Nuxx:384088d7-bd50-43a0-a3c9-7e8b10f3d4db@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <384088d7-bd50-43a0-a3c9-7e8b10f3d4db@h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:44:25 -0700 (PDT) References: <2lc*4xWHs@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>  Lines: 11 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.156.251.27 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243737865 5700 127.0.0.1 (31 May 2009 02:44:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 02:44:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: h23g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.156.251.27; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 1924 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:705683

On May 30, 1:06=A0pm, Danny Colyer  wrote: > 

Do you think that people who are abusing the cause of cycling in order to pursue a "hidden" anti-motorist agenda should be allowed to do it on the new group? I'm not asking for your opinion on whether such people exist or who they are (the answers are obviously "Yes" and "Chapman, Spindrift and others" respectively), I'm just asking whether you think such people should be permitted to perform such activities, and whether you think that pretending to be "pro-cycling" when you're actually just anti-motorist is a good thing for cycling in general.