood the newgroup with > repetitive junk, I do not believe that they should be censored.

I agree. And post content rather than poster should be what is judged.