Nuxx:B4d67f29-0a42-464e-9232-8eed52f8b115@t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Keep right at chicane. Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:59:42 -0700 (PDT) References: <2YSdndZTQdvK-s3XnZ2dnUVZ8rKdnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>    <27e3146e-9022-4c22-be0d-a1d2099d3180@g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <54b11075-61e2-444c-b5be-54f637dd5056@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> Lines: 42 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.163.209.43 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1246942784 24117 127.0.0.1 (7 Jul 2009 04:59:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.163.209.43; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.11) Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3201 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:715311

On Jul 6, 9:55=A0pm, Simon Brooke  wrote: > On 6 July, 20:41, Nuxx Bar  wrote: > > > > > On Jul 6, 2:44=A0pm, Alistair Gunn  wrote: > > > > Ian Jackson twisted the electrons to say: > > > > > 404 Not Found > > > > The requested URL /~allyg/tmpimages/skeldergate.jpg was not found o= n > > > > this server. > > > > =A0I noticed Nuxxy was starting his own thread using that URL > > > without so much as a by your leave, so I deleted the image early. > > > How am I supposed to get your permission to link to an image on your > > site if you've killfiled me? > > > Anyway, I had a local copy of the image so I've uploaded it here: > > >http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/8219/skeldergate.jpg > > I trust you had the permission of the copyright holder to do that?

Again, you wouldn't have said that if someone you agreed with had uploaded the image. Do you think this biased treatment fills people with confidence about you "moderating" properly?

Someone said in another thread something like this (in reference to how URCM "moderation"/censorship will be conducted): "For those with the right opinions, rules will be found to let every post of theirs through; for those with the wrong opinions, rules will be found to block every post of theirs." That sounded to me like exactly what was going to happen, and you've just demonstrated that very well by doing the same to me here: you've scrambled around trying to find a rule which prevented me from posting that picture, simply because I have the "wrong" opinions. You wouldn't have done so if I'd had the "right" opinions, would you? Would you?

And the answer to the question is "None of your business".