Nuxx:352c94da-ab5b-4c8e-be34-1e389f246239@j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <352c94da-ab5b-4c8e-be34-1e389f246239@j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation,uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:51:58 -0700 (PDT) References:  <3aq6o6hq020ter1ke3io47qt6i3sopet3n@4ax.com> <9ICdnZOJPYS_8x7QnZ2dnUVZ8jSdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>  <50xo7XKtY3gNFw7Y@[127.0.0.1]> <8uiafcFcerU1@mid.individual.net>  <8ujuo6Fa89U1@mid.individual.net>  <8ukd7vFn01U1@mid.individual.net>    Lines: 27 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1300636319 26120 127.0.0.1 (20 Mar 2011 15:51:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: j13g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=WrLs9woAAAD151hWKA9yknAtxFHW4kE4 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3033 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:803332

On Mar 20, 3:02=A0pm, "Wm..."  wrote: > > My conclusion is that you don't like people. =A0I know that is scary > territory, but can't think of anything else obvious. =A0Most people like > other people. =A0You should try it some time, JMS.

Judith appears to like me. We have exchanged a number of pleasant emails. You (and others) may well say "Oh, well, she would like Nuxx", but nevertheless, what you say is (as usual) invalid. (Sorry, no, you wouldn't say "*she* would like Nuxx" because of your unreasonable obsession over Judith supposedly not being female.)

An unpleasant person is rude to people who haven't done anything to them. I have *never* seen Judith do this, and I challenge anyone to come up with an example. She doesn't take shit from people but that's not a bad thing. We each have our own way of dealing with those who attack us, and "Attack is the best form of defence" is considered valid by many.

I agree (as usual) with Geoff: this characterisation of Judith as the devil incarnate is utterly ridiculous. I don't know whether the perpetrators are genuinely hypersensitive or whether they're just putting it on because of their well-known intolerance of posters who have the "wrong" opinions. I suspect it's usually the latter.

Bloody psycholists.