Nuxx:Ea0dd7d4-6887-4291-bf5e-89a49bbba5d5@v38g2000yqb.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!v38g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Cyclist against proposed speed limit reduction. Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:53:16 -0700 (PDT) References: <7qWdnSTj4MwD1yfUnZ2dnUVZ8uGdnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>   Lines: 27 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.147 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237096396 25800 127.0.0.1 (15 Mar 2009 05:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v38g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.147; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2567 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:689380

On Mar 14, 10:29=A0am, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:03:17 -0000, "Light of Aria" >  said in > : > > >Vehicles are safer when driven quickly by alert drivers than driven slow= ly > >by half-comatose drivers playing with themselves. > > Really? =A0So how do you explain the fact that drivers with multiple > speeding convictions are more likely, mileage adjusted, to be > involved in collisions? =A0Or the fact that both probability and > severity of collisions rise with average speed for a given type of > road? =A0 > > I believe you are presenting a false dichotomy here. =A0The safest > combination is probably cars driven at sensible speeds by alert > drivers; the idea that all the alert drivers are driving fast and > all the slow drivers are away with the fairies is not one for which > I have seen any credible supporting evidence. =A0Do feel free to cite > some.

Oh, what a fucking surprise that you support the proposed NSL reduction, you lying car-hating cunt. Why not put back the web page where you admitted to being anti-motorist and stop attempting to deceive people? No-one's falling for it, you utter prick.