Nuxx:A47a46f0-8636-4bf7-a1f9-560b38864d54@a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Question for Guy Chapman Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:32:44 -0700 (PDT) References:   <78244oF1k595qU2@mid.individual.net>  <782gouF1jctl0U1@mid.individual.net>  <7830v4F1k10vfU1@mid.individual.net> <0apo155bbi2p58shmukgn362v7s0eeiiht@4ax.com>  Lines: 24 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243474364 26157 127.0.0.1 (28 May 2009 01:32:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:32:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2812 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:704771

On May 27, 8:25=A0pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"  wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009 22:56:30 +0100, Phil W Lee > >  wrote: > >No, it would be the one where a common proxy address is assumed to be > >unique to a specific poster, and an entire vendetta is started based > >on the assumption that two people using it must be one and the same. > > Don't forget the bit about the posts from Lou Knee saying he's not me, > and the posts from completely different addresses with which I have no > connection whatsoever. =A0A proper judith vendetta must, after all, be > pursued in the face of large amounts of conflicting evidence as well > as simply attributing malice and conspiracy to something with a much > more plausible and innocent explanation.

Surely even you don't underestimate people's intelligence to that degree. Absolutely *anyone* could post as Lou Knee right now. That makes no difference whatsoever to the pattern of previous Lou Knee posts and the most likely explanation by far: YOU MADE THOSE POSTS.

This whole Lou Knee saga has achieved what many thought was unachievable: it's made you look *even more* of a fuckwit, even to those who already detested you utterly.