Nuxx:F329987c-f71d-4be5-892e-71477b9cb2b2@f11g2000vbx.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!f11g2000vbx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:41:55 -0700 (PDT) References:  <8vhhinFfagU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 28 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301571715 5747 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2011 11:41:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: f11g2000vbx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2578 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:39717

On Mar 30, 9:19=A0pm, Tony Raven  wrote: > Tom Crispin  wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:55:18 +0100, Simon Brooke > > > We are not talking about the occasional wrong decision here. We are > > talking about blatant victimisation, fabrication of evidence and > > application of rules retrospective of being made. > > if you want Tom, why not hold your conversations with the blocked posters > in urc. =A0I'm sure Judith, Nuxx and others will demonstrate what a sensi= ble > grown up conversation they can have when moderators do not interfere. =A0= When > you've achieved that, perhaps the moderators will reconsider.

Tony J Raven. In common with most of your posts, I don't even know where to start in showing how the above is wrong.

Firstly, you post to URC *much* more than I do. In fact, you're one of the top posters there...why exactly do you bother with it at all if you're so happy with URCM's "moderation"? Is it for the same reason as Chapman: if you want to make a post full of anti-motorist bollocks, and you want to ensure that no-one is allowed to point out how it's wrong, then you use URCM; but if you just want a good argument then you use URC?

In any case, your comments on my URCM ban make no sense: why do *you* (not the "moderators", you) think I should be banned from there?