Nuxx:A3fe057a-b621-4a67-893d-9956b0c6220a@t16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com

Path: num2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!num1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!number.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!t16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Message-ID:  From: Nuxx Bar  Newsgroups: uk.net.news.moderation Subject: Re: Confused about URCM in UNNM Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 15:56:38 -0800 (PST) References: <20110311231219.46e037e6@surya> <4pcln6prfn7vvv3v2tgmqv60hbv0kuus4g@4ax.com>  <1jy0h9z.2shxli9zpp23N%real-not-anti-spam-address@apple-juice.co.uk>  <20110312111550.7290b007@bluemoon> <0smmn69shfmi0co5545cbqll95e6si9h5p@4ax.com>  <4crmn6d305m6ko5cig7et205m4feveoaoo@4ax.com>     Lines: 32 Organization: http://groups.google.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.71.49.124 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299974199 30254 127.0.0.1 (12 Mar 2011 23:56:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.71.49.124; posting-account=7_6kYAkAAABD6HrjM0VxehwvZOKMxm4g User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.15,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3407 Xref: perfectly-safe.chapmancentral.co.uk uk.net.news.moderation:38852

On Mar 12, 7:20=A0pm, Alistair Gunn  wrote: > Just zis Guy, you know? twisted the electrons to say: > > > On 12/03/2011 15:03, Tom Crispin wrote: > > > My history is quite good. The much denied "delay list", > > > coined by me, was eventually uncovered as a "single-moderator list". > > So not a delay list then. > > No point continuing this. > > I thought the so called "delay list"[1] was the watch list which merely > indicated that the moderator might to take extra care with the post in > question? =A0Though that too wouldn't be a "delay list" either ... > > [1] A passlist automatically passes things, a blocklist automatically > =A0 =A0 blocks things but apparently a "delay list" doesn't automatically > =A0 =A0 delay things ... =A0

I think Jackson's got the point, you're very keen to join the "moderator" list and help him maintain his slim majority, and that's why you've suddenly popped up defending him all over the place. As you have the "right" transport-related opinions and have always been a keen supporter of his "moderation" style, I'm sure you've got as good a chance as any, if only he can convince the less unreasonable "moderators" of your worth. We shall see.

(Remember when you pettily took that picture down from your website which you had linked to just because *I* also linked to it and dared to use it to prove a point that you didn't want proving? That kind of idiotic cutting your nose off to spite your face in order to promote anti-car rhetoric is just the kind of thing that Jackson loves...I'm surprised you weren't asked to be a "moderator" in the first place, but fingers crossed now, eh?)