Nuxx:Edae8998-c829-447f-ade8-349eebb7ed5e@u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:33:09 -0800 (PST) References: <4_ydnZpOJKf8keXQnZ2dnUVZ8jKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>  <1jxwvs7.1msjdvu1d5g9qhN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>  <30lhn6pm38uu9n3ifkgc2i232pahh52qes@4ax.com> <08d62cf4-5669-433f-a41a-185e33a6b568@y3g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <8ts3anFclsU1@mid.individual.net> <1jxx2vc.lziwhi1qkm1hkN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> <42nhn6p4q1mt853d5592na4djl5bhcf2mr@4ax.com> <1jxx40p.11xjgwmwhwm0wN%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk> Lines: 27 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299767590 17590 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2011 14:33:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2869 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38675

On Mar 10, 2:27=A0pm, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote: > Geoff Berrow  wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:02:45 +0000, > > real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M. Procida) wrote: > > > >>http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=3DMRD > > > >Matthew Vernon isn't a moderator, and he has no particular axe to grin= d, > > >so it seems reasonable - not to mention polite - to assume that he is > > >speaking for himself as a reader of the group. > > > It's equally reasonable and polite to assume I have both a brain and a > > memory. > > Maybe you know something about Matthew that other people don't, that > would give people a reason to thnk that his opinion might be dismissed > with "well he would say that, wouldn't he?"

He works on Debian with Ian Jackson. He has always been on Jackson's "side" before IIRC. It's fair to assume that their mates, and that Mathew Vernon's loyalty to Jackson is probably more important to him than creating a genuinely fair URCM.

But if you don't like the sound of that for whatever reason then feel free to disregard it.