Nuxx:7112cb84-912e-49e2-b328-1502e6d125b6@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <7112cb84-912e-49e2-b328-1502e6d125b6@n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT) References: <1j0pdfw.jl9zy61kp6rshN%%steve%@malloc.co.uk>  <8$cpm9EgSEKKFwG1@[127.0.0.1]> <78r12aF1ngb1iU1@mid.individual.net>  <39qi259ef67cfbf5va35g128lg25rv2bm9@4ax.com>  <45405b45-80f0-4814-986a-ea65ed62374e@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> Lines: 26 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244311984 21884 127.0.0.1 (6 Jun 2009 18:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: n19g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2765 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:53285 uk.rec.cycling:5134

On Jun 6, 12:23=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > > http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/search?q=3Djudith+author:gu= y.chap...@spamcop.net > 200 posts by me mentioning judith, which will include most replies to > judith as judith forms part of your most common nyms whereas my > surname does not for part of my nym.

...but it *does* form part of your email address (you know, the one that you started using after being told not to use your previous forging address). You even used it in the search, so you're either being thick or deceitful.

> You also found it necessary to post three near-identical replies to a > forgery, all stating (falsely and with no evidence) that I was the > forger. =A0I'd already pointed out that it was a forgery, so had Alan, > who had identified the most likely culprit.

IT WASN'T ME, you bloody hypocrite. You, on the other hand, *did* post as Lou Knee, didn't you?

> I am aware of my faults, you appear to be in denial about your own.

Take a look in the mirror, if you can bear to, what with having a face that only a mother could love (as Encyclopedia Dramatica put it).