Nuxx:1ac5bbdf-bf59-4112-a655-1cddb56dc9c7@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <1ac5bbdf-bf59-4112-a655-1cddb56dc9c7@u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.config Subject: Re: 2nd RFD: delete newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:54:32 -0700 (PDT) References:   <89p1qqF4vtU2@mid.individual.net> <0_2dndWXSOW7z6rRnZ2dnUVZ8hidnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <89p497Fmo4U1@mid.individual.net>  <89pmdsF6alU1@mid.individual.net>   <89fg36dn6ab7551vno0e0r143f0lf3b5bb@4ax.com>   <89r1pnFdv5U6@mid.individual.net>  Lines: 20 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1278849273 16605 127.0.0.1 (11 Jul 2010 11:54:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:54:33 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6 GTB7.1 GTBA,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2834 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.config:61632

On Jul 10, 9:55=A0pm, Andy Leighton  wrote: > Yes there are loons on both sides. =A0We all know who they are. =A0They a= re > the people who claim that the other side are murdering bastards

Do feel free to come up with another name for those who support [x] in the full knowledge that [x] kills people, while also having influence over the deployment of [x]. I think you'll find this is yet another one of those "inconvenient truth" things.

> I will say that if the cycling loon (I only really know one) starts > posting to URCM we will not give him carte blanche but will moderate > him just the same as we do others.

But for different reasons. You treat Matt B the way you do because you don't like him challenging "your side" on certain points and you're not sure "your side" can win the debates with him. You would only treat Doug that way because (unlike most of you) he's a little bit too honest about hating cars, and you want to keep that particular agenda of yours "secret". You don't want him letting the side down.