Nuxx:6be1e9bb-d1c1-4a14-a63c-aa6e91268645@r17g2000vbc.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!r17g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <6be1e9bb-d1c1-4a14-a63c-aa6e91268645@r17g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:03:02 -0800 (PST) References: <4_ydnZpOJKf8keXQnZ2dnUVZ8jKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>  <3fd9f5fc-ab1e-4b80-8141-f8ca23c707d8@u14g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <1b69b10d-4e22-4938-8067-da805b1a0fb7@p12g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>  <143b0757-6529-4992-ba89-f3bbe3aa2fee@s18g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>    <74d5df0d-37f8-43a7-a7d9-b5b6c6ec7934@a26g2000vbo.googlegroups.com> <546405783321530292.588814%steve%-malloc.co.uk@news.individual.net>  <1jxyu27.15xikt51j2a3qcN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> Lines: 17 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299870182 1975 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2011 19:03:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 19:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r17g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2834 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38793

On Mar 11, 1:09=A0pm, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote: > > It takes two to make trouble. You can ignore the person whom you dislike > or disdain. On a newsgroup like this one, they just make themselves look > silly trying unsuccessfully to provoke you while you ignore them.

You're right. I should just not respond to "Trollsworth LeTrole"'s pathetic attempts at antagonism. I'll endeavour not to do so.

(Incidentally you really should require TlT to identify who he used to post as before allowing him to be a moderator in your Great New URCM. If he doesn't then I will. I can see why he doesn't want it to come out, bearing in mind who he did use to post as, but he has no choice in the matter.  If you want URCM to genuinely improve then the current level of self-serving secrecy from the "moderators" must become a thing of the past.)