Nuxx:MPG.2586c4ee52e8b7b9896d3@news.zen.co.uk

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!dedekind.zen.co.uk!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!prichard.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Guy Cuthbertson  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Revenue-Raising Tickets for Parking on Private Land Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:19:21 -0000 References:    <2MSdnZg_NZ-sZIbWnZ2dnUVZ7oCdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>   Lines: 99 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.9.13 Organization: Zen Internet NNTP-Posting-Host: 62664468.news.zen.co.uk X-Trace: DXC=YYThX, nobby@invalid.invalid says... > > Guy Cuthbertson  wrote: > > > > Oh and Nob, can you actually explain what was "crap" about the post that > > you replied to? No, of course not, you can just make generalised slurs > > because you know really that it was spot on. > > Naaa, Nuxxy babes, I don't need to explain to *anyone* other than you > what was crap about that post, and I can't be arsed explaining it > to you because it wouldn't make any difference.

You *can't* explain what was crap about it, because you know that most or all of it made perfect sense. It's so entirely obvious that you might as well admit it for your own sake. Be gracious in defeat. Come on, it's not the end of the world...it's only one argument that you've lost. Don't compound the problem now.

> > It wouldn't hurt you to accept when someone makes a good point, whether > > or not you consider them one of your opponents. > > No, and indeed it doesn't. But I've never known you to make a good point,

You're almost certainly lying. Every now and then I even think that C***man makes a good point (it's very rare, but it does happen). Many of my opinions are shared by the majority of UK voters...it's simply inconceivable that you wouldn't agree with a single one. You're making silly claims, then making even sillier claims in order to back those up, and so on. It's getting ridiculous now. When you're in a hole, stop digging.

Despite what you appear to think, you're really not making yourself look very clever at the moment. Just take a step back and have a really honest look at the last couple of posts you've made...not very good, are they? In your next post, try to post correctly by not repeating the errors that you've made previously in this thread.

> and I don't consider you an opponent, just a very sadly damaged individual > who is too locked up in his own self importance to have anything to say > that has any connection to the real world.

Yes, obviously you can tell all that about someone from what they post in a newsgroup full of deranged car-hating extremists. You can't reason with such extremists (I have tried), and they don't appreciate courteous behaviour (in fact they just take advantage), so why bother with either? Would you behave the same towards a group of decent, rational, sincere, unselfish people who were amenable to reason as you would towards a group of unpleasant, lying, scheming, agenda-driven bastards who were so callous and so rabidly determined to bully motorists that they advocated anti-car measures which they knew were *killing thousands of people*? I'm afraid I find it difficult to treat those sorts of people the same as I do most people, and if you don't like that then so be it, but I think you'll find most people are the same to one extent or another. Regardless, you have no idea about me, and that's the way it's going to stay.

And BTW, some of your posts really do suggest that the person writing them may have serious problems. Whether you actually do or not, I'm not arrogant enough to claim to know, because (like you when it comes to me) I don't have enough information to make a judgment on it. It's only the really obvious ones like Spindrift where you can tell with more-or-less complete certainty that the person is truly mental...I'm sure even you wouldn't deny that he has issues, though since he's a car-hater like you, that must cause problems for your black and white "Everyone who agrees with me is automatically right about everything and good in every way, and the opposite is also true" view of the world (which some might say was rather childlike).

> > It would mean that next > > time you really thought what they were saying was "crap", people would > > believe you, instead of (rightly) thinking you were just calling it > > "crap" because you didn't like them (which is the kind of thing that > > little kids do...you know, those little kids which you have such a > > complex about that one is forced to wonder whether you'd a paedo?) > > I'm not sure that anyone other than you has said that they don't believe > me. You keep on wondering if I'm a paedo, Nuxxy. I guess when you're as > badly damaged as you are it's something you have to wonder about everyone, > eh? Not everyone's bad in that way, though, no matter what your experiences > in the past.

Making light of child abuse. Real funny and clever. Anyone here who really has been abused is now going to hate you (and rightly so). Congrats. I thought everything you said was designed to get maximum cred from your Master (C***man)? Just a hunch but I don't think he'll like that, having two youngish kids of his own. Best make it up to His Highness ASAP. Maybe you could sacrifice yourself?

Oh, and don't worry if you find any of my points too difficult to address...just "do a C***man" and refuse to answer them. That'll mean that you can avoid losing face...it's not like people will be able to see straight through your little ploy, meaning that you lose more face than you would have if you'd just answered. Ooh no, definitely not. People won't think you're a chicken either. So just go right ahead and evade any points that you can't counter. (That'll be a lot of evasion then.)