Nuxx:B4d677fe-0b4d-413b-928f-ac05f1dd18cf@s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: delete newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT) References:  <7jeife5a9a.fsf@rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk> <4usb36pfi8plapi16rlpqenu7hugjfgegg@4ax.com>  <1vtc36pf2b3ndsfq17huub5en93o1agv39@4ax.com>  Lines: 14 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1278720988 24553 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2010 00:16:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 GTB7.1 GTBA,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2232 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:61462

On Jul 9, 1:54=A0pm, Pedt <"\"@ @\""@some.oddities-etc.co.uk> wrote: > In message <1vtc36pf2b3ndsfq17huub5en93o1ag...@4ax.com>, at 02:14:42 on > Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Phil W Lee  wibbled > >On the contrary, it argues a strong case for the deletion of > >uk.net.news.* > > And would that be because an RFD has appeared that you disagree with?

Yes, it would, and perhaps now you're getting an idea of what URCM supporters are really like in terms of going all out to censor their opponents at every turn. (Then there's the fact that Anchor has got the wrong end of the stick anyway, another "URCM-esque" trait...the RFD is a trojan horse to stop anything really being done about the severely substandard and malevolent "moderation" we currently have.)