Nuxx:Gzb6l.59352$UQ2.14958@newsfe25.ams2

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feeder.news-service.com!69.16.177.246.MISMATCH!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf02.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe25.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: _  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Question for Chapman. Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:46:24 +0000 References:  <651d4ed0-649e-4d41-a10f-35c38263f2bd@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com> 	<9opfl4dsag8d9b9pl3fmkvrdig3tjv24sn@4ax.com> <3c0e3903-d0e9-49e7-b6fc-1a48b23dd48a@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Lines: 36 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3c0e3903-d0e9-49e7-b6fc-1a48b23dd48a@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.21.204.127 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: newsfe25.ams2 1230587212 82.21.204.127 (Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:46:52 UTC) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 21:46:52 UTC Organization: virginmedia.com Bytes: 3174 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:682071

Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: > On Dec 28, 8:52 pm, judithtaylorsm...@privacy.net wrote: > >> If Chapman continues to tell lies about me - then I will continue to >> question them. > > And you think that making hundreds of posts with lies and distortions > about me, while I very obviously do my best to ignore you, is a good > way of achieving that? Wow, that really is bizarre behaviour. Even > if your claim were true, which, as has been established multiple > times, it is not, your approach is very close to 100% guaranteed to > achieve the exact opposite of what you want. > > No wonder everyone thinks you're just a troll. Or have you not > noticed that everyone in this group (with the notable exceptions of > nully and nuxx bar) has either killfiled you or limits themselves to > occasionally pointing out that you are behaving like a mad person? > > Seriously you are pursuing a personal vendetta about some trivial and > imagined slight - on fucking /usenet/ for Godwin's sake - well past > the point where anybody even close to rational would have dropped it. > > It's 21:20 on December 31. My New Year's resolution is not to reply to > you at all, ever again. Since the only place these supposed "lies" > ever occur is when I lose patience and point out to you /yet again/ > that we've already given you the proof they are not lies, I take it we > can all rest assured that you will no longer be posting here again? > > To be absolutely clear: I will never speak of you again, ever, at > all. Therefore none of these so-called "lies" will happen again. > Therefore, by your own words, you will shut up. Sounds like a good > deal to me. Unless, of course, your statement quoted above was a > lie. But you would never tell a lie, would you, judith? > How incredibly sad are you that with three hours of the old year to go, you're here on Usenet?