Nuxx:A0cbdcb3-de37-44b0-8b9d-c6f7b25a9fe0@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: RFD: create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:02:33 -0700 (PDT) References:   <316e09e5-0ad6-46cd-8bee-806dc0ec7877@j18g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <929819a9-b5e2-40fc-b813-a11f74523a70@r3g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> Lines: 22 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243965753 26553 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2009 18:02:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2466 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:124449

On Jun 2, 4:39=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Jun 1, 11:24=A0pm, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > There's a good reason for that. =A0This whole thing is just an elaborat= e > > exercise to get rid of those with the "wrong" opinions while > > pretending that it's about "moderation". =A0It's an absolute disgrace > > and a deceptive abuse of process. =A0Censorship, as opposed to proper > > moderation, has no place on usenet. > > Funny, not so long ago you seemed to be quite comfortable with the > idea of dictating what may or may not be discussed here: > > http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/82fef468135cbb98 > > I don't think much of your stated moderation policy though.

I thought you'd "killfiled" me? Is this a belated admission that you've done no such thing? Or are you pretending to be one of the organisers of the new group by deigning to read just this thread without your non-existent killfile?