Nuxx:6c1e5822-7458-4945-bc56-d1ace894ef0f@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com

Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID: <6c1e5822-7458-4945-bc56-d1ace894ef0f@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.rec.cycling Subject: Re: Chapman: His Agenda Exposed Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:43:01 -0700 (PDT) References: <0f3fd3c5-7db2-47aa-bbd5-bbbae629d329@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6fg1d3FbcseoU1@mid.individual.net> <96o5941n82ql2iacpfcr2p051ck8u3shdl@4ax.com> <6fg9bhFbd4rmU1@mid.individual.net> Lines: 29 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.105.145.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1217590982 30802 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2008 11:43:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.105.145.93; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2505 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.rec.cycling:660118

On Aug 1, 12:11=A0pm, "Paul - xxx"  wrote: > judith wrote: > > On 1 Aug 2008 08:56:03 GMT, "Paul - xxx"  > > wrote: > > > > > > > Question 2 is a personal decision. =A0If you'd read about GC (all > > > freely available on t'net) you'd have already seen the reasoning > > > behind it and wouldn't need to ask the question. > > > Where Question 2 is > > =A0Are you going to either substantiate or retract your > > accusation that I've been using other people's words? > > > You what? > > > What to do mean a personal decision? > > LOL, that's me getting something wrong ... I'd also just read Nuxx > asking about why GC's kids wear helmets ... and got the two mixed up > for which I apologise.

Hallelujah. A urc denizen actually admitting that they were wrong, and even deigning to apologise. Now we just need Crapman to do the same regarding his accusations about me using other people's words. And while we're at it, he can finally admit the bleeding obvious: that his sole reason for supporting cameras is that he wants motorists off the road, and he wants motorists off the road because he HATES THEM.